Republican Scott Brown: Democrat Health Care at Cost of Economy

by Rory Cripps | March 13, 2010 at 11:12 am
552 views | 23 Recommendations | 14 comments

Photos

Sen. Scott Brown

Sen. Scott Brown

see larger image

uploaded by Rory Cripps

Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts called attention to President Obama's and the Democrats' focus on health care at the expense of reviving the U.S. economy, citing Obama's State of The Union promise to focus on jobs and the economy.

"It's almost spring and what is he [Obama] out there talking about again?" said Brown. "That same 2700-page multi-trillion dollar health care legislation."

"An entire year has gone to waste," said Brown.  "Millions of Americans have lost their jobs, and many more jobs are in danger. Even now, the president still hasn't gotten the message." 

According to Brown, the proposed health care legislation will raise taxes by a half trillion dollars, cost "a trillion dollars or more to implement,"  take a half trillion away from seniors on Medicare, and leave America trillions of dollars deeper in debt.

Calling the Democrats' proposed health care legislation a bill that is "tainted by secrecy", concealed costs, and full of "backroom deals",> Brown said that Americans "just aren't buying it" and urged lawmakers to listen to the people themselves and drop the whole scheme of federally controlled health care and start over. 

Videos

GOP Assails Dems Again on Health Care

see larger video

sourced by Rory Cripps

GOP Assails Dems Again on Health Care

"Somehow, the greater the public opposition to the health care bill, the more determined they seem to force it on us anyway", Brown said.

Brown's message to Democratic law makers was, "I'd suggest going with the will of the people."

Brown himself can claim responsibility for the Democrats' failure to pass health overhaul legislation to date. They were on the verge of doing so before Brown claimed the late Edward M. Kennedy's Senate seat in a special election upset in January, depriving Democrats of their filibuster-proof supermajority and throwing the health care effort into limbo.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Hugh Askew

Even now, the president still hasn't gotten the message.

No, duh.

Sorry, should read, "No, duhhhhhh!"

0
Rory Cripps

Hugh: I've said it before and I say it again:  Anytime a political party--whether it be the Democratic or Republican party--is obsessed and fixated on passing trillion dollar legislation it sends up a red flag.

I agree with Scott Brown and I've been saying for months and months that the U.S. economy resembles a depression more than a recession and that the Obama administration along with the Congress and Senate should have made the economy their first priority.

As James Carville said years ago, "It's the economy, stupid!" I hope that I'm wrong (and I've never been known to be an optimist) but from all the economic data that I see, it is going to take years before the American economy get's back on track and the unemployment rate gets back into the 5 percent range which it was in throughout much of the Bush administration.

I've always paid close attention to politics and in all that time, I have never seen a political party and administration more obsessed with a single issue to the exclusion of all other issues than I have seen with the current Administration and congress. Mr. O is making Jimmy Carter look like a political genius for God's sake!

With the U.S. economy in shambles as it is and no light at the end of the tunnel as it were, I scratch my head in disbelief over Obama's and the Democrats' priorities. America is not Chicago and people living in fly-over country couldn't give a you know what about  Saul Alinsky's teachings . . . .

3
nanute

Even now the President, still hasn't gotten the message... Yes he has. And he is standing by his pledge during the campaign that health care would be a priority. The notion that he hasn't been doing enough on the economy and the job front is a distraction being put forth by the opposition to the reform measure on health care.

Remember how when George Bush took us to war in Iraq all the pundits, and Republicans  claimed that despite opposition and critics, he (Bush) was standing by his convictions? Now, Obama is seen as doing what exactly? Standing by his convictions. I know some people don't think he has any, but that is a sperate issue unrelated to health care. If the bill will be the undoing of the Democrats in the mid term elections, Republicans should help the President pass the bill.


0
Rory Cripps

nanute: Any time I see a political party obsessed, as the Democrats obviously are, with passing legislation, it makes me very suspicious of the motives. I don't think that the Democrats--or the Republicans for that matter--have the best interest of the majority of Americans in mind vis a vis their version of health care reform legislation.

The Democrats' health care bill would have been passed long ago if the majority of American voters were for it and any number of Republicans from moderate districts would have crossed over the aisle and supported it.

Were talking about a trillion dollar pipe dream here that many Democrats have been obsessed with for years including the late Ted Kennedy. And let's face facts. If the Democratic party can't pass its version--and only its version--of health care reform before the 2010 elections, health care reform is toast.

And I say "toast",  because given the present political and economic climate, and the fact that Independents (according to all recent polls) are becoming more and more disaffected with the Democratic party, the Democrats are going to lose many seats in the Congress and the Senate come the 2010 elections. The only way that will not occur is if Obama and the Dems pull a rabbit out of their collective political hat or if there is a major upheaval in the U.S. as a result of a devastating terrorist attack, or if the economy and consequent unemployment situation somehow improves dramatically between now and November 2010.

2
The_Cynic

"I'd suggest going with the will of the people." Wasn't the will of the people, electing Obama, that there be universal healthcare? I mean, he was elected by a majority of the people in the US, so that must therefore mean it is the GOP who are going against the will of the people, not the Dems. GOP hypocrisy once again.

0
Rory Cripps

Cynic: The will of the people is dynamic and not static. And at this point the will of the majority of Americans is in opposition to the Democrats' health care reform legislation.

I venture to say that the majority of Americans, including myself, are strongly in favor of health care reform legislation. There is no doubt in my mind that the system is broken and needs to be fixed. Medical costs are astronomical and they keep rising.

I know this all to well from a personal perspective in light of the fact that I have an autistic daughter. It costs me $600 per month out of my own pocket just for my daughter's medication alone!  And her visits to the doctor cost at least $300 per month. Factor that in with the rest of the family's medical bills and we're talking well over $1000 per month just for health care. Add that to a $1000 monthly mortgage payment, $500 in utility bills, food, vehicle insurance, homeowner's insurance, and so on and so forth and it all adds up to over $3000 per month just to live a no-frills existence.

My situation is no different from the millions of middle class Americans out there. We would like nothing better than for our health care costs to go down.  Indeed, we're being squeezed, financially, every which way from Sunday and yet we do not believe that Obama's health care reform legislation will lower our health care costs! In fact, we think that his health care reform legislation will make things much worse. You can imply that we're all idiots and  that we don't know what's good for us. That's fine and that's your opinion. But we simply don't believe that a bunch of politicians, no matter what side of the political aisle they're on have our best interests at heart when it comes to health care reform . . . .

3
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Actually at this point it is not the Republicans against health care that is stopping the legislation from moving forward, but the Blue dog democrats that live in conservative districts.  The ball on this legislation was dropped almost a year ago when Obama had political capital.  He didn't provide the leadership that was needed to put this through. 

Just like Canada you can have a public option without disenfranchising the insurance companies completely.  Obama and the Congress could have taken our Federal National Health Care  Act and Americanized it.  In the end the States will have to administer health care  anyways.  So why not set it up that way from the outset.

The United States already spends more per capita on Health Care than most Western nations.  So a public option exists in Medicaid and Medicare.  You can't blame everything on the GOP.

1
Rory Cripps

Karl: That's right! You can't blame everything on the GOP. I just wish that more Americans  would get it! And what more Americans need to get is that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans hold the key that unlocks the shackles of their discontent.

The only time that things will get better, here in America, will be when Americans cast off their political blinders and see their way clear of  irrational political preferences.

1
hidflect

As a lifelong liberal Obama has failed me too (er.. I'm not American but we'll skip that bit). Scott Brown might turn out to be a GOP'er I could like. Early days... but he's right to hammer the Prez. Whenever when the ship hits the sand, Captain Obama seems incapable of leadership. He needs to channel the ornery-ness of LBJ and mighty quick. Be less the community organizer and more the (foot)ball kicker.

(Did I mix enough imagery and metaphors for ya.. or do you want more?)


1
Rory Cripps

hidflect: In my humble and untutored opinion, Obama is a wimp and a wuss--big time! But you know, many Americans--especially the female Americans--like that about Obama.

1
t k kidwai

Heath care reform was one of Obama's promise he made to the people of United States of America.Rory,you have a point that public opinion is dynamic not static.But the question is that if public is kept misguided all the time by all the politicians,how a promise can be delivered?After-thoughts of the rulers or the ruled means keep matters floating.

If Obama would have done nothing to ensure that health care reform passage gone through,the same old grand jokers' party would have accused him of not fulfilling his promise.

1
hidflect

Well, I think Jesse Ventura was asked a similar question on Larry King about Obama's "focus". And (I paraphrase) he said a President should be able to do at least 3 things at the same time; HCR, jobs and the overseas wars. As an ex-soldier and ex-politician (good at both!) Jesse should know.

0
Rory Cripps

Yeah! Doesn't it make you want to puke knowing that "the most powerful man in the world" is nothing but a wimp and a wuss . . . . I guess that it's the personality, the brains, the persona, and the perception that makes people believe that a wimp and a wuss is "the most powerful man in the world".

0
Bight Meh

Well it could be worse. He could be an alcohlic, drug addict, former cheerleader and draft dodger, chicken-hawk who killed over 4,000 young american soldiers by choosing to start a war based on complete lies for his and his cohorts own enrichment.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Hugh Askew
First Flagged at 11:18 AM, Mar 13, 2010 by Hugh Askew
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (23)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from