NP Rank:
RON PAUL Revolutionary, Libertarian, or Mild Mannered Congressman
The Following is from RON Paul's own website, mailings, and Speeches. This story is part of our continued Know the 2008 Candidates Series.
About Ron Paul
Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation’s capital. As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Paul tirelessly works for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies. He is known among his congressional colleagues and his constituents for his consistent voting record. Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution.In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the “one exception to the Gang of 535” on Capitol Hill.
Ron Paul was born and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He graduated from Gettysburg College and the Duke University School of Medicine, before proudly serving as a flight surgeon in the U.S. Air Force during the 1960s. He and his wife Carol moved to Texas in 1968, where he began his medical practice in Brazoria County. As a specialist in obstetrics/gynecology, Dr. Paul has delivered more than 4,000 babies. He and Carol, who reside in Lake Jackson, Texas, are the proud parents of five children and have 17 grandchildren.
While serving in Congress during the late 1970s and early 1980s, Dr. Paul’s limited-government ideals were not popular in Washington. In 1976, he was one of only four Republican congressmen to endorse Ronald Reagan for president.
During that time, Congressman Paul served on the House Banking committee, where he was a strong advocate for sound monetary policy and an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve’s inflationary measures. He was an unwavering advocate of pro-life and pro-family values. Dr. Paul consistently voted to lower or abolish federal taxes, spending and regulation, and used his House seat to actively promote the return of government to its proper constitutional levels. In 1984, he voluntarily relinquished his House seat and returned to his medical practice.
Dr. Paul returned to Congress in 1997 to represent the 14th congressional district of Texas. He presently serves on the House Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. He continues to advocate a dramatic reduction in the size of the federal government and a return to constitutional principles.
Congressman Paul’s consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, “Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers’ ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.” Another colleague observed, “There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.”
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
South Carolina Offices:
Columbia 1911 Hampton Street
Columbia, SC 29201
803-931-8096 - phone
Contact Ron PaulWebsite http://www.ronpaul2008.com
The Above is not an endorsement of the candidate, but a autobiography by the candidate himself.
I'm Albert N. Milliron from http:/www.Politisite.com and I didn't endorse this message!
Crowd Power
-
Albert Milliron
Columbia, South Carolina, United States -
LibertyManiacs.com
Sauk Rapids, Minnesota, United States











Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 08:22 on January 2nd, 2008
politisite, important information - but it would be worthwhile to see how it all stacked up against the facts of the matter.
at 11:10 on January 2nd, 2008
Ryan:
Since you have been reading my work here on Now Public, I do
analysis on candidates. I usually do this work by interviews
that I do myself. I don't like third party work for my
articles. I wanted to present each candidate in a non -debate
forum so folks could get a perspective from what the candidate thinks
is important and some background history as well.
I could have used the tool you have to direct
one to the website of the candidate. I didn't do that because
the reader would think, "oh another Ron Paul Guy pushing his
candidate."
I have posted aricles making sure the folks know where the info
came from and didn't try to pass it off as my own. My work has
been stolen by the Main Stream Media (MSM) following an interview
with my name or site no where to be found. (e.g. Chuck Norris Interview) I don't do that.
You know that I have done the same with two other candidate from
both parties. I will implement your advise for the next.
I am trying to get this all done before Iowa (impossible) but
will at least have it done by the time we have our South Carolina
primary in middle January.
I appreciate your feedback. I just wanted you to know my
rational. Most folks in the USA couldn't even name the
candidates except for the top ones. They will be last on my
list.
I have enjoyed posting to this site. You are now getting
most of my stuff. I have used and still use a few other sites.
A Google search on politisite will show that I am an active writer.
I am 100% disabled veteran and work from home.
Thank You
Al Milliron
at 09:02 on January 2nd, 2008
Because this is from a candidate's website, and hence is public relations, wouldn't it be better to file this under Press Releases? I can see, though, why this is something that is actually Politics Press Releases, although there's no such category.
Politics news would be news.
I'd like to see someone analyze what the candidates have done compared to what their websites say.
Since it's a copy-and-paste from the website, would it be better to use highlight? Staff!
at 11:05 on January 2nd, 2008
PEP:
I think Politics is where this article should be. I am
highlighting each candidate from their own view. I am doing
this with all candidates from all major parties with no
editorializing. I spoke to the question of highlighting in the
previous email. I didn't want reader to say, "Another Ron
Paul Fruitcake trying to push Ron Paul on us."
If you have read my work in the past, I do analysis on
candidates. I do this from my own interviews with candidates at
debates or on the trail in SE USA. We also do polling.
If I have broke the rules in the, "Highlighting" I will
not do that again. My intention was not to put up a story
of a candidate I like, but rather to put up stories of each candidate
that isn't getting attention. Rather then the readers having to
find each website, I tried to put the information in one area.
I am not allied with any candidate. I am a member of a
political Party and have been a Public Relations Chairman for that
party. I do not endorse any candidate in the primaries. I
will endorse the candidate for my party.
I try to be objective. As you know this is very difficult.
I go to Both parties debates and report on them.
One thing I added to this story is the audio of Ron Paul leaving
the Debate in St Petersburg Florida at the last debate. The
audio was put there to show a different Ron Paul than what we see on
stage. This Audio is my quick interview with him.
Thank You for the input. If I have crossed any lines, please
email me at my listed email address or call me via telephone.
Thank You
Al Milliron