Racism In America Is Not What It's Cracked Up To Be!

by Rory Cripps | September 19, 2009 at 11:29 am
1171 views | 56 Recommendations | 26 comments

   Some Americans (and many throughout the world that have an axe to grind against America) believe that the mere fact that Americans have recently exercised their protected right of free speech (at the 9/12 protest rally in D.C.) under the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution, constitutes, "a lethal atmosphere". And some believe that U.S. Congressman Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst, during President Obama's health care address, constitutes a "lethal atmosphere". And some believe that those who oppose proposed health care legislation and that voiced their opposition at town hall meetings constitutes "a lethal atmosphere".

   Moreover, some believe that all so-called "right wing" talk radio shows constitute "a lethal atmosphere". And some go so far as to believe that specific media personalities (such as Glenn Beck,  Rush Limbaugh, and Michael Savage), in and of themselves (and by their very nature), constitute " a lethal atmosphere", because of their purported Svengali affect over their  listeners. Yes! According to some,  those particular talk show hosts should be shut up and thrown off the airwaves in the name of "fairness" and "free speech".

   I have no doubt that the amount of threats against President Obama far exceed those of previous presidents and that the Secret Service is working overtime and doing a fine job at that. And I have no doubt that "a lethal atmosphere" exists. With that said, what is your solution to the "lethal atmosphere"? Should the U.S. government place wire-taps on those Americans that some deem to be creating "a lethal atmosphere"? And should the U.S. government round up those that some deem to be  responsible for creating "a lethal atmosphere"? Should the U.S. government confiscate all privately owned firearms, because firearms pose a threat to President Obama and other politicians that some deem to be sympathetic to a particular ideology? Where does governmental mitigation of "a lethal atmosphere" begin and where does it end within the context of the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution?

   In my opinion, "a lethal atmosphere" exists when proponents of a particular political ideology attempt to stifle opposing viewpoints and therefore "free speech" as protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In the case of President Obama and his administration, there indeed appears to be a frantic and emotional  attempt to have him sheltered from any and all legitimate criticism. And those that attempt to shelter him seem to come up with new and creative rationalizations, every day, to deflect legitimate criticism from President Obama and his administration. Perhaps none of this would bother me were it not for the fact that when Bush and other Republican Presidents were in office, the very same people that are now attempting to shelter President Obama cried "foul" when the same sheltering  tactics were used against them. Hypocrisy is a word that no longer has any meaning for Americans . . . .

   I simply don't agree that race and racism factor into " a lethal atmosphere" to the extent that some would have us believe. And I'll go a step further and venture to ask the following: What is the specific racial and ethnic origin and breakdown of those individuals and groups that have issued  explicit and substantiated threats  against President Obama? Does anyone know? And if anyone does know, are they willing to reveal the statistics? Are the  majority of threats coming from right wing caucasian groups, or Jews, or Muslims, or Asians, or Hispanics, etc.? This is a fair question, because Americans and the rest of the world have been led to believe that virtually all threats against President Obama are from Republicans and  right-wing hate groups which translates into whites only . . . .

   I remind you: Had it not been for white voters, President Obama wouldn't have been elected. The facts are that the overwhelming majority of those that voted for President Obama are white. And the facts are that the overwhelming majority that voted against him are white. So are we, therefore, to draw the conclusion that half of white America is racist and the other half is not?  

   I simply don't believe that Americans, nowadays, are anywhere near as racist and race conscious as the ideologues and the race hustlers would have us believe. If that were true, "ethnic cleansing", on the part of the white majority,  would have continued in America along similar lines that the white majority subjected Native Americans to . . . .

   I grew up in a typical white middle class American home beginning in 1954 (the year that the Brown v. Board of Education opinion was handed down)  My parents were registered Republicans. No one in my home ever used the "N" word (Mom, a devout Southern Baptist, even cried when a woman in her presence used the "N" word during a "forced busing" demonstration) and I was taught respect for all peoples. I know that's hard to believe for some--and what's probably even harder for some to believe is that I was raised no differently from most white Americans at the time . . . .

   My  hope and desire (but perhaps just a fantasy) is that we "get beyond race" in America and accept the fact that we're all Americans. And accept the fact that, in spite of our obvious racial and ethnic differences, we  have much more in common than the color of our skin would indicate. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that those who cry the loudest about "getting beyond race" could make a better attempt at "getting beyond race" and find it in their hearts and souls to forgive and forget.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
3
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Good post Rory, I think forgiving is possible, forgetting is another story.  We need to know history in order not to repeat it.

1
158

A very, very good and informative article.

2
Karen Hatter

Rory, as I used the phrase "lethal atmosphere" in my response to you at my article, Why There Is Danger in Ignoring Racism in America and the phrase is quoted several times throughout this piece, I am including the entire comment here, for context:

You may have missed the point of my article, Rory.

There is a lethal atmosphere that has been created and allowed to flourish since the 2008 presidential campaign that has gone mostly unchallenged by both parties.

Given America's violent and historically documented response to change, from various elements, from slavery, so called civil rights, immigration, and here, I am speaking of the Ellis Island immigrants and the furor created upon their arrival and attempts to meld into already settled communities, it is the responsibility of both parties involved in this pretense of a political debate to call out any who cross the line, contributing to incitement and violence. 

2
Hugh Askew

This so called "lethal atmosphere" has only been present since the 2008 election?

Really!

Funny, i first noticed it after the Supremes decided that a dangling chad here was the same as a dangling chad there.  Of course, us Democrats like sticking our finger in someone's eye, but are not so keen on getting one stuck into ours.

2
Karen Hatter

Hugh, I was discussing the specific instance of the particular rhetoric that was used during the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign, as has been fully articulated in the article I have written and linked here.

0
158

Please check the anti Bush rhetoric of 2004 and 2008.

2
not me this time

Because people oppose Obama and his obvious agenda does NOT constitute being called a racist. It seems the very people who call Americans "racist" because they do not agree with someone is in all reality the racist.

3
Hugh Askew

Good job, Rory. Needed saying.

Growing up, using the N word was treated the same as any other foul langauge - in other words, it wasn't permitted. That i might add, was in a household of uneducated (my father quit school to farm after 8th grade), moved to the city, farmers.


0
Rory Cripps

Hugh Askew: Thank you! I grew up in a home where curse words were not tolerated too. BTW: I think that the "uneducated", back in the day, were more educated and a heck of a lot smarter than the "educated" are nowadays . . . .

3
Rory Cripps

Thanks ACP! Your point about "forgetting" is well taken. But in this peculiar case, it seems that the only thing that we can do to make things better is to "forget" and start from a blank slate. I've got a lot of Irish American friends whose ancestors suffered some real hard times. And I've got some Chinese-American friends whose ancestors suffered some real hard times. And I've got some Jewish friends whose ancestors suffered some real hard times. And I've got some Polish-American friends whose ancestors suffered some real hard times. And the town that I grew up in was predominantly German-American and during WWII  most of the town's residents had relatives that were killed in the war. And so it goes . . . . We need to put things into perspective and move on in spite of the past wrongs that have been committed against humanity. Relatively speaking, America, nowadays, is a free and open playing field in terms of race and ethnicity.

3
a211423

The ultimate goal is to protect individuals from the advocacy of hatred and violence toward others.  Hate speech is the symptom of intolerance and bigotry; therefore, responses need to manifest systemic change that encourages acceptance without restrictions of freedom of speech and expression.  The real change in mindsets, perceptions and discourse can occur in the strengthening of  intercultural dialogue and education for diversity and tolerance. 

"The answer to hate speech is more speech." (International Covenant on Citil and Political Rights on Freedom of Conscience, thought and religion; April 2009) More speech that educates about cultural differences; more speech that promotes diversity; more speech to empower and give voice to minorities through community media and, yes, like NowPublic.  This is how to reach out to the hearts and minds, changing what they think, not just what they do.

Yes, there is danger in ignoring racism; furthermore, lets continue the dialogue, and celebrate the fact that we are free to do so.   

0
Karen Hatter

Very well said, A.

2
Rory Cripps

a211423:
"The answer to hate speech is more speech."
Yes! I couldn't agree more! And one of the reasons why I say that is because I firmly believe, in my heart of hearts, that the overwhelming majority of  Americans are not "haters" and that the overwhelming majority of Americans are not "racists". With that said, it's becoming increasingly apparent that ideologues are spreading the word (not only in America but throughout the rest of the world) that America is inherently a "racist" society and that white Americans are inherently "racists" and that no person "of color" is a "racist" no matter what their racial views and opinions. In other words, I'm a "racist" and you're a "racist" and the rest of White America is "racist"" simply because we're white and simply because we exist. This is total, complete, and absolute racism, and a belief that even  Klan members and Skinheads would be reluctant to subscribe to . . . .

0
charliemax

The ultimate goal is to silence dissent.

2
Barry ORegan

I agree , excellent post

0
Rory Cripps

Thanks Barry!

4
2deltaactual

Rory.I see that you are an author.I think you are trying to race bait all of us as your story or point has been lame.What are you trying to accomplish?Anyone can say racism and get some kind of reaction both positive or negative.So far you just seem to be an instigator pushing peoples emotions.Which makes you a pisspoor Author unless you work for a tabloid Rag.Which means that you are not a journalist or an artist but a race baiter that you supposedly detest.Please remember in 2008 surveys showed that the majority of Americans trusted the media less than politicians.That's as low as it gets.Man up and make your point.Otherwise stop boring us.Thankyou.2Delta.

2
Amy Judd

As you are new to the site, let me tell you that we welcome comments and discussion, but no personal attacks are allowed at any time. It's in our code of conduct that you agreed to when you signed up to the site.

Please keep the discussion on topic with no personal attacks as it can lead to a suspension of your account.

Thank you

0
Rory Cripps

Thank you Amy! I'm glad that you're out there doing your job! My intention in posting this story was not to incite. The story comes from the heart and is sincere. But quite frankly I have a problem with anti-semites who post non-verified (such as Marine Sgt. Victor Rodriguez) and then come back on the site under a different name and make personal attacks simply because they don't agree with someone's point of view. It would be wonderful if every NP member used their full name and posted a full facial of themselves as I've done. It's hard at times not to respond to personal attacks. And what's even harder, for me, is to not respond in kind too those with a big mouth and who present themselves as tough guys. It's simply not in me in me to back down from a challenge whether that challenge be physical or verbal or both. And my word is true . . . .

0
Rory Cripps

2deltaactual: Yes! Everything that you say is true in your own mind. No doubt about it! Thank you for your comment.

0
Rory Cripps

I see that you got two check marks for your comment. Apparently you have something to say that strikes the fancy of others. Let's see what you've got 2delt. I can't wait to read your stories.

2
djermano

Rory:

The fact is Native American Indians were the first to be racially profiled. They were killed instead of taken for slaves..... later rounded up and thrown on Reservations that still exist in the United States. Black American racism is secondary, along with the racism that affects all races in the world to include the white-guy.......who was left with no other alternative but to fight and work within the economic conditions of the times they found themselves in. ....

We still face that same dilemna as who are Blacks to threaten discrimination overtones, when they themselves were part of the pioneer Army Soldiers who shot, and killed innocent Native American Indian Tribes and families at the bequest of the US Government....drove them off their land, and dumped them on Reservations. Black Americans are not immune or hold some authentic victims declaration to being the original racially profiled group, when in fact they are as guilty as the ones they accuse.

We have always held a certain decoruum to White Presidents because it was white men who wrote the constitution, the declaration of independence, and actually were the beginnings to the United States Government.  We have seen throughout time especially in Africa who hold the majority of the Black race have never come to the Political Economic heights America has achieved with black leadership.... Mugabe is case in point as the modern day failure in Zimbabwe, while Mandella maybe the modern day hero in S. Africa...but he has not achieved the economic progress many had hoped he could achieve.

Perhaps we should ask the question why America has not really achieved much even with Obama, when it has never had a Native American Indian President?

May I ask you all, why have we failed to recognize this poignant fact.

All I know is I am looking for the day for America's First Native American Indian President. Then maybe we will win the racial discriminatory debate once and for all.

America the land of snake dogs, hypocrites, druggies, murderers and military wacko's.

No wonder America is a comatose patient.....shaking and spitting blood all the time.

Rev. Jermano....

0
Rory Cripps

djermano: Thanks for your comment. I'm a big Ira Hayes fan. I would love to see a Native American in the White House. Yes! Native Americans got the it end of the stick--no doubt about it.

1
Ron Higgins

In my 51 plus years on this earth as a African American male, here's what I have come to critically realize, America is a country fill of hypocrites and contradictions! The racism, sexism, classism, eliteism, premeates our society, everyone included, no exceptions. My point is it's not so much that Obama is in the White House, and  that all of us can strive for the highest office in the land, it's the blatant labeling and disparaging insults that that make me sick.Politics aside, people are "supposed to be judged on merits, accomplishments and failures, Obama is already being vilified to the point that now, any agenda he brings up, will be strongly condemed by the conservative right, who "want thier country back." What country is that? I'm convinced it has more to do with a African American in office, that was the darling, until a strategy could be implemented to demonize his every effort. I served in the US Marines for 24 years, and have went in harms way, for racists to continue to spew vemon and lies, because of first amendment rights. I't's the American way, total hypocracy!   

0
djermano

I agree Ron....It does not matter who is President. They all go through the rigger of personal attacks and scrutiny. It has come to the point, who really cares who is President, or the hoops one has to go through to get there. There is no prize at the end of that Poltical Racing Rainbow.

You in the marines I never want you to protect me. In fact I think the military is the problem in the world, not the answer... But I won't call you names....but I also won't live in the US so you guys can tax me, take my money to support your bullet making endeavors.

Hypocrisy can also be looked at in another way as supporting Toleration. But who draws the lines to that? That is one of the problems. The inability to accept toleration, without it becoming hypocrisy.....

True unity is found when we are the same on issues. But America and people are never the same.. How is it we are a United States? We are either Anti War as an American Identity or we are Pro-War. When there are no more conflicts in the world...who gives us the right to pay the military when it is not in use or needed? The Pentagon assures war..to the point of accepting to commit murder to jusify their work and identity. This is diabolically wrong...

Rev. Jermano

0
Roberto Alvarez-Galloso

Great post

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
First Flagged at 11:40 AM, Sep 19, 2009 by Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Related Stories

Recommendations (56)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from