NP Rank:
Save the British Culture - Take note politicians
I am very disturbed by the influence of alien culture in my country we have now nationalized people given the full rights of an indigenous British Citizen. Why when most of these nationalized individuals follow a culture that is alien to the original British Culture.
The present administrative government has in fact bent backwards to please non indigenous minorities and allowing them to bend our laws to meet their cultures. The problem is that some have cultures that are bent around their alien religions. We have allowed unlike the nations the original nationalized aliens come from, to buy property and to create alien ghetto’s within our main cities. They have not integrated with the indigenous natives just segregated themselves. That of course to my mind defeat the object of immigrants wanting to be British as they certainly do not want to do what the Romans do and interlink properly and take on the British culture. They and their of springs can not truthfully be called British. As they are in fact still part of the culture they have immigrated from.
They have then given the rights to be part of our British political system. Some of these nationalized aliens have been given noble titles so they can sit in the House of Lords. Why have they been honor so and above any indigenous native that should only be the ones to be recommended?
These non natives should have been granted residence only unless they married a British national. They should not of been allowed to vote nor hold a political post of authority. Because they have the original culture in great Britain has been lost. People like myself born to at least one British parent and brought up in the original culture are of course annoyed knowing not many cultures outside our own would entertain such powers given to Aliens of another race. We are not talking about any form of racial hatred but a sensible reaction to a destroyed culture allowed to be over run by non indigenous people.
I personally do not recognize any alien race as being called British; I have British blood, look British and have had a long British line of ancestors. What consecutive governments have done is lost British Patriotism and gain a troublesome melting pot and people that want to change our laws and culture to suit their own. They have however failed to melt within the race mixing pot. This means their cultures are separated and in accordance with the country they or their parents and elders originated. That can not be called British.
I know belong to a nation of multi cultures with many being very alien to my understanding. I personal would like to see the laws and conditions changed to suit the indigenous native, whilst the indigenous native is the majority.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Sam_Butler
Manchester, United Kingdom -
rchappo2002
Rochester, New York, United States -
sonykus
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania -
Merchant Venturer
United Kingdom
Recommendations (18)
-
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
israeli.agent
India











Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (21)
at 10:04 on October 23rd, 2009
You sound like Oswald Mosley
at 10:34 on October 23rd, 2009
No I don't I am not racial in my opinion and the here in the Philippines I am exactly limited to the pointers given in my article. There is no real racial intent here other than protecting the Filipino culture. What I am suggesting is the law within many of the nations UK immigrants have migrated from.
As for no racialist intent I live and love with a colored British non national...
So please get that idea out of your head.
at 03:48 on December 6th, 2009
You sound like you have your head in the sand. Wake up my friend. Or are you truly that not bothered about your children's/grand children's future?!
at 10:14 on October 23rd, 2009
Don't you think it will be a good start if the Brits kick out all Sri Lankans who live there on the dole? Approximately 93% Tamil and 7% Sinhala and others.
The rest can follow.
at 10:36 on October 23rd, 2009
We are not talking about kicking out anyone just changing status from nationalized to resident it also does not effect benefits.
So please get that out of your head
at 10:18 on October 23rd, 2009
I think Britain is just paying the interest for the historical debt they took from other countries.
I need not elaborate much, but, yeah I am talking about the once vast British Empire in which the Sun never sets. Using by the hook and by the crook methods, at first the British East XXX Company and then the Her / His Majesty's rule looted many other countries and brought suffering to many millions of people. Looted 'entire' natural and other wise resources of countries and destroyed many cultures (India, Sri Lanka and Nations in Africa are examples).
They artificially altered the demographic situation of many other countries so as to protect their self interest (Sri Lanka and Fiji). In what happened in Sri Lanka was they imported Indian workers and Malay attackers to destroy the indigenous Kingdoms.
The space in the entire NP is not sufficient to describe how many cultures were destroyed outright by the British Imperial forces.
As we all know, History repeats itself and now what is described in this story is a great example for that truth.
Mahatma Gandhi, a very peaceful soul and almost a saint , once forced to say these words.
"If we Indians could only spit in unison, we would form a puddle big enough to drown 300,000 Englishmen".
I think the "Alien Cultures" are exactly following that now. It is too bad that the current generation of "Native" Britains have to face the puddle. Very few of them have any direct responsibility on what the British Empire did to its former Colonies.
.Agent.
at 11:04 on October 23rd, 2009
That is propaganda in fact most of the empire had its infrastructure improved vastly, education and health was improved, yes minerals and products where exploited but much was changed and civilized. Places like Hong Kong, Singapore became rich and prosperous. Africa however was never improved that much though it was left far better than it was when first exploited. Asia did very well...
Propaganda does mean half truths, lies and some truth but never the real facts. Great Britain though exploited brought civilization and improvement to infrastructure to most of the world. One only has to look at India and its rail roads to see exactly what I am saying.
But my article and the problem of culture change by immigration and instant or nearly instant nationalization has nothing really to do with what your saying in your comment. It actually started because a requirement for cheap labor to run the underground, buses and rubbish collection etc, in UK. The jobs that no one else wanted to do. Jamaicans were the first real influx of Immigrants actual recruited in Jamaica. That by the way had a very good infrastructure and good education introduced whilst Great Britain was in power there.
Oh by the way most of the resources where left behind and such things as Rubber trees and coffee crops were left behind after being introduced as a cash making set of crops. Farming was really improved and the proceess of introducing democratic governance and training military forces plus local police was carried out prior to each nation be hand over to its people.
Sri Lanka tea plantations and infrastructure plus its rail roads made Sri Lanka a profitable nation as with most of the nations handed back to the natives. of whom I must add where mostly prior to so called exploitation running around in loin cloths.
For each bad there was good.
at 12:01 on October 23rd, 2009
Babel Fish,
For each his own good and his own bad.
I am not trying to hijack this thread, but must clarify certain things - from my perspective.
You say that most of the empire was 'civilized'. With due respect, many of the empire were already great civilizations for thousand years before the colonization started. As you said, in commercial and economical terms yes, the colonization had made changes and yes, railway, police system, tea plantations are all welcome.
Yeah, the Brits left rubber trees and coffee plantations behind only because they exactly could not take them to Britain..! Unlike Kohinoor diamond.
But for people prosperity and happiness does not come from just money, trains or tea. There are other aspects like spiritual and emotional awareness and at the end how one is being at peace with him/herself. This non-economical aspect gets deleted when a culture is gone.
Did the empire do this as a goodwill gesture to it’s colonies?
Having said all these, I must disagree with your assessment on what kind of jobs Asians ‘traditionally” do. Not only the stereotypical garbage collection bus conductor jobs, but jobs like doctors, nurses, and teachers too goes to ( to a great extend ) non native Britains, right?. Yeah, who can forget Gurkha regiment and other non native army units of British army?
If we take your argument of infrastructure development as an example, how the development of Japan can be explained at the time of WW2? How are we sure that other countries too would not have developed the way Japan developed if left alone?
I know these are hypothetical questions and we can’t exactly turn the clock back. But in the same token, the change Great Britain undergoes now too is very difficult to check. I don’t like it, but I don’t like the how the Empire changed our countries as well. Believe me; the change happening in Britain is inevitable.
.Agent.
at 10:57 on October 23rd, 2009
I agree with you, Roy - revenge did not work and should not work. But my comment was just a reminder of what pain people have to endure when they see their own culture gets destroyed aliens. History is riddled by examples. Cultures had been destroyed by aliens - Mongols, Arab Invaders, various European conquerors etc. How pagans would have felt when their religions wiped out by Christians? Every Indian (for that matter everyone who were once under colonial rule) somewhere in his / her subconscious mind carries that scar. When do introspect, we always know that there is a major part of 'us' is missing somewhere. We know, but we don’t know what that is. This is the missing link - the emptiness - every Indian carry.
I see the same pain in Babel Fish's words and was trying to explain what it is. No, I do not advocate destruction of any culture.
.Agent.
at 11:27 on October 23rd, 2009
The point is most nations in the third world are trying to hold on to their culture, in fact Britain did little to change religion if it had there would be no Islamic followers in most of the middle east. Indian religion was left much intact etc. etc, etc. But the Spanish and the Portuguese are the ones to blame for really changing cultures and religion. Britain is very innocent of that in fact cultures where enjoyed and much left alone and that's why most within the old empire are still alive and well.
I wrote an article about how the Spanish tried to eradicate the writings of a very illiterate race of people, yes here in the Philippines where all the natives used to leave notes for each other and write poetry on bamboo in a language call baybayin of which has since been revived by academics. The Spanish declared it as being pagan, forbid it and destroyed every copy that they could find.
Yes the British did exploit and after helped each nation to survive self autonomy.
at 12:36 on October 23rd, 2009
Without delving in nitty-gritty of the how much the benefit or for that matter loss was incurred due to colonial rule, I would simply like to humbly submit a few points as food for thought:
at 17:52 on October 23rd, 2009
Britain brought civilization but mainly respected the original culture and religions where as countries like Spain imposed their culture and religion on to native populations and infused some of the original culture within the imposed religion.
Missionaries were sent to the colonies by Britain's religious groups, however no politic motive went behind the conversion of natives in spreading the words of Christ. Thus leaving the original cultural religions intact.
What has attracted people to British shores has been the streets paved with gold syndrome. aprox. 60% of the those that migrated thought they could achieve a better life for themselves and their families. There is a big percentage of immigrants that came to abuse the benifit system.
Globalization is why these immigrants arrived on british shores, however the problem is not that but the fact they have been allowed to persuit a cultural take over.
at 10:52 on October 25th, 2009
"Britain brought civilization"
You truly make me laugh.
at 12:51 on October 23rd, 2009
Another observation is, who is encouraging vote-bank migration to Britain and other western countries? Who gives the firebrand imams license to run around?
The kind of immigrations happening - in the majority of cases - is not an elaborately planned or deliberate activity. In cases they are, it happens only in a very subtle way.
More importantly, what Mr. Smith is going to do about that?
.Agent.
at 12:57 on October 23rd, 2009
The economics behind immigration may also be a reason why everyone wants to stop it but no one can aford to do so! Report
at 17:57 on October 23rd, 2009
The Mr Smith's will be riled up by a racialist national group and the countries political system will become National supreme based. That's the problem of allowing immigrants full nationality and power to their own religious cultural beliefs.
at 17:24 on October 23rd, 2009
What is British? Is it not some thing in constant evolution?
The First People of The British Isles would strongly disagree that there is a British culture or that this one was their own.
The Germanic Clan of the Anglo Saxon that find their origin in Germany's very own Angle Saxen and Saxony invaded the British Isles and pushed the indigenous people in some cases to the bring of extinction.
The Languish it self evolved over the past 2000 year from its Germanic root and mixed with a strong influence of French over the past 1000 years.
At least the Immigrants come in legally and not as Germanic or Roman invaders. Killing the natives and suppressing them to their rules by force.
Even the Royal House in the UK is Germanic for the most part. King George the III was the first British King to actually speak the English dialect and not only High German and Parisian French as all Kings before him did.
Maybe the Germanic invaders from 40 BC and 200 AD, or rather their descended should go back to Germany and give the land back to the Scots and Walloons as well as the Irish...
at 17:27 on October 23rd, 2009
Seen this argument before, the mongrel one, but its completely the wrong slant. Yes the ingenious natives care, they do have a culture it dates back centuries. The original blood courses through our veins the mixed race of our British past made us a European breed.
The culture is defiantly still there though adapted its certainly a white European culture, with traditions related to the original settlers the Ancient Brit's.
Its very similar to the Philippine culture a Polynesian and Asian mix polluted though by Spanish European blood. But they too are worried about losing a cultural identy. They have done something about it to ensure the culture melded as ours did over many centuries. Now global migration has become a threat to Britains cultural identity and the white european mongerals are very annoyed to see our country being reshapened to please non European minorities that can not even be considered as British as they do not intemingle within the gene pot. They are natives of non european countries of whom have cultures that do not entwine with ours and have been allowed to run rough shot to over whelm.
The main point is they are in Rome not doing what the Romans do and have been allowed to take over large areas of native Britian. We could not do that within their original countries and its normally much much harder for us to be nationlised if we so required.
United Kingdom is not the only european nation that has this cutural problem and please take it out of your mind that there has never been a British culture as that is just not true. I have seen the slow eradication and its a great shame. I was born at a time when Britain still lived by its culture and now see that culture being abused and changed into something else by a bunch of loonie politic motivated cronies.
What I don't want to see is racialist Nationalism raise its head and the predictions of Enoch Powell come into fruitation. If this present trend goes on for much longer the British with white European blood will join BNP in droves. Because non natives cause this to be so by achieving to much change to suit their own cultures and religions.
at 17:45 on October 23rd, 2009
Babel, your fear is that of every generation faced with changes and lacking the ability to evolve and adapt.
The Culture you speck off is based on the Victorian era and the 1960s, wish was contested all the same by the generation of your parents and grand Parents.
I am not saying that changes are always good or even bad, they simply are and those that are born today will complain in the same manner once they reach their 50s or 70 about the changes they witness them self compared to what they have been raised with.
Some change are bad of course and others are good, however, the changes are inevitable and holding on to some thing that can not be constant is futile and in many cases driven by fear of the unknown and a lack of open spirits and a lack of tolerance.
Every country is faced with this and some deal with it rather well and others do not deal with it to well. Those that strive and progress have learned to accept it and deal with it in a constructive way.
Those that have failed to accept it through out history and tried to remain stagnant in their ways and culture have extinct then self. Once culture is not a constant and will always be dynamic if it is to survive it can only do so in part or it will vanish all together.
at 18:30 on October 23rd, 2009
No get that out of your head, when I was young the culture was not Victorian based it was modern England. There we had a nation that culture had been changed by a very violent world war. Life was based around communities and it was a fish and chips in newspaper and sing songs in the local pub society. Football was the sport of the masses, the elite of course had their tennis and cricket.
Hell its hard to explain but we certainly had culture and a national pride even though the Great was taken out of Britain. religion played a little effects on the British way of life People where hospitable street parties were great and the local public houses a social meeting point.
Laws were seemingly geared to logic common sense, one wore your best clothes on Sunday not to go to church but to go on picnic, a ride in a car or on a bicycle.
Our society had wandered far from the Victorian and citizens had the power to vote and change the country to suit the British workforce other than just the elitist possibly living in a Victorian past. Them days immigrants from Europe melded into our society and made no attempt to change our British culture. Even ate fish and chips on a Friday night like a native.
I have notice that your perceiving that old fashioned American view of Britain that gave a wrong impression of what Britain was like after the fall of its empire, well actual when we hand it back to its owners.
No your so wrong. lol
Cultures do change they do intermix slightly but they should not be overwhelmed by a culture foriegn to the original cultures nature. I certainly would not like to live under Islamic law or even Jewish or christian law and have to live a religious based life. That's what is actually brewing in UK today the Muslim national see the world as a temple and what UK to be part of that temple. It's leading to a very dangerous situation and it was clearly very stupid to allow natives from Muslim states have full British National rights including being elected into our parliment. They are gaining power as each year goes by and it is in deed overwhelming the native indeginous cutlure.
at 21:09 on October 25th, 2009
test cricket is boooooring….ss s..s...ss.s; ....what I like to see in the grounds is either an hopeless terror supporter with a dirty old ltte flag or an civilized naked british fan breaking this dull evening… ... nappppp sssss