A safer society? Legalize drugs

by joellerose | August 23, 2008 at 06:23 am
739 views | 49 Recommendations | 22 comments

Photos

A safer society? Legalize drugs

A safer society? Legalize drugs

see larger image

uploaded by Barry ORegan

Opinion. I would never criticize Mitt Romney for changing his mind about what the proper role of government is regarding abortion because I have changed my mind a couple of times over my lifetime. I also have changed my mind about how to deal with drugs.
"Thirty-five years into the "war on drugs", the United States still has a huge drug abuse problem, with several million problem users of illicit drugs and about 15 million problem users of alcohol. Illicit drug-dealing industries take in about $50 billion per year. Much of the retail drug trade is flagrant, involving either open-air activity or identified, dedicated drug houses. Flagrant dealing creates violence and disorder, wrecking both the neighborhoods where it goes on and the lives of the dealers. Chronic heavy users of expensive illicit drugs steal and deal to finance their habits. Drug injection spreads HIV and hepatitis-C.

On top of all that, we have a highly intrusive and semi-militarized drug enforcement effort that is often only marginally constitutional and sometimes more than marginally indecent.11. That enforcement effort keeps about 500,000 Americans behind bars at any one time for drug law violations, about 25 percent of the total U.S. prison and jail population. A larger proportion of U.S. residents is doing time for drug law violations than is behind bars for all offenses put together in any country to which we’d like to be compared." The American Interest 

It’s pretty obvious to many people that our war on drugs is a losing proposition. Prisons are full of drug offenders, but large areas of most cities are off-limits to all but those pursuing the drug trade as sellers and buyers. The amounts of money involved lead to carnage on our streets and corruption in our criminal justice system, while every day’s newspaper brings another story of innocent people murdered because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time or killed in a traffic accident by a druggie. The author of this article makes a good case for legalization; I agree with him as long as some of the savings go into enforcing public intoxication laws to keep druggies off the streets, and severe penalties are imposed for DUI’s.

A safer society? Legalize drugs

By Bill Fried | June 6, 2006 Boston.com (Excerpts)

"Eddie is an addict and a seller. He feeds his addiction by stealing, often violently… He did prison time, where taxpayers fed and housed him and gave him a stigma that made it virtually impossible for him to re integrate into society upon his release. Except as a drug dealer.

He is part of an established food chain, an elaborate, international protection racket. To defend his turf -- maintain market share -- he joins an armed gang, as does his connection, as does the syndicate that supplies his connection, as do those who protect the producers.

At every stage, corruption and violence. Elements of the police and military look the other way. Selected judges and politicians look the other way. The great source of drug demand, the United States, hops into bed with drug runners to pursue its geopolitical aims. Billions of dollars slide around. Those who don't have their hands out have their hands tied. Those without connections get hounded and jailed….

His failure is defined as a personal one; his usage is defined as criminal. He may be arrested, put in expensive jails, and guarded. Meanwhile, politicians puff sanctimoniously about ``cleaning the streets" and ``ridding the projects of drug dealers."

But, in fact, we know that he'll be replaced, as will every corrupt person in the entire international supply chain. There will be inevitable ``personal" failings all up and down the line. The incentives and despair are too great.

But what if we step back and take a radical new look at this, what if we dive down to the epicenter and pull the plug from this dysfunctional vortex? What if we legalize and control the drugs in question: marijuana, heroin, cocaine, to name three? Clinics could dispense these drugs affordably, and some of the $69 billion that Law Enforcement Against Prohibition documents we spend on ``enforcement" and ``interdiction" could go to treatment , for which there is already unmet demand. For the kids, hip anti drug messages could parallel the successful anti-smoking campaign. In the absence of prohibition, drug use may actually decline among the young.

What will our society look like as we transform outlaws into clients?
There will be millions of people on drugs.

There are currently millions of people on drugs.

But there would be significantly fewer human tragedies; fewer broken lives and families; less crime on the street; fewer people in jail (especially minorities); less State Police and State Department corruption. We would live in a safer, gentler country.

Many drug addicts will be cured and live normal lives.

Many will never kick the addiction but will live mostly normal lives, like functioning alcoholics; holding down jobs, remaining in marriages, and raising children; a monkey on their back, but getting by.

And many will remain mired in drugs. They will consume drugs as the morbidly obese consume food -- until they self destruct. Even with legalization and control and all the support in the world. Some folks will simply fail, and their failure will be a small though intense tragedy. But it will be theirs and that of their families. Not ours. Not everyone's." Boston.com

For a comprehensive discussion of all aspects of drug use and the consequences of drug law enforcement in America go here.  


 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
René
René
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:13 on August 23rd, 2008

The privatised prison and jail system needs non-violent offenders, usually drug offenders, usually marijuana offenders, and prefers to keep them as inmates while paroling out the violent ones, as they cause too much trouble.

Also, the huge system for processing offenders on both sides of the law would put many out of work if drugs were legalized.

Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:19 on August 23rd, 2008

I agree. The only accomplishment of the "war on drugs" is a swollen prison population. Instead of wasting public funds on prosecuting teens with weed, surely we should be raising tax money off of it... after all, DUI/public intoxication/family abuse laws are already on the books. (This post is also proof that no one political wing "owns" a given social-issue stance)

Albert Milliron
Albert Milliron
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:27 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.  I am a conservative who believe's in legalization of soft drugs.  Alcohol remains the most dangerous drug in use.  It accounts for most drug related emergency room admissions.  Alcohol can and is used by many in moderation.  Only 8-12% of the populations develop an issue with dependance in their lifetime


PEP
PEP
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:28 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Uwe Paschen
Uwe Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:30 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Great Post!

0
joellerose

Thanks for all the GS tags.  If I surprised you, don't forget that I consider myself a moderate conservative, but definitely not a RINO.

0
PEP

What's a RINO?

0
joellerose

A Republican In Name Only.  One who ran as a Republican, but then votes to help Democrats pass liberal legislation.

0
PEP

Thanks for defining that! Interesting. Where I live, the Republicans rule. So many people who want to get active in politics, or run for anything, just routinely go re-register as Republican.         ;}  Makes for interesting issues!

pseudoKu
pseudoKu
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 08:55 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
anarkissed

This discussion is tired and hashed and old.  When will it lead to action?  Here in Canada we got extremely close and then some whackjob took down our prime minister in a bizzare scandal involving people other than himself, but for which he was held responsible for the sole reason of being "in charge".  The one in charge of the department where the scandal occurred got his job!  That was the end of the legalization initiative...

Now tell me there isn't a lot of money behind the continued prohibition?



0
joellerose

That may be, but a lot of well-meaning people honestly oppose this initiative.  They have to be convinced without accusing them of corrupt motives.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:38 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Emilio Lizardo
Emilio Lizardo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:55 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Makes perfect sense !

Here's hoping that someday a profound miracle occurs and government actually does something sensible for the people it is sworn to wisely govern and protect - here's hoping they someday agree with the logic of your article and the thinking of many, many others as well !!

Barry ORegan
Barry ORegan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:47 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff. I am pretty anti drug as most know, so I will just say, I have seen more lives destroyed, innocent lives due to drugs and drugged out parents with kids.,,,.MMM kay!

0
joellerose

That may be, but it is no argument against legalization.  I hate drugs.  I lost a daughter to the ravages of drugs and alcohol.  She had been sexually molested as a child.  I believe we will have many fewer problems with drugs if they are made legal.

0
Albert Milliron

Well, I see you have the good discussion thread of the day!  Billions of Dollars leave our countries by having drugs illegal.  Violence is increased as well. Bottom line is what we are doing is not working.  Glad your Not a RINO.  I know that from reading your work.  Because we are conservative does not mean we agree on every issue.  Folks call me far right wing.. but they don't know what far right wing is.  I am a right Libertarian.  So I am conservative on most social issues, fiscal, and defense.  But on the death penalty I have changed my mind and on drugs I have changed my mind. 

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:55 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. the greatest drug dealer:  war. Drugs against weapons, the CIA is the good Hamburger helper. A civil economy would replace drug dependance by creativity.

0
PEP

I am truly so torn about this issue. I find drugs abhorrent in every way. I've never tried any form of drugs--no, not even grass--and I don't want to. (To be abosolutely truthful, I've heard that grass may help migraines, and when I've been in the grasp of a really bad three-day migraine, when the meds don't work, I have wondered--but as soon as I get a little bit out of the migraine zone, I shudder at the thought of having a migraine AND being stoned.) Drugs are a curse upon our society. And all the time, more dangerous and sinister drugs get created and sold.

I wouldn't mind de-criminalizing marijuana, with the caveat that anyone involved in an accident where they were proven to be stoned (or suspected, with grass in the car at that time) should a) lose their license immediately and b) spend at least some time either in the local jail or in a work-release program with weekend jail time and c) be required to attend a court-administered substance program that includes time spent in the ER and visiting substance-related accident scenes. BTW, I favor that for DUI as well. You drive impaired, you pay with your license and jail time.

However, how can we de-criminalize meth, crack, Ectasy, or other drugs? When we de-criminalize, we as a society basically say "hey, this is OK, sure, have it in your home, have it at your parties, just have it." And I think the dangers of drugs beyond naturally-created grass are just too darned great to tolerate as acceptable. And let's face it, booze isn't nearly as dangerous as meth, crack, angel dust, etc. etc. so the old saw of saying "well booze is legal so anything should be legal" just doesn't apply, IMHO.

All that is my opinion, and no doubt, worth exactly what you just paid for it!         ;}


0
Mikasi

Pep, I look at this from the opposite place where you do - when young and stupid I would have tried just about anything except mainlining. From experience I would say that pot is far less dangerous to others than alcohol. But then beer and rum always landed me in more trouble than pot - drunk driving as opposed to staring at my palm and wondering why I don't just observe the beauty of my hand more often.

As for your caveat concerning stoned driving I say "hear hear"! Being stupid may be a God-given right, but operating a motor vehicle is not. Even if you have the right to destroy your brains with drugs that does not allow you to destroy mine with a ton and a half of rolling steel.


0
joellerose

I think anyone who thinks seriously and honestly about this issue would have reservations about legalization, but it has become very clear that what we are doing is failing in every way.  Legalizing, distributing and taxing certain drugs is the lesser of two evils.  I would treat manufactured drugs the same way the federal government treats unlicensed stills.

Mikasi
Mikasi
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:43 on August 23rd, 2008

joellerose, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from