NP Rank:
Racial Profile Killed Menezes, They would do all again
GUN cops on the squad that shot Jean Charles de Menezes have said they would do it again — as an inquest into his death opens today. The Met’s brave CO19 marksmen said the split-second nature of their work meant they could not change how they operate. Fury erupted over the death of the innocent Brazilian, which came just two weeks after 52 commuters were killed in the 7/7 London bombings in July 2005. Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair could be forced to quit if jurors find de Menezes, 27 — mistaken for a suicide bomber at Stockwell Tube station — was unlawfully killed. But C019 Inspector Brian, who cannot be fully named for security reasons, said: “We could shoot an unarmed man again. “It’s the nature of the work.” PC Dean, 34, told The Sun — who spent a night shift with the unit — “We’re not trigger-happy.” But PC Paul, 29, said: “You’ve a split second before taking that shot. Afterwards people have forever to analyse it.” Although C019 officers were called to 10,000 incidents last year, they fired just THREE shots.Some 65 current and ex-police officers and 17 Tube passengers will testify at the 12-week inquest at The Oval cricket ground.
There have already been two police reports and a health and safety prosecution against the Met over the shooting, which came a day after failed Tube bombing bids.
All about Mezes murder from UK coops:
"There is no point in shooting at someone's chest because that is where the bomb is likely to be. There is no point in shooting anywhere else if they fall down and detonate it."
Jean Charles de Menezes was not warned or challenged by police before he was shot seven times in the head, it was revealed yesterday.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) report said police had given the Brazilian no instruction "that an innocent man would have understood".
IPCC Commissioner Naseem Malik said: "There is no action he could have consciously taken that would have saved him".
The revelations contradicted the Met's insistence that Mr de Menezes failed to obey a challenge by police at Stockwell Tube station.
Though the full details of the conduct of the police officers who shot him on July 22 2005 are part of a separate investigation, a few new clues emerged from the report.
Police followed Mr de Menezes, 27, when he left his flat in Tulse Hill, south London, which was under surveillance due to the previous day's attempted bombings.
The report says: "He was seen to get on to a bus, alight at Brixton Underground and almost immediately get back on to the bus. He then travelled to Stockwell Underground. Whilst the train was stationary surveillance officers pointed him out to armed officers who, at about 10.06hrs, shot and killed him."
Police radio evidence, and officers' accounts "inaccurately" described his clothing as he headed to the station.
There is no elaboration on the discussions that led to two marksmen running on to the Tube after Mr de Menezes.
"The IPCC investigation understands that Mr de Menezes did not refuse to obey a challenge … and was not wearing any clothing that could be classed as suspicious," the report adds.
In the aftermath of his death, it was revealed police were adhering to a policy known as "Operation Kratos", which said there was no need to challenge potential suicide bombers before shooting.
It was dubbed a "shoot-to-kill" policy because, where public or police are in imminent danger, it is suggested marksmen should aim at the head, not the torso, to "neutralise" the subject.
Crowd Power
-
Ahmed Eldemellawy
Nozha, Cairo, Egypt








Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 20:41 on September 21st, 2008
Luiz Castro, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 20:48 on September 21st, 2008
Luiz Castro, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 22:22 on September 21st, 2008
"In the aftermath of his death, it was revealed police were adhering to a policy known as "Operation Kratos", which said there was no need to challenge potential suicide bombers before shooting."
Wait.
Woah.
...Whoah.
What's a "potential suicide bomber"? What the hell kind of precedent is this?
Man, it's a crazy world we live in these days.
at 22:23 on September 21st, 2008
Also, this happened three years ago, but I'm glad you posted about it. I wouldn't have heard about this otherwise.
at 22:54 on September 21st, 2008
I'd like to share the photo in principle, but the Sun headline is completely wrong. I know because I've spoken with members of the family. They didn't racially profile him - he looked nothing like the terrorist in question, and wasn't behaving suspiciously. These are two myths which the Met want us to believe, to absolve them of responsibility for his death. They think if we believe it was just 'an easy mistake to make' for a 'cop under pressure' then it'll be ok, but none of that was true. Jean Charles de Menezes was murdered.
- reply
KnowMe (not verified)at 04:37 on September 22nd, 2008
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
It is a fear hatred based propaganda to install their police state. The internet is actually revealing who is the man behind the mask, and the masses are waking up to get rid of the parasitic system...their dooms day is near, just stop watching that idiot box TV, they use highly sophisticated communication techniques to push their inhuman agenda. Always search your news on Internet and share it with others, this will bring down all the parasites who are disguised behind the slaughtering of civilians in past and recent histories.
at 00:36 on September 22nd, 2008
Luiz Castro, I like this story. It's good stuff.
- reply
Nappy_Nappy (not verified)at 00:37 on September 22nd, 2008
And of course there was a generally perceived high level of risk at the time and a shoot to kill policy.
at 04:55 on September 22nd, 2008
Luiz Castro, I shall think twice before riding a common carrier HERE. I rather be NOT CONSIDERED GREEN enough, than looking a bit TOO RED!
at 12:18 on October 19th, 2008
So, the bad news is you could be shot without warning. The good news is they will aim for your head so you probably won't even notice. Sounds like "Operation Cretin".
Still, as the officer said, they have a split second to decide.