NP Rank:
San Francisco Bay area schools to phase out gay curriculum
ALAMEDA SCHOOL BOARD IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA VOTES TO OPT OUT OF GAY CURRICULUM, TO BE REPLACED WITH GENERAL ANTI-BIAS PROGRAM NOT SPECIFIC TO GAYS........................
In a vote by the Alameda Board of Education this past Tuesday, the "Lesson 9" curriculum to prevent bullying of gay students has been replaced by a broader program. The San Francisco Bay area schools will use a broad anti-bias program instead of the more gay-friendly one.
The vote has caused conflicts and threats of lawsuits since Tuesday.
Gay parents in the community wanted their children protected from bullying, while other parents argued that elementary school is too early to talk to students about gay people.The new anti-bullying lessons approved by the board, at the recommendation of School Superintendent Kirsten Vital, will be supplemented by children's books that explicitly address six specific forms of bias, including against gays.
"This has torn apart our community," said school trustee Trish Herrera Spencer, the board member most opposed to the gay curriculum and who opposed adding the supplemental books. She said the board's latest action did not take into consideration "the strong beliefs" of all in the community.
The 45-minute Lesson 9, which was to be taught once a year in each grade starting with kindergarten, sparked a lawsuit, accusations that religious families were being discriminated against and threats of a recall election against the three board members who approved it.
Vital said her recommendation was meant to counter complaints from parents opposed to the original lesson because it highlighted only one type of bullying.
"There is not an off-the-shelf, perfect curriculum that is going to work for our community," Vital said, explaining that she wants to solicit book recommendations, bring them back to the school board for approval in a few months and then work with teachers to develop accompanying lesson plans in time for the 2010-11 academic year.
Several parents said they did not trust a teachers' committee to pick books that would both satisfy gay and lesbian parents and parents with religious views that do not condone homosexuality.
"Freedom of religion is protected from harassment and discrimination from anyone. It may be of no consequence to some, but it is a very integral part of many traditional families and should be honored," said Kellie Wood, who has three children in Alameda schools and is part of a group circulating recall election petitions. "If we're all honest, the friction between two protected classes, in particular, will not go away."
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (6)
-
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (10)
at 15:49 on December 10th, 2009
Bullying in schools certainly includes those who are gay, but it also includes many others who for no other reason than "being there" are bullied every day in schools. I had a child that was bullied for no apparent reason except that he happened to be the one chosen. It's a broad spectrum problem that also can include harassment of girls and racial and religious differences.
What needs to be honored is the right of every student to go to school without fearing being bullied for any reason, and for parents to know their children will be safe on the way to school, in school, and on the way home. Laws should cover a child from time they leave their house until they get home. I was told years ago when this happened that the school was not responsible for the child once they left the school grounds, and they could not take any steps to reprimand the bullying child or call the parents. If these rules are still in effect, they should be changed.
at 16:24 on December 10th, 2009
Oh, I am sorry, A, that your child was bullied! We had some incidents with our son, too, and it made us very angry, because he would never be unkind to any living thing: Those are the ones they target. Yes, there was a case a few years back, you must have read of it: A 13 year old boy hung himself, after months and months of merciless bullying at Junior High school, and they indicted the MOM, because she worked long hours, and the house got messy, and his hygeine was poor. So instead of looking to what went on during school, they charged an overworked single mother. Who was already insane with grief. Is that justice? it made me ill.......
at 20:04 on December 10th, 2009
I was not aware of the case you are speaking about, but indicting a single mom does not surprise me. This is the punitive society we live in.
at 16:34 on December 10th, 2009
Would you believe that there are gay bullies too? Imagine that!
at 20:08 on December 10th, 2009
eastvanray
My previous comments spoke to the spectrum of bullying, and the most important part of this argument is to recognize that the problem is non specific and affects many types of children and adults and in all environments.
at 16:39 on December 10th, 2009
Exactly.....I myself used to be bullied by a gay co-worker, he was mean as could be.........
at 16:47 on December 10th, 2009
Addendum: This change should not hurt gays---anti-bias and anti-bulllying ought to protect ALL from a - z
at 18:43 on December 10th, 2009
One item of significance missing from the article is, the fact that parents who did not want their children indoctrinated, were NOT allowed to opt their children out of the class.
In other words - WE (the schools) - not the parent - will teach your child the values WE want. How very, very, arrogant of them. No wonder the school board was alarmed about recall votes.
at 18:53 on December 10th, 2009
So why did these school trustees get elected (re-elected)?
at 19:03 on December 10th, 2009
Same reason most politicians get elected. Folks vote on image, many issues never get brought up until after they are elected. Think our current president would have won if folks had known what they know now? With a 46% or 43% approval rating, I doubt it.