Public Option Health Care May Get Dropped

by Jordan Yerman | August 17, 2009 at 09:39 am
527 views | 52 Recommendations | 10 comments

As debate continues over health care reform, the Public Option is facing the axe. The "public option" refers to a government-run health insurance program to run alongside the pre-existing HMOs.  The big question is whether or not the public option must break even, or if it can run at a deficit. If the public option can run at a deficit, detractors fret that it will drive the existing HMOs out of business. What is public option health care? A health program which is underwritten by the government, offering reduced premiums for those who can't afford private HMO coverage.

I suspect that this is an unfounded fear, since every country that I can think of which has public health programs, also has thriving private health insurance companies. As for the lurking bugbear of "socialism", relax. Deep breath. The US will never become socialist. Seriously. We'd have to move to the left first, which, as a quick glance at our political position compared to the rest of the world will show, has not quite happened yet.

However, without the public option, I don't believe that this could really be called  true health care reform at all, since we'd simply be reshuffling people in the existing structure, which is visibly broken.

The “public option,” a new government insurance program akin to Medicare, has been a central component of Mr. Obama’s agenda for overhauling the health care system, but it has also emerged as a flashpoint for anger and opposition.

I dunno- one day I'd like to move back to the US, but that's just not going to happen as long as I am forced to choose between rent and healthcare. The common argument is "make sure you get a job with health benefits", but that just begs the initial question: why is it so unaffordable in the first place? I've had to perform ad-hoc suturing on myself with duct tape: ill-advised, perhaps, but necessary at the time as I could not afford an ER visit and I was uninsured, but over the income level for Medicare. Never again, thanks.


The Atlantic has a nice roundup of op-eds from both sides of the debate.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
generaldecay

Jordan, I'm with you. I would like to work in America for a while but there's no tempting me right now when healthcare is so inaccessible. That is the one basic human need I am not prepared to compromise on.

1
rng

I think if it gets dropped, then it demonstrates gutless politics by Obama and the Democrats, and fails as true reform. If ever there was an issue and time too fight, this is it.

The Democrats need to grow some Kuhonas and fight to keep a viable public option and one payer system in consideration. Educate the people, fight with information and real data and push it to a vote.

I am now stepping down off my soap box LOL

1
a211423

I understand your frustration rng, but I am also a realist.  We need health care reform, and I want a public option--what I really want is a single payer universal health care.  But I know this is not going to happen; therefore, what are the options and compromise points.  It looks like the public option is going to be a compromise issue. I am not happy about this, but if insurance exchanges are going to be substituted, let's start debating how the exchanges can be managed.  I wrote a piece on another thread about considerations in initiating them. 

Insurance Exchanges 

We can now open the discussion on insurance exchanges.  Exchanges function somewhat like a large employer as purchaser.  They assemble, organize, disseminate information about competing health plans, enact policies that promote risk pooling, design benefit packages, negotiate premiums, limit the number and types of plans marketed, structure the enrollment and plan-selection process.  This is done because consumers are rarely, if ever, equipped to deal with markets offering complex, expensive, hard to understand products.  "Consumers facing complex, high-stakes choices are prone to predictable errors.  They are likely to lack the skill and time to make choices based on a careful assessment of the relative costs and quality of competing health plans, tending instead to choose on the basis of anecdotal information, such as their friends' experience." (NEJM 7-22-09)

How should exchanges be administered.  Exchanges should recognize the realities of behavorial economics.  "Inertia due to numbers" reinforces "status quo bias."  This was discovered in a Swiss health insurance study that revealed when faced with a choice of 30 to 75 health plans that all met mandated coverage standards, there was less competition because people were less likely to change plans thus suppressing competition.  When choices become very large and people are overwhelmed this prevents them from seeking information on alternative plans that are less expensive.  Insurers know this and consider their customers captive customers; therefore, the incentive to competively lower premium costs is mitigated. 

Studies of Medicare recipients suggests when consumers are faced with complex, uncertain choices with consequences they rely on simple rules, many times to their detriment. 

Exchanges need to be structured to encourage consumer choices through consumer-friendly information.  Information and web-based tools to compare plans and their summaries, and to evaluate plans based on individual need and income, but this might not be enough for some to decide. Some federal oversight, counseling and referral would be a practical component for those who need personal help in making a selection.  Also, people should be encouraged to review their plans yearly to evaluate the market and change plans if a better one is available, thus promoting health plan competition.

0
rng

I understand your frustration rng, but I am also a realist

I understand, but there are some basic human rights that should transcend sordid pragmatism and political horse trading. We are supposedly a developed nation, so why do we act like a 3rd world power when it comes to health care?

We can fund wars, we can bail out AIG (ah and for any confused free marketers THAT was new generation socialism), and the rest but we balk at real health care reform? If for once the Democrats want to really effect change for long term benefit, then this is the issue. We do not need to be in Afghanistan. We never needed to be in Iraq. We do need health care reform, and real reform includes a public option and a single payer system IMHO

4
Roy C

Safeway Health Plan. It is one of the few plans that has contained costs because it uses a well-thought out and effective wellness  plan. Keeping the costs down benefits the employees by letting them pay less for their coverage and keeps pressure on wages down so Safeway can stay competitive.

Effective wellness plans are based on the idea that the only way we can do the maximum good is to create health rather than manage disease. Or, we could say that the best way to manage disease states was to minimize or prevent their occurrence in the first place.

0
Rory Cripps

Roy: I like that! Preventive maintenance and periodic tuneups!

1
a211423

I totally agree in holistic practices, and this is one of the positive aspects of the health care reform debate that has heretofore gone unaddressed.  Including health plans in the exchange that reward wellness and healthy lifestyles gets my vote. 

0
Paschen

:) Great Post.

0
Pythiian1

The public option is an integral part of health care reform proposal. 

It will be very unfortunate, if President Obama and Congress choose to drop the public option from the Health Care reform.


1
peter.reardon

I was very young when "healthcare" or National Health Service - NHS, was  introduced in the UK but I have no recollection of masses of people suddenly turning to socialism: if they did it was probably because of other politically motivated factors.

Wealthy industrialists, for example influenced government, as did the landed aristocracy who have acted as Conservative "lobby groups" since day one of English parliamentary governance.

Both the Conservatives and Liberals held power at different times until the Labour Party was voted into office after the second World War. The man and woman on the street at last had a fair crack at voting for representation in the "House".

In  the mean-time, America is still an emerging country. The people will determine how long they will tolerate being, misinformed and misled by a self-serving "democratic" opposition.

Thanks for the story Jordan.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

generaldecay
First Flagged at 9:45 AM, Aug 17, 2009 by generaldecay

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (52)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from