Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Riddle of the ten Afghanistan front-line pregnancies
Share: 
by Babel-Fish | November 22, 2009 at 04:38 pm
192 views | 0 Recommendations | 3 comments
Photos
What did the government expect when they allowed women to serve with men near to the battle fields. The military of course can not stop lust as its to damn powerful.
These women should not be repremanded as its their duty to have babies and possibly a shortage of birth control supplies in Afghanistan. Yes thats it the women did not have the correct protective equiptment and thats all the fault of the Labour government.
Its not only a flack jacket problem or a shortage of bullets, birth pills, yes a damn shame no birth protection. Possibly a lack of bromide to put in the tea as well.
Ten British servicewomen have been sent home from Afghanistan after discovering they were pregnant.
They were flown from the front line in the last six months under strict military rules which ban any woman who is expecting a child from battle duty.
Although it is unclear how many of the pregnancies resulted from relationships with colleagues, the mothers-to-be are likely to be investigated for breaching the military's tough sexual conduct rules, the Ministry of Defence warned.
Advertisement
NowPublic on Facebook
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 16:56 on November 22nd, 2009
More birth control products needed near the battle field, Brown has once again let down the troops. Everybody knows one can not buy birth control products in a Afghanistan. lol
at 01:56 on November 23rd, 2009
Let us hope they were not impregnated near or in Falluja where there has been a huge rise in birth defects where modern munitions (depleted uranium?) have been heavily used.Apologies for going off the subject but it must be said.
at 06:43 on November 23rd, 2009
There has also been a rise in propaganda that also must be said