NP Rank:
Right wing websites spread Obamacare jail time rumor
It seems some right wing blogs have allowed a falsehood to spread like wild fire, regarding Obama's health care reform, and jail time for those who do not buy insurance coverage under the program.
Below, from Media Matters: And see this video clip (at top right)
Right-wing websites including the Fox Nation have highlighted a question asked of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at a November 9 press conference in Seattle by a local reporter who said, "Do you think it's fair to send people to jail for not buying health insurance?" In fact, the penalty under the House health care reform bill for failure to purchase insurance is a tax, not jail time, and willful failure to pay federal income taxes can result in civil or criminal penalties.
From the November 9 press conference in which a Seattle reporter questions House Speaker Nancy Pelosi:
SHOMARI STONE, KOMO 4 NEWS: Madame Speaker, I'm Shomari Stone from KOMO 4 news. I have a question for you that hasn't been pointed out but a lot of Americans feel this way. Do you think it's fair to send people to jail for not buying health insurance?PELOSI: Well the point is -- is that we want make sure that everyone has access to health care. For a long time now people who haven't had health care or provided it have placed the burden on others. Everybody is paying the price for uncompensated care-I don't need to tell you that-in a hospital. And so this is -- is to say that we all have to do our part and that is the point of the bill.
STONE: But Madame Speaker, I'm just trying to understand, if you don't buy health insurance, you go to jail? You didn't answer my question.
PELOSI: Well, the point, there is -- I think the legislation is very fair in this respect. It gives people an opportunity to have health care, access to quality health care. If they can't afford it, it provides subsidies for them to do so. But do you think it's fair if somebody says, I'm just not going to have any, if I get sick, then I'll just go to the emergency room and send the bill to you. That's my view on the subject.
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (28)
-
The_Cynic
Freddy Beach, Where the deer r, Canada
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
charliemcmillan
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (37)
at 20:58 on November 12th, 2009
More Fox News propaganda? I wonder what Mr Murdoch would think! For ... shame!
at 03:19 on November 13th, 2009
When you look at the excerpt article of the bill in the mediamatters link, it demonstrates just how complicated the Pelosi House bill is.
Pelosi fumbled also in her answer. This made it easy for opponents to attack this bill without much of a challenge.
This bill, if it passes in its present form, will be a hayday for lawyers for years to come.
at 04:29 on November 13th, 2009
My understanding, from Pelosi's version of the bill:
Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:
• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.
• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.”
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/comply-america-pelosi-care-or-jail
at 07:48 on November 13th, 2009
For WILLFUL non payment of TAXES levied. Yes the tax penalty can incur as a result of not holding insurance, but you could not have insurance and pay the tax. It is a tax provsion
at 08:37 on November 13th, 2009
If it walks like a duck, talks like duck, and smells like a buffalo, it will boil down to being forced to pay for health insurance.
Just another power grab by "liberals". Even if Pelosi puts lipstick on it, it will still smell.
Sort of hope they pass it. Should make for an interesting Supreme Court case........or a cause for the next not - so - civil war.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:40 on November 13th, 2009
For WILLFUL non payment of TAXES levied. Yes the tax penalty can incur as a result of not holding insurance, but you could not have insurance and pay the tax. It is a tax provsionRNG -I can't even believe that you would try to pass off THAT sort of BS as a rational response.It's NOT a tax provision, and I don't really care how hard you Marxists try to dress it up as one. You can put Barack in a dress, but that won't turn him into Michelle; and you can CALL the penalty for not buying insurance a tax but that doesn't MAKE it one.
at 07:57 on November 13th, 2009
Most, if not all, politicians don't answer a direct question with a direct response. Thanks for posting.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 11:30 on November 13th, 2009
Read the bill:*snip... paste*c Section 7201 - felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.c "Section 7203 - misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.I realize that it's a popular mythology that Fox lies, but the reality is not the same as the myth.
at 11:37 on November 13th, 2009
Well, W Bush has things in the Patriot Act that made people's hair stand on end. They do not ever give the extreme sentence, few go to jail, so it's no big deal. There are many things on the books that we can be jailed for, and we aren't. If Pelosi is so scary, let's begin to dissect laws put on the books by former Presidents and then you'll really lose sleep. Yes , "and/or imprisonment for up to a year" : Do you know how many laws on the books say that? There are tons. Many of them began with Reagen and got worse with W Bush.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:08 on November 13th, 2009
"Well, W Bush has things in the Patriot Act that made people's hair stand on end."I provided a direct reference.Can you do the same?
at 11:58 on November 13th, 2009
Excellent point smk.
Like rng pointed out, it is a willful nonpayment of tax. Instead of decrying the result of not buying insurance, let's look at the reasoning behind the tax. If a person choses not to buy insurance, who will be paying or absorbing the costs when they find themselves in the hospital from an accident or serious illness?
Five-day hospitalizations have been the norm for more than a decade. What has changed is the fact that the average per day charge has nearly doubled going from $2,164 a day in 1995 to $4,450 in 2008. This averages to approximately $23,000.00 per hospital stay. And this is not for a catastrophic illness like cancer or heart disease. Those can add up to hundreds of thousands dollars. How many people can pay this out of pocket? What are their alternatives? If they go into bankruptcy, the health care system has to absorb those costs, and who do you think ends up paying for it? The insured.
This is why everyone needs to be in the system. In order to do that, there must be affordable premiums. The public option can be the health insurance provider of last resort for those who cannot get insurance through their employer and otherwise would opt to not have insurance.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:17 on November 13th, 2009
"Like rng pointed out, it is a willful nonpayment of tax. "Gee, I thought Dear Leader wasn't going raise our taxes.As to your other points, medicine has gotten more expensive for two reasons. In the first place, it's gotten much BETTER. The level of technology and the ability to diagnose and cure has skyrocketed, and this costs money. So does the defensive medicine that doctors are forced to practice because we can't get any tort reform.Finally, I don't want to BE in your system. I know exactly what government run healthcare will be like because aside from the fact that I have dealt with the VA for 20 years, I can also see the mess it's become elsewhere. Again, I don't want to BE in your system, and I don't see anything in the constitution that allows the federal government to force me into it.
at 16:28 on November 13th, 2009
Tort 1% of health costs. No great savings there but a frequent erroneous assertion and makes a good talking point for the insurance companies to give you
Healthcare in the US? Most expensive system in the world. Medical outcomes? Ranks at bnest in the teens
Best ranked healthcare system in the world - France. Other top ranked systems are public/private hybrids.
While there is plenty of emotion, it is preferable to stay with facts. Fix tort you fix little to nothing about what is wrong in the system
You selective snip mixed the provision about the penalties being tax penalties at all. I know this is how the insurance companies re training you through the bought Republican opposition talking points, but there are those who see through the talking points and have the facts
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:32 on November 13th, 2009
You selective snip mixed the provision about the penalties being tax penalties at all. I know this is how the insurance companies re training you through the bought Republican opposition talking points, but there are those who see through the talking points and have the factsSo you think that I am a Republican operative, trained by the insurance companies to come here and spew Republican talking points...?I don't even have a response to that level of insanity.
at 12:06 on November 13th, 2009
Brava to Ms. A 211423!!! :) I second ALL of the above recommended! ;)
at 12:17 on November 13th, 2009
Thank you smk! : )
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:27 on November 13th, 2009
Let me remind you folks that I didn't open my mouth so that I could have a discussion on single payer health care with a bunch of Marxists. I wouldn't waste my time tilting at that windmill.I opened my mouth SPECIFICALLY because of the title of this thread:Right wing websites spread Obamacare jail time rumor And of course the first response is:More Fox News propaganda? I wonder what Mr Murdoch would think! For ... shame!Well, guess what?. It wasn't a rumor and it wasn't Fox News Propaganda. It was COLD, HARD FACT.You were wrong, FOX was right, and that's the end of the story.Now if you want to sit around and pat yourselves on the back over your support of Pelosi's 2000 page monstrosity, go right ahead. I mean, CONGRESS can't be bothered to read their own legislation, so it's hardly fair to expect YOU lot to read it.
at 16:31 on November 13th, 2009
You opened your mouth to try and make a point. You failed as you couldn't support it. There are provisions for willful non-payment of tax. There is no direct provision for imprisonment for not having health insurance. That is the fact, the rest is posturing which the media does well, and Fox is expert at.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:47 on November 13th, 2009
I opened my mouth to make a point and I made it.You can call it tax all you want, but that is, plan and simple, Bull***.It's not a Tax, it's a FINE.If you don't buy insurance you have the choice of a FINE or JAIL. Period.
at 16:47 on November 13th, 2009
Wow.......I am a Marxist. LOL
Do you know what a Marxist is? And would that be dialectical materialism or primitive communism and class struggle that would end Capitalism, and the working class would triumph. Or does the revolution occur at a certain stage of industrial society with the emergence of a dictatorship of the proletariat and result in the withering away of the state in favor of a communal relationships?
At least we gave you an avenue to vent your emotions Eric Scher because you don't know what a Marxist is.
at 16:44 on November 13th, 2009
Bravo, RNG.
Let me remind you folks that I didn't open my mouth so that I could have a discussion on single payer health care with a bunch of Marxists. I wouldn't waste my time tilting at that windmill.I opened my mouth SPECIFICALLY because of the title of this thread:Right wing websites spread Obamacare jail time rumor
And please, Eric, watch who you call a "Marxist". I respect your opinion, but let's stick to the facts: I do not like Marxism, and I adhere to a democratic regulated free enterprise, with brakes on rampant Capitalism. I am not even a die-hard liberal or Democrat; I am a philosophical and epistemic Libertarian. I hold radically conservative views on many issues, so don't tell me who I am. "Right wing websites spread Obamacare jail time rumor" is fitting and proper. I did not say anything untoward, and have worked as a journalist and a press agent for many years. Jail time is proper for many things, those which George W Bush and Ronald Reagen believed, as well as Pelosi and Obama. The 'false rumor' part is pretending this is some unique, singular event, as though this threat of jail has not sat over us with the Patriot Act and every other thing. We may go to jail, yes, now let us see what we can do to avoid it, instead of acting like hysterical, paranoid lunatics. The state is always over us: It was with Reagen, it will always be so. Read Hobbes' Leviathan, and do not bring out that 'Marxist' word, because I am not a Marxist, and will not be called one.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 17:22 on November 13th, 2009
"The state is always over us:"You've got a lot of nerve objecting to being called a Marxist when you can say a thing like that. I should be grateful though, because you save me the trouble of bothering to respond to your statement about "Rampant Capitalism". But hey... you don't want to be called a Marxist? OK, fine... No problem, Mr. "state is always over us", I'll just call you SERF.And as long as we're tossing around book suggestions, I suggest Hayek's "Road to Serfdom", Goldberg's "Liberal fascism" and Levin's "Liberty & Tyranny".
at 16:52 on November 13th, 2009
We posted at once, A!!! Yes, being called a 'Marxist' when one has presented philosophical papers refuting Marxism is just not what I am in the mood for tonight.
at 16:58 on November 13th, 2009
It's okay smk. Put down the cigarette. Eric is just in a huff because now he won't have the rest of us to pay for his hospital bills when he decides not to buy health insurance.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 17:09 on November 13th, 2009
What's that you kids say these days? "N***ah Please"? Complete with rolling eyes, right? I'm told that I am to be FORCED to participate in your socialist single payer nonsense on pain of FINES (It's NOT a Tax!) or JAIL, but I want YOU to pay MY bills?That's almost as ridiculous as a bunch of Socialists/Marxists/Communists complaining about me CALLING them Socialists/Marxists/Communists. You know what? Pick the label you prefer, I don't care.
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 16:59 on November 13th, 2009
Hey, if you espouse Marxist ideas, then you're a Marxist.Beyond that, I'm not interested in buying what you're selling.I DO owe everyone an apology for the multi-posts thought. Sorry.
at 17:06 on November 13th, 2009
He's using Republican talking points. PERIOD. Hell be FINE once he actually is a user of the system as has been the experience with health reform in other countries. I suspect that conceptualizing the reform prior to implementation TAXES many of the opposers. I don't think any of them will end up in JAIL despite what FOX tries to tell them You MARX (sic) my words
I think I got them all in there
at 17:09 on November 13th, 2009
rng
Your words are duly "Marxed."
- reply
Eric Scher (not verified)at 17:28 on November 13th, 2009
You think I'll be fine when you're done destroying the best health care system in the world and have turned it into the same abject failure that Canada & England are suffering under?Talk about delusional.I'll tell you what...How about you demonstrate that you can get Socialized Health Care right on a SMALL scale first, and THEN try it out on the whole damn country.You can start with the VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION. Get that working properly first.
at 17:05 on November 13th, 2009
Hey, if you espouse Marxist ideas
Since when does knowledge of a topic, be it Marxism or anything else, equate to adopting it? If you want to talk about some other topics of political thought, lead on McDuff!