The 'Reality' Card

by Karen Hatter | June 4, 2008 at 09:21 am | 896 views | 22 comments

So, I grab the latest issue of Newsweek out of the mailbox the other day. The cover title? Obama, Race and Us.

As this primary season has evolved, I've tried to recall, within my lifetime, except during the days of the Civil Rights Movement, with one of the main outcomes of that movement, by the way, being the lifting of legal barriers, allowing for those of African descent to exercise the citizen's right to vote, when the topic of race got moved to the front burner, stewing on low simmer.

Polls are what they are, representative of statistics, which we all know, can and will be interpreted by whomever is reading the information offered. Well, the June 2, 2008 issue of Newsweek has plenty of statistical data, which it delivers as an open letter to Senator Obama offering advice, the author writes, in the form of a ".... honest memo to the candidate."

The most glaring thing about all of the data relating to race, that has been collected and presented by so many entities during this period, is what one might call the pivotal questions that show large majorities for and against a particular, articulated set of circumstances presented to the person polled  by the pollster, splitting almost identically and inversely along racial lines.

In the case of Newsweek's stats, when asked "Do you think Obama has enough experience to be a good president?", while 60% of Black respondents answered yes, 55% of White respondents answered no.

All during this campaign, we have been reminded ad nauseam that among voters that voted for Senator Obama, African Americans, depending upon the point in time you begin measuring the data, have given him their support beginning at around 80% to over 90%.

Among other socioeconomic indicators, Senator Obama has garnered support among the young, across all racial lines, with a significant number of supporters listed among higher educated, professional, young, White Americans, the definition of these criterion, except for race, left to those that termed them as factors.

It has been touted that Senator Hillary Clinton's base of support emanates from among older, women and 'blue collar' voters, again, except for women, to be defined by those who began using the terms.

If the statistics in any way are representative of hard numbers and for the purposes of this piece, let's assume they are, it would be safe to say that among voters within the African American community, given the numbers, majority support for Senator Obama logically cuts across many of the indicators mentioned here, except, of course, for race.

There are differences among the spoken policies of Senators Clinton and Obama yet, as Democrats, in contrast to Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, each of the Democratic candidates' policies would be arguably a great distance away from Senator McCain's plans for the future of America under four years of another Republican presidency.

Still, I found it a stark reality that, according to polls presented by CNN, despite the more similar than dissimilar aspects of candidates Obama and Clinton, among some, irrespective a desire to support the Democratic Party, when polled, these numbers were offered.

Among African American supporters for Senator Barack Obama, among those polled, when asked if their candidate were not the Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States, would they support Senator Hillary Clinton, 71% said they would cast their vote for her.

When asked if Senator Clinton were not to be the Democratic Party nominee, 66% of Clinton supporters polled, identified by CNN as White, stated they would not vote for Senator Obama, with about half of those 66% saying they would vote for Senator John McCain.

Polls are what they are, by no means etched in stone. On Election Day, when each American participates in the electoral process, with the exception of those who may require assistance, they will enter the voting booth alone.

In the privacy, many might say the sanctity, of the voting booth, each citizen may choose whomever they desire for president, away from possibly disapproving eyes.

Shortly after midnight on June 4, 2008, the morning after the two final primary contests in the United States to determine the presumptive Democratic candidate for the office of the President of the United States, with the number of delegates needed to earn bragging rights being 2,118, Senator Barack Obama, his first name means blessed, becoming the first African American to be the presumptive nominee for the office of President of the United States in the Democratic Party, had attained a delegate count of 2,156.

He will become the official Party nominee at the Democratic National Convention, hosted in Denver, Colorado, with the nominee due to hit the stage on August 28, the 45th anniversary of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s delivery of his I Have A Dream speech.

An item on the ongoing nonconcession concession/suspension of Senator Hillary Clinton's campaign.    

Add a comment Comments (22)

Rhonda J Mangus
good stuff:

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Karen Hatter

Thank you, Rhonda.

djermano

Amazing to see that America is still very much a divided nation. But is that really bad? Many people think it is bad. We have elephants waging war against donkeys, and private vs. public, we have black vs white, we have church against state, we have war against peace, and life against death.


How the world copes with all this mess, and really gets a handle on truth is beyond the scope of  Rev. Jermano. You know with voter rigging ever so evident in past elections, I would like to know how Obama really knows he has achieved the goal of delegates? I would like to know how he can prove he is the nominee? The same with Hillary. How does anyone prove they achieved official counts. There is no paper ballots proving that we cast our votes for Obama or Hillary!


Just because someone has tabulated numbers and throws them up from some news source, does not make them true. All I know is that America has not made history whatsoever. It still follows the same old bunch of American Bullcrap since I can ever remember. We still are going to have a man in the White House, whether he is black or white, which in my opinion makes no real difference.


The reality card is that we have not achieved a single thing in this contest. The candidates have said nothing substantial whatsoever about issues, especially in concern to ending a war, but not doing anything about the guys who started it. There is a litany of issues that neither candidate have addressed. Its all been Obama smoke and mirrors, against don't vote for Hillary because she is the wife to Bill Clinton who got off  his Impeachment indictment because he promised Republicans he would pass a bill for Enron's Executives to reach higher profit margins. Which ultimately was one of the reasons 911 happened.


Whatever God forsaken Change Obama has up his sleave, it is only a seditive to make us forget how we Americans have been bamboozled, lied too, murdered, and expect us to believe he is the Dream Rev. King promised in the 1960's. It's all a fraud, and Obama and the entire lot of Americans who continue to believe in false Democracy will never get my support or worthless vote. Really Karen face reality.

Karen Hatter

The reality spoken of here is that after a 17 month process, the Democratic Party presumptive nominee for President of the United States, to be officially given the title Democratic Party nominee in August, is Senator Barack Obama.


 

djermano

Yeah right Karen!  They have gone through this same routine as fas as I can remember, and what has changed?  Obama will change nothing. What's also amazing is that people will claim this is not about race as the race ensues, but it becomes everything about race once he gets the nomination, or the Presidency.  Typical American hypocrisy.

Karen Hatter

You've already stated no one will get your "worthless vote" so, what is your stake in any of this? You've advocated at another thread for the "old lady", your words not mine, to be given the seat by Senator Obama, with him being her vice president, followed by a very long discourse meant to prove only you know what.


According to the attempt at logic in that thread, in the scenario you presented you offered this as some sort of vision of, again, only you know what. Now, you state it's the same routine. This time around, by all accounts, there are a few things different from the usual routine and now most notably one thing in particular.    


What in the world is your point?  

djermano

A woman President that knows how to fix the problems. You are a woman and you don't agree. Trying to find intelligence and a sense of belief and hope in something is what I am after. Worthless vote Karen, is the fact our votes are not secure in knowing if they are being counted, or the elections are being rigged. We always blame the general election in being rigged, but never the Primaries?


The old lady will be you someday Karen. Old lady is in reference to her age if she became Obama's VP, because after 8 years serving as VP she will be too old to run as President.  That is what I am referring to. How can Democrats secure a long time postion in the White House, is by allowing Hillary to be the nominee and Barack the VP. This means 8 years in power. When Hillarys terms end Barack would be the candidate and be President for another  8 years. That's 16 years in power for the Democratic party.


But it is becoming clear none of this will come to bear, because Obama won't be Hillary's VP and  will decide to pick another VP instead of Hillary. He wants to divide the party, and this proves his Republican leaning.


I will not support Obama nor McCain. This makes my vote also worthless.


This means you support a Republican leaning Obama nominee, while the Hillary supporters will go support McCain, and Obama will lose in November.


 

Barry Artiste

Your statement Comrade is as follows.

I will not support Obama nor McCain. I assume you are not American, so it is a Moot point who you can't vote for as a non American.

Your Opinion then is as valid as your fantasy vote.

djermano

Wrong again Barry. I was born in Greenfield Indiana, grew up in Up State New York outside Rochester, and later up North near the 1,000 Islands Alexandria Bay looking over into Canada. In my opinion all American Votes are fantasy's if you can not validate your vote. Here we have Homeland Security, that checks people from breast milk bottles, to scanning your arshole in public, to holding people in detention for never commiting a terrorist act, to rounding up illegal immigrants for deporting who don't work for Bush or Pelosi, and yet we have nothing that secures our voting or validates the process.

Barry Artiste

I like your thinking Lad 

Karen Hatter

As of the end of the primary run, the evening of June 3 after the polls closed, Senator Clinton must completely shoulder whatever divisiveness that continues to plague the Democratic Party.


It is being offered, by her campaign advisers and supporters, that in the world of the Clinton campaign, the night that Senator Obama reached beyond the required number of delegates to be declared the presumptive Democratic Party nominee as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States, that that night was her night. That she deserved the right to bask in the glow, somewhat puzzling statements given she had lost the contest.


Now, the unending concession, the initial plan for this to occur on Friday then Saturday, a plan to suspend, not concede, her campaign, an acknowledgement of Senator Obama as the Democratic nominee however, a plan to maintain her delegates to take into the convention, actions that cannot be seen as anything but actions that will continue to cause dissention within the Democratic Party, since there is no way she can wrest the nomination from Senator Obama.


These actions surely are not indicating a desire to promote Party unity. 

jordan
good stuff:

This is indeed the season of a million polls... all of which will be defenestrated once election day dawns and actual voting behavior commences. The young-person vote, so keenly fought for, has a history of not materializing.


This ties into the swirling rumors of Obama's VP- some think he'll ask Clinton, but I don't think so... the cynical side of me thinks it's too much to ask for the American voting public to accept an African American and a woman on one ticket.

Karen Hatter

Very keen, astute observations, Jordan.

Barry Artiste
good stuff:

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.  Great Story Karen, Americans certainly are stuck on this Race issue. 

If a Canadian ran for Prime Minister who wasn't White, I don't think Canadians would see it as a big deal, Now non French speaking person running for Office is another matter.

Our Governor General, A woman, who is the Queens Representative was born in Haiti, though lives as a Quebecer.  When she was appointed, no one made a fuss about colour or race. Most who were opposed to her being appointed,  stated that she was from Montreal, Quebec, and they wanted someone appointed from Western Canada. Haiti was rarely mentioned, unless she brought it up , when she was visiting Haiti.


Guess Canadians have better things to do, than dwell on race. Like Hockey, Beer, Wool Arctic Codpieces, Toque Fashion, Latest edition of the Crappy Tire Catalogue and the Lottery Numbers.

We are a pretty simple lot. 

Karen Hatter

Barry, as a consequence of the history of the United States, race is almost always an issue or factor, even when it is not mentioned.

Barry Artiste

I guess you're right Karen, trivial when you come to think of it.

I always say the best person for the job.

Not what can I get out of it.


politisite
good stuff:

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Karen Hatter

Thank you, Al.

azzayindia
good stuff:

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Karen Hatter

Thank you, Azzayindia.

nen825
good stuff:

Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Karen Hatter

Thank you, Nen825,

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

June 4, 2008 at 09:21 am by Karen Hatter, 896 views, 22 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from