NP Rank:
Sarah Palin: Obama wants to “control the people”
by TheCameraObscura | June 5, 2009 at 02:08 pm
530 views | 52 Recommendations | 25 comments
Following a report on how South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford has finally accepted $700 million in stimulus money for people in poverty and education via court order by the South Carolina Supreme Court, MSNBC reported that Sarah Palin now believes that President Obama is trying to "control people" with money.
Alaska’s Republican governor Sarah Palin warned her supporters that the Obama administration wants to “control the people” by giving them money.
“Friends, we need to be aware of a fearful population and fearful lawmakers being led to believe that big government is the answer to bail out the private sector,” she said. “Because then government gets to get in there and control it and, mark my words, this is going to happen next I fear, bail out next debt-ridden states, then government gets to get in there and control the people.”
Republican strategist John Feehery, invited to respond by MSNBC host Monica Novotny, suggested that maybe, just maybe, the Obama administration is running some kind of evil conspiracy.
“Do you agree with Sarah Palin that the government is planning to bail out states so it can ‘get in there and control the people’?” asked Novotny. “It sounds like an evil conspiracy.”
“Monica, maybe it is,” he said. “I do think that the Obama administration represents a much more activist government. I do believe they are going to dictate a lot more how we want to live our lives. I also think they want to expand greatly the power of the government over certain sectors. [...] Of course it’s part of a bigger plan. The president actually campaigned on it. He’s campaigned on a much more activist government. I’m not sure it’s conspiracy or not.”
Crowd Power
First Flagged at 3:24 PM, Jun 5, 2009 by Amy Judd
These members have powered this story:-
TheCameraObscura
Los Angeles, California, United States -
QueensHart
boston, USA., United States
Recommendations (52)
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States -
Jarrett Martineau
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (25)
at 15:52 on June 5th, 2009
If the governor is trying to position herself for 2012, it does not help to use fear and doomsday to appeal to the American public in 50 states.
at 16:50 on June 5th, 2009
Christopher Lasch, one of America's best students of its culture, wrote two books on the same subject.
The first, The Culture of Narcissism, deals with how the state and corporate America have overtaken the family, undermined authority everywhere, especially in the family and in schools, made work dumb and dumber...
While in his last book, finished just before he died, The Revolt of the Elites, he makes exactly the case the Palin makes: that the elites, through their love of big government, in association with big money corporations, is actually the most anti-democratic element in today's society.
And it is all rooted in the successor to the old-fashioned, neurotic personality you had when you were raised by an authoritarian family.
Now, instead, real feeling is avoided, anger, especially, and we mediate everything in relation to images, a pseudo-reality that people who work all day in offices prefer to the real one.
Lasch took his Marx and his Freud very, very seriously.
And, if you don't approach Obama's programs with decided skepticism, a real "where's the beef? " approach, you can be swept up in his real capacity to inspire.
To this date, his programs remain very unpopular while he remains highly-rated by the electorate, just as the Muslim world likes Obama but wants to see real change, and remains skeptical.
One last most important point: the reason that Mexico and Italy got mired in corruption is that the government owned the banks, the newspapers (almost all), some of the car companies, their oil companies, the universities and even the TV stations.
What happened?
Hell, there is no one outside the web. Corruption grows as every contract becomes padded with kickbacks, and the government does a rotten job of investigating itself.
Whether Obama wants to control us or not, the logical, reasonable expectation from having all this power is to use the power to resist opposition to his policies.
And, while Obama may not be that bad, precedent has been set for a situation just like in Mexico or Italy, with the same outcome.
Imagine "ACORN" write large.
at 19:07 on June 5th, 2009
While I agree with your overall premise, I think when u try to compare other nations with North America, meaning USA and or Canada, I like to think that essentially people can think for themselves.
Obama has been in power just over 5 months, people are still giving him the benefit of doubt. This is understandable. Most of us require a minimum of three months to to get comfortable with a new job.
In the military we used to get detailed handovers with briefing notes and the staff of the guy that preceded us. Nevertheless it took a good three months to feel comfortable, despite the fact that this was just a continuation of something we had trained for all of our life.
My bigges critique on President Obama would be that he has tried to move too fast on many issues without a plan. GITMO is a good example of this. As a consequence some of the European allies have now decided to accept any GITMO detainees unless the US shows that they are willing to take some of them themselves.
Obama wants to push through a Health Care Plan by July. This would be ill advised. Universal Health Care can work, but let.s study some of the lessons learned by those of us who already have it and wouldn.t be without it.
Canada, Britain and nations into the EU have gone through a lot of growing pains to try to get our system right. Why not take the time and study them.
There is an old German saying and Ronald Regan used a version of it
His was trust but verify. The German version is Trust is good, Control is better.
Essentially all governments want postive control over their agenda to move it forward. Obama sees an opportunity and he will try to advance his while he retains the 60% plus popularity. Whether you agree or not, you can't blame him.
He knows that the Republican party has been highjacked by the far right (Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck), and he will take advantage of it while the GOP tries to redefine itself. That is politics.
at 17:02 on June 5th, 2009
Palin would have been in favor of limiting rights to gays and women in need of abortions as VP. The Republican approach is now to simply accuse Obama of everything which Bush/Cheney got away with. The GOP is a sinking ship, good riddance.
at 20:20 on June 5th, 2009
#1: gay rights are up to the states.
#2: abortion is not usually a "need" ... sure, sometimes it is necessary for the health of the mother, but it is usually (overwhelming majority) a "want" and not a "need" ... i personally think that abortions should be taxed heavily. (4000/day x $8000/each) x 365-days-a-year = you do the math, a lot of money !!!!!
and don't forget, according to "science" and "biology": Life begins at conception.
... by the way, i'm not a Republican or Democrat. I have problems with both parties, but i do think that Republicans could potentially be the "lesser of two evils" if they mature a little (or a lot), and it is possible for Palin to win 2012, especially if Obama doesn't live up to people's expectations.
at 20:25 on June 5th, 2009
4000 abortions per day in America, taxed at $8000 each = $32 million per day ...
$32 million x 365 = about $11.7 billion per year
at 21:04 on June 5th, 2009
Bush endorsed a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. Palin certainly would have favored such an amendment.
Palin is asserting the absurd notion that Obama is trying to 'control' people, yet has no problem with forcing her religion-based control toward curtailing human rights.
Abortion is absolutely a need.
According to science and biology, there is no consensus about when life begins.
at 17:14 on June 5th, 2009
So, that doesn't mean that Palin isn't right about Obama's plan, and the nefarious effects of owning banks, owning car companies, bailing out the newspapers, silencing talk radio, setting up his "volunteer" program, and otherwise using up all the wiggle room left in the US.
Palin is not in power, and, so, the issue is: what ways are the powers of the peopel being limited by the policies of Obama?
As I said, Mexico and Italy and everywhere else where the government controls the banks and the media and most of the major manufacturing companies, there is total corruption.
Good riddance to the sinking ship of the old time republican party from me,as well, but that doesn't eliminate the problem.
The democrats are equally capable of screwing things up.
at 21:32 on June 5th, 2009
You don't apologize, and you don't engage. You seem to simply attack from the position of someone possessed from within by a malign anima, a misbegotten sense of Eros. You write as if you were Perez Hilton's press secretary.
The left-right paradigm is the favorite of people who can't grasp the beauty of F. Scott Fitzgerald's comment about the intelligence needed to hold two opposite ideas in one's head at the same time. They are enamored of orthodoxy and need to run inquisitions to help keep the anti-depressant charge from getting dissipated.
The left-right paradigm lets you NOT THINK. You just consult the field manual or pull out the rubber hammer and hit your right and left knees, and- the answer gets tapped out.
People don't hate to think because thinking is work, though. They hate it because they don't know how to bear the work of the rearrangement of the emotional structure underlying all that orthodox crap they genuflect in front of in order to have a social life and "fit in", while, in the case of the men, the women secretly despise the castrati and cheat on them.
Hey, hey, but why abandon the Titanic? The party just got started.
at 07:56 on June 6th, 2009
Roy C 1, notgayeither 0.
at 13:47 on July 5th, 2009
Your observations about the bogus "left/right" categorization of the political professionals who have been entrusted to run our country are right in line with mine.
My view these days is that we no longer really have a two party system, but instead we have one party with left and right parts. The real ideology promoted by both halves is controlled by one group of powerful people. Under the control of this shadowy group, the left and right parts engage in a choreographed East German Stasi-like "directed conversation", wherein each takes an opposing part as if they were actors in a session of public televisions old "Firing Line" broadcasts.
One side (the left) supports a sort of socialist-fascism with a strong, public-face control of much of society by the government, while in actuality the country remains under the control of the previously mentioned group.
The other side (the right) supports a sort of fascist-socialism, with a weak public-face control of much of society by the corporate sector, while in actuality the country remains under the control of the previously mentioned group. Reference to weak a public persona of corporate control is due to the fact that the ultimate control is corporate, but generally denied in public.
Hence, one party.
at 08:00 on June 6th, 2009
80% of people in America believe in restrictions on abortion. As far as gay marriage goes
each state can do anything they want. Gay M. and abortion have nothing to do with
the economic maelstrom which Obama has conjured with his unbelievable plan.
Added a little entertainment for you on this administrations CHANGES.
at 09:18 on June 6th, 2009
Oh please, the banking meltdown started in mid 2008. Obama wasn't President back then.
It was all this wonderful dereguation that Bush and Cheney promised that opened the door for fraudulent morgages and banks turning into investment houses.
at 11:08 on June 7th, 2009
It started then but if the Rx doesn't work, then that will be the Bush-Obama Rx that didn't work.
Obama is the prez and it is his job to fix the problems, not make them worse.
at 07:46 on July 21st, 2009
"Oh please, the banking meltdown started in mid 2008. Obama wasn't President back then."
Partially correct.
Obama did not start the banking meltdown, which began when America sold it's fabled "means of production" to foreign interests. American people, those with less than CEO management status, saw their jobs exported, and were henceforth unable to make mortgage payments.
This started thirty years ago, when America still reigned as the driver for the world's economy because it had retained it's fabled "means of production".
Whoever has the most efficient "means of productions" will be the driver for the world's economy. I suppose that implies China is now the driver for the world's economy. But wait a minute, "They are an authoritarian dictatorship!" This implies, unfortunately, that to emulate them, and thus compete in the new "global economy", we must immediately form Gulags in every country, and begin to pay low-level communist worker wages everywhere.
"But wait! We have!"
Recovery is just around the corner ...
at 08:35 on June 6th, 2009
Palin simply is saying whatever sounds good to appeal to the lowest common denominator to keep her national hopes alive as her popularity and effectiveness in Alaska craters.
She began as a liar.
She will end as a liar.
at 11:52 on June 6th, 2009
Oh please back.. It was the democrats Frank , Reid, Pelosi who contributed to this and
Clinton approved measures that affected this situatiion. You need to do some reading sir...esp
about the mortgages. Everyone is guilty ...ALL OF THEM... EVERY ONE ....IN WASHINGTON... AND ...................LIARS AND GREEDY BUSINESS PEOPLE
TO CONSTANTLY BLAME TWO PEOPLE IS IDIOTIC.
at 12:15 on June 6th, 2009
at 12:15 on June 6th, 2009
"Oh please back.. It was the democrats Frank , Reid, Pelosi who contributed to this and Clinton approved measures that affected this situatiion.. . .
TO CONSTANTLY BLAME TWO PEOPLE IS IDIOTIC."
[Chuckle}
See, you have to blame at least four for it to count, and they have to be approved by the GOP party boss and chief dope addict, Rush Limbaugh.
[chuckle]
at 08:11 on July 21st, 2009
It's a childish game being played against children, and the children always fall for it's ruse ...
The memory span of the zombiefied American public (probably the same applies to the populations of other countries), is so short that the same unmodified child's prank-game works again and again.
And again.
The whole exercise related to "the blaming of the latest party to assume power" is just a distraction designed to force the children into a perpetual game of tic-tac-toe, where the outcome always goes to the cats.
And nothing ever gets done.
The distraction is needed to prevent our eyes, ears, and minds from forming the otherwise inescapable conclusion that it's not a particular party that's at fault.
It's the system.
A system, that for all intents and purposes, has become a single party system, with two halves, each playing a provocateur's role in engaging the blame of the public.
Alternatively.
And then it repeats ....
at 12:28 on June 6th, 2009
Read again...
"Everyone is guilty "...I said...you got some projection going on in the screen of your brain.
As sooon as you THINK a comment is a "right winger" you put up a smokescreen and
and presss "attack button"....Learn to look ...read...............educate....look , read...educate.
Democrats and Republicans both are guilty and are imploding....BOTH .
Bye now.
at 12:42 on June 6th, 2009
[chuckle]
at 01:13 on June 7th, 2009
Code of Conduct.
This is an emotive topic, clearly. Please all remember the code of conduct when commenting and responding to other members. Thank you.
at 11:01 on June 7th, 2009
In summation, Palin is so much a pit bull as a pit viper.
at 11:11 on June 7th, 2009
Code of Conduct.
"This is an emotive topic, clearly. Please all remember the code of conduct when commenting and responding to other members. Thank you" by GeneraldeCay
Thank you too GeneraldeCay My apologies for over reacting.