Romney, Gingrich, Paul are trouble symptoms

by YankeeJim | January 30, 2012 at 01:47 pm
154 views | 0 Recommendations | 7 comments

Photos

Kissing Cousins

Kissing Cousins

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

They are not the troubles or the causes.

I could probably explain this with a Venn diagram. The Republican Party has at least four fragments each shown as circles. Let’s label the circles: 1) ideological and sociological religious extremists, 2) financial conservatives and government minimalists, 3) defense hawks and nationalists and 4) wealthy elitists. All four of these fragments touch one another, but just as kissing cousins.

The urban dictionary provides two definitions and I will pick one to avoid crudeness.


“A "kissing cousin" is any cousin that is not a first cousin. In most places in the world, first cousins may not have sex and have babies. But, in most cultures second cousins and higher can have sex and babies. Degree of cousinship is determined by how many generations the shared ancestor is removed from the individual closest to the generation of the shared ancestor.”


So don’t be too literal here, but I think Republicans are generally related as political cousins. Some of them have encountered Democrats along the way and may have gotten mixed up. The outcomes are like Rick Perry, for instance.

The deal is, the guys with the money, the smart guys, they are in a very small percentile. They know the only way to win elections is to develop broad appeal. So, they try to connect as many dots among the segments as they can. The poor and stupid are in one circle. The rich guys appeal to the poor and stupid by pretending to be like them – to share common values in faith and bigotry that is disguised as family values and tradition. There are some serious thinker-philosophers in one circle that are fiscal conservatives and small government minimalists and frankly there is a need for these people to keep government level headed. They aren’t necessarily akin with other circles and often work for the wealthy guys as accountants. Then there is a batch of military-minded people who like a strong defense and enjoy working in that industry so they like to see government spend money on that.

The three prominent people standing today can find alignment among one or two of these segments, though none can muster a critical mass of voters in the general election.

So this is a silly story in the Washington Post about the Romney-Gingrich split because the party is already fractured in so many different ways.

While the economy improves as some believe it will do so naturally, President Obama is going to look pretty good next year among all of the Republican rabble.


“Will Romney-Gingrich battle lead to costly split in the GOP?

View Photo Gallery — January The latest polls show former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney surging in the Florida Republican primary race.

By Dan Balz, Monday, January 30, 12:14 PM

TAMPA — Newt Gingrich has vowed to take his fight for the nomination all the way to the Republican convention in August. That may be nothing more than an empty threat by a frustrated candidate with a history of exaggerated rhetoric. But could Gingrich’s battle against Mitt Romney leave the party badly divided heading into the fall campaign?

That question will intensify if Romney wins a big victory in Florida on Tuesday. Election-eve polls show the former Massachusetts governor with a healthy lead here, though the volatility of the Republican race so far this year makes forecasting more precarious than in the past. But already the lines are being drawn over whether Gingrich, if he loses badly, should begin to throttle back or keep the pressure on Romney.

Behind in the polls the day before the Florida Republican presidential primary, Gingrich criticizes Romney's negative advertising and urges supporters to help get out the vote. (Jan. 30)

Graphic

GOP PRIMARY TRACKER: The race for delegates

Former Republican senator Mel Martinez (Fla.) said Monday that he cringes at the prospect of a lengthy and bitter contest continuing through the spring and into the summer. “It only benefits President Obama,” he said on NBC’s “Daily Rundown.”

Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, no friend of the establishment, took the opposite view over the weekend on Fox News. She accused the establishment of trying to “crucify” Gingrich and said it is far too soon to call a halt to the debate and the vetting of the candidates. “If for no other reason, rage against the machine, vote for Newt,” Palin said.

Whatever the outcome Tuesday, the Florida campaign has crystallized the battle between Romney and Gingrich. The backlash against Gingrich since his victory in South Carolina has made Romney the clear establishment favorite in a party where tensions between the party elite and its insurgent grass roots are still strong. The endorsement of Gingrich by former candidate Herman Cain, a tea party favorite, underscored the split.

Gingrich is hardly the perfect vehicle to lead a tea party protest against the establishment-backed Romney, given his record as former House speaker and later as a Washington consultant. But he has the capacity, if not the resources, to wage a lengthy and personal campaign against his rival. In the past few days, he has escalated his attacks on Romney, labeling the former governor as a liberal rather than a moderate and calling Romney’s character and honesty into question.

Romney has responded by matching insult with insult. He has belittled Gingrich as a complainer and doubled down on his attacks on the former speaker over his work for the housing agency Freddie Mac. Romney’s campaign appearances are mild compared to the negative ads running constantly on television here, both from the Romney campaign and the super PAC supporting his candidacy.

Political analysts are looking at past nomination battles for clues as to what might happen if the Romney-Gingrich contest continues unabated for some time.

At this time four years ago, Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton were waging an increasingly nasty campaign against one another, coming out of a South Carolina primary in which former president Bill Clinton was accused of playing the race card against Obama by some African American leaders. Though many predicted otherwise, Obama and Clinton eventually reconciled.”


 

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
2
"thirty-aught-six"

I could probably explain this with a Venn diagram. The Democratic Party has at least four fragments each shown as circles. Let’s label the circles: 1) ideological and sociological extremists, 2) financial tax and spend liberals and government expansionist, 3) defense doves and anti-nationalists and 4) wealthy elitists. All four of these fragments touch one another, and not just as kissing cousins.

1
"thirty-aught-six"

Declinist

1
tikun

Folks, putting poor and stupid in one circle makes the action pretty "racist"and ëlitist". This is typical Elitist thinking of the American left-wing establishment. University professors that have nothing else to do with their lives are empowered by preying on the young and teaching them the need to be the "caring Elite"of the masses. Hogwash!

 The Dems and Repubs alike are "filthy"rich, including our President.

Just because it is time for the Republican candidates to act like morons doesn't mean that the Dems are off the hook.

When you can SEE and KNOW these so-called poor and stupid Americans maybe you will see intelligent and unfortunate individuals that just are on the other side of bad brakes and at the moment unlucky side of financial opportunity. Stop with all of these false assumptions.


1
"thirty-aught-six"

You have to admit that there is something intellectually perverse about the liberals and liberal media in the perpetuation of their admonishment of the conservatives as representing the 1% and that the 1% are out to get the poor. Especially, considering that every bit of legislation Obama has brought forward has been to the benefit of the 1% and most certainly not the poor and disenfranchised. To then hear Obama giving the ocupados their props for "standing up to the man". You know the 1% went to bed that night laughing at the ridiculousness of the social-liberal mob. Thanks to the ocupados municipal taxes have gone up across the country to pay for the expanded police presence needed for the crowd management, and drug and sex crimes. The increase in fire and ambulance services call outs and the emergency hospital calls due to the drug overdoses and violence. Never mind all the public and private property destruction. Another bill for mommy and daddy to pick up so little dumber and dumber can be free to express themselves. And Obama is cheering them on hoping for their votes come November. LOL.

0
YankeeJim

Smoochy, smoochy.

0
YankeeJim

Ha!!

0
YankeeJim

Now you know I enjoy testing assumptions and they true or false until proven otherwise. 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from