Rush Limbaugh Attacks Obama over Pirate Shooting

by Blue Crush | April 16, 2009 at 06:06 am
2175 views | 79 Recommendations | 47 comments

While most are praising US President Obama for the way he handled this latest pirate attack, Rush Limbaugh has found yet another way to attack him. 

He mockingly called the pirates "merchant marine organizers," and said "imagine the hue and cry had a Republican President ordered the shooting of black teenagers on the high seas."

Videos

Keith Olbermann: Rush Limbaugh Using "Race Card" on Obama

see larger video

sourced by Blue Crush

Keith Olbermann: Rush Limbaugh Using "Race Card" on Obama

While most people celebrated Obama’s authorization of the shooting, radio host Rush Limbaugh yesterday used the showdown to smear Mr. Obama’s name. Via Limbaugh’s website:

They were kids. The story is out, I don’t know if it’s true or not, but apparently the hijackers, these kids, the merchant marine organizers, Muslim kids, were upset, they wanted to just give the captain back and head home because they were running out of food, they were running out of fuel, they were surrounded by all these U.S. Navy ships, big ships, and they just wanted out of there.  That’s the story, but then when one of them put a gun to the back of the captain, Mr. Phillips, then bam, bam, bam.  There you have it, and three teenagers shot on the high seas at the order of President Obama.

Limbaugh went on to say he believes Obama wouldn’t have given the order had he known the boys were Muslim: "If only President Obama had known that the three Somali community organizers were actually young black Muslim teenagers, I’m sure he wouldn’t have given the order to shoot. That’s the correct way to look at it. If only Obama had known."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
7
Jordan Yerman

Limbaugh's argument here is silly. After all, he firmly supported the unprovoked invasion of an entire country, so his credibility here is... insufficient.

6
jhazell

Rush is a fat, angry, bigoted, windbag and by his need for attention and to justify his miserable existance he'll say any ignorant and stupid thing to get people riled. He and his species of racist dinosaur will slowly die off as time goes by. Best use him as a low water mark for teaching our children about ignorance on the airways and in the media.

5
albertacowpoke

Rush is interested in making money.  This makes him money.  Having this very public fight between Rush Limbaugh and President Obama only diverts attention from the real issues.

4
nyctuber

Limbaugh is idiotic, as are the vast majority of wacko Right Wingnut commentators. They appeal to a dimwitted demographic, and are just rendering themselves irrelevant. I'd bet some of the crackpot Righties are even getting tired of Glenn Beck's 24/7 scare tactic temper tantrum.

4
Roy C

Point well made, Amy, but calling Rush fans "idiots" is a way to label any Rush fans here as idiots. I listen to him. I can find him annoying, but, as Camille Paglia said, the right has the better political commentators. And Paglia is definitely on the left.

We call this insulting by proxy. Suppose Queenshart had said that people opposed to Rush were idiots? Not OK. Then not OK to label Rush fans "idiots", either.

As a centrist, I am going to say that the left has a bit more narcissism than the right. Not an easy thing to do, by the way. But I have my "metrics".

4
nyctuber

The only pain as I see it is submitting onseself to that base level of a Rush Limbaugh. These types were branding Obama a 'Socialist' and tossing out the juvinile scare tactics before the man even entered office. I think it's absurd that anyone takes them seriously, especially after 8 years of a Neocon nightmare.

4
nyctuber

Yes of course it was, it always is. It's always the exact same nonsical argument, Bush can rip up the constitution, cripple stem cell funding.. but Obama will always be 'worse.' Bush's deficit doubled all previous deficits, and his budget didn't even include to cost of IRAQ. Obama's first task is to pump trillions into the Neocon Depression Economy to stop the bleeding. If people don't like it, they should at least blame the administration which created it. TARP began under Bush, was that due to Obama's polcies? If  GW were still in office, would he doling out trillions to prevent a collapse? Of course he would, he'd have little choice. At least Obama's vision, which is FAR sighted. lays down massive investments in infrastructure. All Bush did was lay down infrastructure in Iraq. We got ZERO for it.

4
nyctuber

I don't know where you intend to buy the magic wand, but 8 years of Neocons has done serious damage and the 'let them fail' bit doesn't convince me personally.

I just really can't buy into the idea that people who were content with Neocons running the USA as a for profit private war machine corporation are suddenly outraged at 'both parties.' It's too Glenn Beck, it's almost corny. The fact is we have a two party system, if someone wants to change that I'd be open to a third party, but there are Party lines and  it's one or the other. I'm not voting for any Republicans, knowing there is a 95% chance that they'll tamper with things like abortion rights, federal stem cell funding, and will come down on the side of Big Oil and pretend Global Warming is a myth. And they still seem to think Supply Side Economics works, but it never has.

4
nyctuber

That's such a touching story. All those xenophobic, anti-abortion, anti-gay rights, anti- stem cell funding bible thumpers magically disappeared when you passed by! I hear violins, do you hear violins? Anyway, back on Planet Earth, Republican ideology is bankrupt and a large number of your midwestern brothers in arms were solidly behind McCain/ Palin continuing the Neocon preemptive war loving, Big Oil loving, anti- abortion anti-gay way of doing things. No thanks.

4
QueensHart

I think most people who like to denigrate him and others have actually never listened to all in context.  I never listened to him until I retired.  Some days he is silly, entertaining and others he is fantastic and very insightful.  It is actually a realistic point he makes.  Bush would have been criticized about this pirate situation too.

Going out on a limb publicly and speaking honestly takes real balls.  It is easy for us to say stuff here but would you discuss as you have here    in person ?  Forums allow people to vent!  It is a good thing to vent!  It is kinda like journaling only anonymous (mostly) people will hear you.  Everyone needs to be heard.  We do not need to be afraid of intense expressions do we? I respect the rules here but I still say let us duke it out!  I apologize for assuming Tuber is in pain and my last sentence . I am guilty there. I do not apologize for calling him a name for calling "all republicans/conservatives wingnuts.  That was on point but the rest I did go too far.

It is difficult to get past prior conditioning about anger.  Our society does not give people permission  to express anger.  The main reason they hate Mr. Limbaugh.  We have more permission to cry than to express "righteous" anger.  Generally when one does express anger they are labeled as "out of control"....a "bitch"..."hot head".  I remember the first time I expressed anger in a healthy way to my son's fourth grade teacher.  I was intense.  When I finished and started to apologize he said, "you owned your statements. You did not attack me"  ..  Those teachers are savy on issues of anger management and language.

It's fear .Yes, people who are vulgar, nasty , dishonest must be bammed for sure.

If we can stay on point and slap back once in awhile I say( as a psychologist) it is a good thing.  People are so afraid of anger.  This is one of the reasons  Rush is ostracized by the "heart on  your sleeves lefties".  They want to talk softly and never fight.  Freedom of speech includes expression of all . Philosophy is what rules  countries.  We come here and must agree to disagree.

I hear what you say Amy  but why did you allow Tuber to say what he said too?  I suppose you can't monitor this every minute etc.  It is a rhetorical question of course.

I encourage anyone reading this to go to this site discussing Anger is Healthy.



4
Pythiian1

Limbaugh will criticize/attack President Obama about everything and anything regardless of logic, facts, and common sense.  He wants to spike his ratings.

4
nyctuber

Um, Rush Limbaugh is a hateful professional shill. I don't need a condescending irrelevant lecture on 'anger.' Perhaps you are the one in need of therapy.

3
Roy C

"One makes sense, the other doesn't. Stop wasting my time."

This is another example of an unncessarily personal comment by you and a clear violation of the code of conduct here, NYCTUBER.

What is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Get with the program. You have insulted us twice in this thread.

3
Roy C

Believe it or not, there are actually people who don't want Bush or McCain or Obama. You and many others seem to think that these are only choices.

What limits you to such narrow dysfuntional thinking? Obama is Bush's spending programs writ even larger and Obama kept Gates and is going into Afghanistan without any real European help.

What change does that represent?

I want all troops home out of all foreign countries yesterday and on the border to stop the drug smuggling and the violence.

I want the drug program that Bush passed rescinded. I want the rich to pay for their own medicine. No more Social Security for them, either, and no medicare.

I want the Medicare to negotiate prices for the drugs with the drug companies, and not let it be determined by them. Has Obama said anything about this? That whole thing was pure insanity, but Obama, by not mentioning it ever, has given it tacit approval.

I want the jobs back from China. I want energy independence. I want a new third party and I want the Fairness Doctrine declared unconstitutional. 

I want all the TARP money back and the financial institutions permitted to fail and I want all the executives' pensions seized under SEC rules that have to do with fraud.

3
tikun

Who cares what Rush or anyone else says about the messiah. He is the MAN..The light and the path toward only god knows where?

3
tikun

Hi NYCTuber,

Having grown up in the Bronx and spent most of my early life in NYC, including university I received a rude awakening one day hitch-hiking across America.  There are people in the heartland that actually love their country and love their life styles. Not afraid to serve in the Armed forces and volunteer in their religious institutions to help the needy. What a concept. If these are the stupid, naive, foolish, idiotic, less-then-normal, Americans that watch Fox then I am with them. They may not be flashy or intellectual snobs but a heart felt concern for freedom, as they see it, is sincere. 

Maybe not my cup of tea but nevertheless they are a real, genuine, concerned and honest folk that keep America churning so that we big-city types can rip on them with our myopic way of seeing the world from "our" parochial view out of the 20th floor on Madison.

3
albertacowpoke

I.m ready to offer my referee services. 

3
Donovan

Rush is a fool, he will find anyway he can to disagree and insult the president. I think he is just bitter about the loss for the republican party. Oh and by the way, Josh Sucks.

3
nyctuber

A lot of them are miserable weirdos. Did you check the 'tea parties' they're comparing Obama to Hitler,and worse. The racism and hatred is boiling to the surface. When the President (Bush) starts doing the bidding of religious nuts by banning stem cell funding or trying to legalize discrimination against gays, it's a problem.

2
Karen Hatter

Mr. Limbaugh's comments were an interesting and bizarre observational assessment. 

2
Blue Crush

Thanks for commenting.  Notice how he gets  the words black, muslim, and community organizer in there?  Silly and bizarre as it is, it's also scary how he has so many viewers!


2
Roy C

The pirate problem for Obama has only begun. There will be no negotiated solution. Shooting these men has only inflamed the problem, yet that was the only thing to do in the situation.

Now Obama has to deal with a situation that created the "Blackhawk Down" scenario.

2
Roy C

Of course, Amy. It was pure Rush, whose commentary looks as good and bad to the right and the left as Olbermann's does to the left and right.

Tuber, calling fans of Rush "idiots" is just like calling Olbermann and Maddow fans "idiots". Now, what good did that do?

2
nyctuber

One makes sense, the other doesn't. Stop wasting my time.

2
QueensHart

You know what Tuber?  You just reveal what a whack job you really are to call all

conservatives Wingnuts.  There are nuts on both sides.  Go out of your little circle of

people and meet more Americans.  You might be surprised.  You have a lot of pain to

hate so much.  I am sorry you feel the way you do.  It is not fun.

2
Amy Judd

Please don't be so personal in your comments, it's against our code of conduct.

2
colejv

I agree with Roy C and NOT with nyctuber. I don't believe people who listen to Rush or Glenn Beck are "nutjobs" or are a member of the "dimwitted demographic". (nyctuber did however solidify my perceptions of those who are left of center.) Rush and Beck do a great job of providing material for listeners to research themselves.

2
nyctuber

You addressed your comment toward me, I wasn't talking to you. I voiced my opinion toward the story, which I'm free to do. Enough already.

2
Roy C

Here is the word from Camille Paglia on the right-wing nuts. She is probably one of the last real libs around, as opposed to modern libs who are the harbingers of left-wing authoritarian culture, a la Chavez and the Castro bros.

Sensible Liberal: Camille Paglia

Camille_Paglia Salon editorialist Camille Paglia might very well be the last remaining liberal in the true sense of the word—as opposed to the liberty-suppressing “progressive” leftists who now occupy the White House and dominate both Congress and the mainstream media.

Why? Because Paglia is actually a liberal/Democrat who opposes the “Fairness” Doctrine! I know, I know, you’re shocked. I was too.

The blog Freedom’s Lighthouse posts this statement by Paglia:

If there’s anything that demonstrates the straying of the Democratic Party leadership from basic liberal principles, it’s this blasted Fairness Doctrine—which should be fiercely opposed by all defenders of free speech. Except when national security is at risk, government should never be involved in the surveillance of speech or in measuring the ideological content of books, movies or radio and TV programs.

Broadcasters must adhere to reasonable FCC regulations restricting obscenity, but despite the outlandish claims of Democrats like Sen. Charles Schumer, there is no analogy whatever between pornography and political opinion. Nor do privately owned radio stations have any obligation to be politically “balanced.” They are commercial enterprises that follow the market and directly respond to audience demand. The Fairness Doctrine is bullying Big Brother tyranny, full of contempt for the very public it pretends to protect. […]

Instead of bleating for paternalistic government intervention, liberals should get their own act together. Radio is a populist medium where liberals come across as snide, superior scolds. One can instantly recognize a liberal caller to a conservative show by his or her catty, obnoxious tone. The leading talk radio hosts are personalities and entertainers with huge rhetorical energy and a bluff, engaging manner. […]

Talk radio is a major genre of popular culture that deserves the protection accorded to other branches of the performing and fine arts. Liberals, who go all hushed and pious at Hays Code censorship in classic Hollywood, should lay off the lynch-mob mentality. Keep the feds out of radio!



And here is her own view of Ms. Couric:

Paglia even explained why liberal talkers continue to fail on radio:

The leading talk radio hosts are personalities and entertainers with huge rhetorical energy and a bluff, engaging manner. Even the seething ranters can be extremely funny. Last summer, for example, I laughed uproariously in my car when WABC's Mark Levin said furiously about Katie Couric, "What do these people do? Open fortune cookies and read them on air?"

2
Yuliya Talmazan

Interesting take, Blue Crush. The Somali pirates are definitely not seizing ships for fun, but out of dire need to survive. However, in this situation, I doubt there was any other way out.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karen Hatter
First Flagged at 6:49 AM, Apr 16, 2009 by Karen Hatter
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (79)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from