Reform Education: Rethink No-Child-Left-Behind

by Margaret Dodd | February 26, 2009 at 02:10 pm
294 views | 26 Recommendations | 8 comments

Photos

Sharing the Prize

Sharing the Prize

see larger image

uploaded by Margaret Dodd

My sister, Barbara Shapiro wrote the following, and pasted it in her Facebook profile. I believe it is of great importance that we educate each child to his or her potential. Praise for the sake of praise does not work. Children are not learning to take pride in their work or their effort.

Following is Barbara's article:

When I hear the phrase "no child left behind", I envision a group of racing children at field day games all held to one pace by a tug-of-war rope stretched across in front of their straining chests. This is actually a heart-warming image, as long as there isn't something they all desperately need waiting at the finish line. Why not let the fastest among them run ahead and bring the prize back for all to share?


As long as we insist on education policies and teaching methods geared to the lowest common denominator, we will never provide our brightest students with the opportunities to fulfill their potential. No challenges to the brightest of the math students, physics students, chemistry students? Goodbye topnotch researchers. No challenges to our brightest Biology students? Goodbye topnotch doctors. No stretching the imaginations of our most talented history and English students? Goodbye topnotch politicians and statesmen. The pattern is clear. We are demanding less of our students, they are providing less for our futures. Requiring from our best and brightest a level of academic prowess that will bring their talents to fruition is elemental to our success as a nation. Their individual successes mean our national success.

I am in a unique position to meet with many students one-on-one, as a private tutor. I delight in clarifying ideas that they struggle with, and watching them experience the Eureka that brings real self-esteem. Not the kind of self esteem imposed on them by false praise, but the kind earned by the determined effort of the struggle itself. And I cannot fathom why their teachers demand so little of them. Math assignments are so short that the students cannot be expected to hold onto the concepts even overnight. English assignments are centered around current "literature" that employs jargon, misspellings, and street slang as examples of our native language. This language may be appropriate for conversation among students, but will hardly provide a background from which they might adequately learn to communicate on a formal level. I am convinced that those who learn to impress verbally are those who were given the opportunity to read their language in its pure form. Give our students back the classics.

When we begin to demand of our students the best they can give, each on his or her own level, we will see them rise to the challenge. We will regain our global competitiveness. We will climb toward economic success. And they and their children will inherit a new-found sense of national pride.

Getting back to basics, but with an emphasis on personal best, is key. We can continue to teach all students as if they all learned in the same way, at the same level. Or we can require that those who are capable of more, do more. The students will thrive on the challenge. The nation will thrive on the results.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
jazzyzazzy

I was once priciple of a montissori nursery school.the basic formula of success in this method of teaching ,was all about.DO NOT PUSH DO NOT PULL WALK BESIDE AND GUIDE ME WHEN I NEED TO BE GUIDED.The class was calm and happy play.They learn the boundaries for health and safety without realising it.It is a specialist method of teaching even the furniture was all natural balsa wood with rounded corners.all toys were made of natural substances.The teachers never shouting or talking to them in aggresive manners it was a safe haven.Tho,I sadly have to add it was also expensive fees to create such a wonderful enviroment for the children.Therefore only afforded by wealthy parents.

0
Barbara J. Shapiro

Thanks, Margaret for posting this.

0
Margaret Dodd

You're welcome! I agree with you, wholeheartedly, that children are not being given the right kind of education -  Teach your children well...

2
Roy C

We emphasize helping the apparent losers but the average kid that drops out is above average in ability.

Each child should have his needs met. Disparate sums shouldn't be spent on one versus another without very good reason.

There is resentment against the brightest.

The old Soviet Union would test kids and figure out what kids might have real gifts and then give them training to be a pianist, scientist or whatever.

In the US, parents have this idea that this is not fair, and they think that all kids should be exposed to the best training. That is resentment. Inborn talent is real. We are born with equal rights, not equal talents.

Some kids have gifts that need to be recognized and if you don't recognize him or her and that gift, you end up with that bored kid who may even self-destruct.

0
Barbara J. Shapiro

Thanks for your feedback... right on the money.   P.S.  You read my mind.  That last sentence refers to my son as if you'd met him.

If you don't mind, I'd like to know a little bit about your background, so that I might know where your particular insight comes from.


0
Margaret Dodd

The old Soviet Union took children from their homes at a very tender age to train them to be what someone decided they should be. It is a great idea to foster an inborn talent. Children should be exposed to the best training possible. When children are not given direction they may lose interest, and, as you say, perhaps self-destruct. I have seen it happen. But the Soviets did not have it right removing children from the love and influence of their parents in order to train them. It was a difficult, and usually loveless life for those children. The answer lies somewhere between the two extremes, where children may learn at a rate that is right for the individual, and be encouraged to do more, not allowed to do less. And they should not be rewarded unless they have earned a reward. Spoiled children do not become happy adults, nor do they become productive adults.

1
Paschen

I used to teach at a Waldorf School and send my own kids there because like the younger follow up in for of the Montessori schools it does give the Children the best available education today.

 

0
Roy C

I'd like to hear about that. I recently read that bio of Steiner written by the lead of Blondie. A very good book. I like Steiner.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

jazzyzazzy
First Flagged at 2:28 PM, Feb 26, 2009 by jazzyzazzy
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (26)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from