NP Rank:
Radical extremists in Montana
They apparently live in the Wild West for their freedom. They conjure up hatred for government. They develop a power base among like kinds. Eventually, something snaps. Add the ingredient of Marine Corps or Green Beret training and you have David Burgert.
“'Armed and extremely dangerous' ex-militia leader hunted after Mont. shootout
David Burgert, a former Marine, previously told police 'he wasn't going to be taken down'
MISSOULA, Mont. — Federal and state agents searched a 30-square-mile swath of rugged Montana forest on Monday for a former militia leader following a shootout with sheriff's deputies, authorities said.
David Burgert, 47, exchanged gunfire with Missoula County sheriff's deputies along a logging trail Sunday after a slow-speed chase near Lolo, officials said. No one was hurt.
Burgert grabbed gear from his Jeep and fled on foot into the woods, Missoula County Undersheriff Mike Dominick said.
Known for his anti-government sentiments, Burgert previously told police "he wasn't going to be taken down like last time," Dominick said.
The former Marine may have planned the attack, Dominick told The Associated Press Monday. Officials believe he may have placed caches of food and weapons along his planned escape route.
Stolen rifles
Authorities found ammunition packed inside the Jeep's engine compartment and in another vehicle associated with Burgert, as well as two stolen rifles and a magazine of handgun ammunition on the ground near where he fled, Dominick said."He was prepared for a confrontation," Dominick said. "It was not a high-speed chase, he drove purposely onto the logging road and he engaged the deputies with one to three shots."
He described Burgert as a survivalist who is no stranger to the backwoods and who may be in possession of a third vehicle, possibly a tan or red Jeep model.
Authorities seized two of three vehicles registered to Burgert, including the Jeep Cherokee loaded with rifles that he abandoned Sunday, but suspect he may have stashed another SUV in the Lolo National Forest, Dominick said.
"He is armed and extremely dangerous," Dominick told Reuters.
Tactical agents from the FBI and agents from U.S. Marshals Service, Missoula police, Missoula County sheriff's officers, as well as law officers from the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management and the Montana National Guard were looking for Burgert in a rugged, sparsely populated area of the forest, Dominick said.”
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (33)
at 06:33 on June 14th, 2011
Source: splcenter.org
at 06:50 on June 14th, 2011
Guess he must be unhappy with the current political environment in D.C.
at 07:27 on June 14th, 2011
No one was hurt in a shoot out during a slow-speed chase. People of Montana must feel secure with that level of inept local and Federal talent watching their back. It's no wonder people like Burgert want to shoot them. Then again Herr Ober 'Bama isn't going to want good people observing the legal aspects of government while he institutes his one party system and legalizes the circumvention of Congress. With the urbanites totally supportive of Obama's fascistic goals the rural militants might be America's last hope for preserving democracy.
at 12:05 on June 14th, 2011
You must be stuck on the Military Channel. Too much WWII.
at 08:57 on June 15th, 2011
Jim, as in this fellow's case, most survivalists/anti government types are making ready for a war with nearly everyone, with no one other than those of like minds being exempt from their wrath.
at 13:50 on June 15th, 2011
Source: abcnews.go.com
at 11:01 on June 16th, 2011
Fascism is most evident among the Republican Party and those that represent their ideology as they seek ways to impose their will completely upon everyone not in sync with their vision for taking America backwards.
Source: webcache.googleusercontent.com
Also at NowPublic:
Right Wing Extremist Tendencies: In the 1990s Forward to Today
at 10:52 on June 14th, 2011
More intentional misdirection. Quoting from a "progressive" magazine article on "ultra-conservative movements" does not attribute fascism to Republicans in general. However, there is no denying the fascism of Obama's One Party System of complete circumnavigation of Congress in matters of creating government institutions, enacting law/expanding the intent of laws, or creating positions of authority exempt from Congressional oversight.
at 11:20 on June 14th, 2011
When one examines the actions of those Republicans that have come into office since 2010, shell casing (not verified), it is indeed fascism that is their goal.
The first act of fascism and the very first order of business, presided over by the newly elected Republican controlled House of Representatives? Stripping voting rights from congressional delegates.
Source: thehill.com
What is most particularly worthy of note, the machinations emanating from the so called Religious Right.
The acts perpetrated by many within the Right Wing of the Republican Party speak for themselves.
Also at NowPublic:
My Interview with Religious Right Founder's Son, Frank Schaffer
at 12:44 on June 14th, 2011
When two examine the actions of Obama and his "progressive" staffed office it is indeed fascism that is being instituted. We no longer need fear the ultra-conservative Republicans for something they never accomplished. We have Obama, and Obama has stolen a march on the ultra-conservative's plans for a fascist State by making it his reality. Fascism by Democrat. Welcome to "progressive" America.
at 13:21 on June 14th, 2011
Source: thinkprogress.org
As long as corporate conservative Republicans are throwing their substantial money into the TEA Party apparatus, that is, herding most of those TEA Party adherents in the direction they wish to herd them while continuing to push Right Wing activities throughout the United States, with some measure of success occurring on local levels, as in trying to complicate student voters' ability to vote while they're away from home because they tend to vote for the Democratic Party, the old 'Don't look at what they're doing behind the curtain' routine won't work, shell casing (not verified).
at 14:01 on June 14th, 2011
"the old 'Don't look at what they're doing behind the curtain' routine won't work". Really! Because you are working it to no end where Obama is concerned. You intentionally mislead by interpreting everything as a Republican conspiracy.
Since when is challenging so called "reforms" a particular conservative or Tea Party characteristic. Oh right, we're not counting reforms put forth by Republicans that are challenged by Democrats.
Since when is challenging the hyped falsity of global warming and it's corresponding fear mongering become particularly conservative. Oh right. If you don't buy in lock, stock, and barrel you're a GW denier.
Since when has not wanting more taxes become a particularly conservative attribute. Well, more taxes on the rich. After all they have to pay for all these so called "progressive" reforms. Not the people who demand them as a moral right.
Since when has it only been conservatives trying to limit stimulus spending. Of course we all remember how much some Democrats were happy to have GW Bush bankrupt the treasury with bail outs as it went with their spend spend economics. Funny how that became all Bush's fault and Democrats had nothing to do with it.
at 15:33 on June 14th, 2011
An example of the Republican Party's idea of reform: cutting funding for a nutrition program that aids low income women and their children and infants, with the program being called a " .... lower priority program ...." by the Republican controlled House of Representative's Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers of Kentucky. Yet, the bill is maintaining funding for the National Arboretum's azalea collection.
Source: thinkprogress.org
Also included among GOP cuts:
Source: foxnews.com
The majority of the Republican Party's reforms have been aimed at targeting those most in need, the poor, middle class citizens and programs that aid them, which, by the GOP's actions, has deemed are acceptable collateral damage on their demented quest to assure that only 'deserving' people, which must be those with the most money, should continue to live or survive.
at 15:57 on June 14th, 2011
You can cut and paste like no one else Karen. It's a shame independent thought and actually attempting to understand what's behind an opposing view isn't part of your intellectual process. If it were you would see that such programs are more than duplicated. They are quadruplicated and it is wasteful and the system needs refinement.
The Dodd/Frank Law is a farce and gives one more agency, in this case the Treasury Dept., an open agenda to set policy and make laws with out any Congressional oversight. The Bill needs to be looked at and adjusted to bring Congress in as the responsible partner and not some Czar named by Obama.
And please. They are not GOP cuts. The GOP are not cutting anything. The GOP cannot cut anything. More of the leftist propaganda as news/fact. Each budgetary item is debatable as to what priority it should have in this time of high economic recession and national debt. It's up to Obama to make the decisions. And he's chosen to spend spend spend. So once more there is no real or immediate threat from the Republican boogeyman. There will be no economic reform and we will sink deeper and ever deeper into debt. Your "progressive" policy makers at work. Enslaving the current unemployed worker to a life of poverty and the following generation as they are born.
at 16:17 on June 14th, 2011
You are correct, shell casing (not verified). I should have written, referring to cuts, as ATTEMPTING to cut.
But, as is the usual case in any discussion/discourse with you, you missed the point, that being that nearly all of the proposed cuts that the Republican Party members have been seeking are aimed at programs that will affect those in need disproportionately.
There is no duplication that provides the services of the nutrition program WIC. In this instance and in the case of many other programs, the GOP is attempting to advance a scorched earth policy in an effort to eliminate social safety nets in place for those in need.
It's too bad you suffer from whatever is your intellectual handicap when confronted by facts you wish not to acknowledge or see.
at 18:40 on June 14th, 2011
Oh your propaganda attempts are never lost on me child. Verifiable facts I can handle. Duplicitous propaganda to further a socialist big government agenda, portrayed as fact, has always been a stumbling block for me. There is WIC, SNAP, CSFP, CACFP, The National School Lunch Program, The School Breakfast Program, The Special Milk Program. That I know of. That's more than four Federally sponsored WIC type programs. Now I don't know what State you live in but, I bet it also offers State sponsored WIC type programs like my State does. So once more your propaganda is refuted with plain and simple real world fact.
at 19:53 on June 14th, 2011
I am not a child, shell casing (not verified).
School programs do not cover children under school age or infants. SNAP, the new name for the Food Stamp Program is not a nutrition program providing counseling for at risk children, infants or their mothers. CSFP is not available in all states. CACFP is for child care providers. The Special Milk Program provides milk for schools and childcare institutions. There's that pesky school thing that leaves out non school age children and not all children are in childcare.
WIC is available in all 50 states.
Source: fns.usda.gov
So, no, you didn't negate my point.
The Republican Party only looks for waste within programs they have opposed for decades and at this point in time, they have seized upon what they view as an opportunity to let their constituents know how cut throat they will be if they get the chance to be let loose to make sure all those undeserving layabouts aren't suckling at the government teat.
at 20:06 on June 14th, 2011
With all those services you socialist are either greedy or utterly incompetent to contribute to the needs of the children you chose to bring into the world. I suspect too much of both. Which is why the constant demand for government to take care of you. And the constant demand for others to pay your way in life.
at 05:21 on June 15th, 2011
If you cared about unwanted children or those for which parents can't properly care, support Planned Parenthood.
at 08:19 on June 15th, 2011
I have advised you before, shell casing (not verified), regarding your continued habit of personal attack when you engage me.
You are ignorant of any information regarding myself to make the presumptive leaps and assumptions you have taken in your effort to yet again disparage my character after you have exhausted all other attempts to defend your position in any discourse.
Familiarize yourself with NowPublic's Code of Conduct. An exchange of ideas is welcome at this site. Ad hominem attacks on contributors with whom you disagree are not.
at 12:44 on June 15th, 2011
Since you always post to me using the appellation "shell casing" you have only yourself to blame. I suggest you grow up and change your own behavior first. Doing that will negate any presumptive leaps in judgement of your character by others. The usual two face behavior from you though. Running to the NP code of conduct when you are shown in your true light by your own actions. Hypocrite.
at 14:26 on June 15th, 2011
You informed me your appellation meant shell casing when I asked why you referred to yourself as a bullet. So be it.
thirty aught six (not verified), your continued habit of a spiraling descent into pluming for ever more ways to call those with whom you disagree out of their name has resulted in my responding in kind on occasion upon provocation.
It is your behavior that has evidenced itself as immaturity by responding with personal attacks when you lose your way in attempting to communicate.
Emblematic of your true character, as I have stated previously on a number of occasions, when you experience inability to defend your articulated position on any given topic, you engage in personal attacks, while hiding behind a cloak of anonymity.
at 15:22 on June 15th, 2011
Blah blah blah. Yawn. What a tedious little ego you are. You're dishonest not only with yourself but with others, and look to cast blame anywhere but upon yourself.
at 02:29 on June 15th, 2011
Back it up. Support with evidence.
at 16:01 on June 14th, 2011
It was your contention, shell casing (not verified), that ....
" We no longer need fear the ultra-conservative Republicans for something they never accomplished"
.... to which my comment was meant to convey, in no shape form or fashion, can your statement be construed to be near the truth.
at 11:56 on June 14th, 2011
Some more info, Jim:
Source: tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com
at 13:15 on June 14th, 2011
Dick Cheney is still at large in Montana.
at 13:24 on June 14th, 2011
(Cue ominous music.)
at 21:56 on June 14th, 2011
when i read the url for this article, i was mislead into thinking it was about the NAACP.
at 02:33 on June 15th, 2011
Thanks for the verification that racism is alive in America.