Sean Hannity interview with George Zimmerman
In the Old West they called them lynch mobs in 2012 it's called the rush to judgment!
In the case of an unfortunate shooting where a brutal personal attack led to the use of deadly force, I think that a scapegoat has been created by the mainstream media, racial opportunists, and the Democrat party. Yet, mo matter how wrong the party was that initiated the assault, a martyr is likely to materialize out of these distortions and lies. George Zimmerman stands to fill that tragic role.
After watching Sean Hannity’s interview of the embattled George Zimmerman I came away with some very distinct impressions, but first I’d like to preface this with the events that led up to this looming travesty of justice.
It’s obvious that no one wants to deal with the tough questions that revolve around this case such as what was a 17 year old young adult doing trespassing in a gated community on a rainy evening? The parents, who are so grief stricken apparently had little control of their teenage son who was apparently out at night without reporting his whereabouts. Neither did Trayvon Martin’s parents seem to be able to quell the drugs and violence that was present in the boy’s life. Was this negligence on their part?
When President Obama weighed in on this incident and further inflamed the division of hatred by saying that Trayvon Martin would have looked like the son he had never had, two things became crystal clear. 1) This was going to become a racially charged affair. 2) Obviously the President of the United States of America who had a chance to quell the unrest would instead inflame it by using the death of Trayvon as a political moment to further his cause of intended subterfuge when he just as easily could have helped relieve the growing tensions.
More questions arise from the liberal press handling of the story which instead of a tragedy seems perfectly qualified as an opportunity for the President, the leftist US media, and racial opportunists everywhere to capitalize on the someone else’s pain. NBC was caught twice altering taped conversations between Zimmerman and the police in order to make it appear that he was profiling Martin. NBC employees were rightfully terminated for it after 2 attempts at distorting the case.
The very first witness, a young black woman, testified that she watched Trayvon Martin attack George Zimmerman. Why was she never interviewed in depth by the press or police? Several other witnesses said that they has heard screams but did not know which person was doing it. Why did the press corps portray Trayvon Martin with his pre-adolescent photos which depicted him as a child in contradiction to the towering menace that he had become according to those who knew him.?
This is the anatomy of social unrest from the very manual of “Rules For radicals” by Saul Alinsky who advocated any kind of treachery, deception, or subversive behavior in order to obtain the ultimate goal which would justify the means used to attain it. In America we are no longer concerned with what is clearly right or wrong because it is now subjective it depends on who is influencing the arena. Should the federal government do its job or is the interpretation of the law at left up to each successive administration that can influence the outcome? That is the answer in today’s world. Right and wrong are simply negotiable especially when it involves people’s lives. Where does the life of George Zimmerman fit in?
On a footnote: to date 4 witnesses have no been persuaded to change their eye witness accounts of the incident which began with one single eye witness, who implicated Trayvon Martin, to now other witnesses who did not see anything but heard indistinct screams, now changing their stories? What does that mean?
We know that George was attacked when simply asking someone who shouldn’t have been where they were at an inappropriate time at night, in the rain, what they were doing. What was the response? A man acting as a security guard was nearly beaten to death, and when the attacker went for the holstered firearm of that security guard action was taken that forced the situation into the implementation of lethal force which led to the death of the assailant, Trayvon Martin. These are the simple facts and the outcome. Yet, political factions, the media, and racial activists want to turn it into something else, and a man’s life is at stake for it.
Now, in the interim, 4 witnesses have been convinced to change their stories and the judge in the case has acted politically instead of ruling as would be the case in so many related shooting and unresolved trials. A reasonable bond would be set for even hard core criminals that didn’t deserve it because it happens all the time, yet because it’s an election year and there is political leverage in this incident the judge has denied George Zimmerman his due process of law and unreasonably set a burdensome amount while worse offenders have been saddled with much less. Why? Because Zimmerman is a prize! George Zimmerman can be utilized for his value as a hostage for liberal advantage, this sacrificial lamb will help further the cause of racial division that the left needs so badly in an election year!
Getting back to Sean Hannity’s interview with George Zimmerman, I was impressed that Hannity may very well have consulted authorities on pursuing the proper line of questioning in a potential homicide case. Second degree murder is not a conversational subject. Sean was careful, precise, and to a degree, sympathetic. I saw nothing wrong with his line of questioning. I myself though must ask the following questions.
Why would Zimmerman even apologize for killing Trayvon Martin when all indications are that he fired in self defense? I’m sure he was urged to do so by his counsel. Attorney Omara, who was by his side, but not overly cautious or protective. It was as thought they felt confident that George has a very good case of self defense, and in most cases would.
For the very first time it was brought out that, thanks to Sean Hannity’s patient demeanor that as Trayvon Martin not only beat George, tried to close his mouth with one hand which was causing even more pain for Zimmerman since the first blow struck by Trayvon had broken his nose, that he was attempting to suffocate and silence the neighborhood watchman. It wasn’t enough that Trayvon had punched his face, slammed Zimmerman’s head on the sidewalk, and was now clamping Georges’s mouth shut over a fractured nose, Trayvon spotted the hand gun on Zimmerman and was going for it. That was when George said he unholstered his firearm and struggled with Martin who had also grabbed it.
Now, here is the part that within seconds changes the entire complexion of the incident from assault and battery to second degree murder charged to man who was attacked and almost beaten to death. Trayvon, according to Zimmerman intended to grab the gun and would have shot George but for Zimmerman struggling for control of it with him. Then the pistol went off. George Zimmerman said that suddenly the struggle ended with Trayvon was just sitting there telling the guard he had beaten and assaulted that it was him (George) who had gotten the gun first. Then Trayvon Martin collapsed. George said that at this point he was not sure if Martin had been shot or given up the attack, but in the stunned mind of a man who has been beaten senseless, had his nose broken, bloodied, is suffering from head trauma, that this momentary confusion is understandable. Zimmerman mentioned that he had screamed out several times trying to lead the police to the scene of the ongoing assault as Trayvon Martin pinned him down and beat him unmercifully.
The liberals, Obama supporters, and race baiters like Al Sharpton who has been in Florida doing everything he can to incite unrest and hatred are going to lambast George Zimmerman for saying that this all happened according to God’s plan as though God would condone a killing, but this is their intended misinterpretation. Zimmerman is basically saying that the approaching outcome of the trial is in God’s hands for lack of a better word according to a man who has suffered greatly at the court of twisted public opinion. Hannity was fair and allowed Zimmerman to talk without interruption as opposed to any other obnoxious and biased leftist reporter who have interrupted Zimmerman repeatedly, tried to be judge and jury right there on the spot, or would try and provoke Zimmerman into making awkward statements in lieu of trick questions. To hsi credit, Sean hannity did not lower the standards of the interview to that level.
I think it’s safe to say in one of the most biased and politicized cases of murder in a long time, we have seen the Democrats, blacks, and racial provocateurs conduct a aggressive campaign of blame and rushing to judgment all in the name of obtaining a political objective and using a beaten married man and father as their burning effigy of half truths and scapegoats.
And I will add, shame on you, Mister and Misses Martin for not only refusing to accept George Zimmerman’s apology when you, yourselves should be asking for the forgiveness of society for the way you allowed your son to victimize others and then attempt to capitalize on your son’s tragedy once prompted by the leftist community to do so. This is an unconscionable act of profiting from the death of a son that you did not control and teach better. Such is the growing disconnect between the criminal acts of youths today in the absence of responsible parenting. So we allow the government to get involved and attempt to exercise its perverse form of authority upon those we refuse to teach ourselves. As a result, this, more often than not, is what happens.
In the arena of public manipulated opinion or politcal correctness, it makes no difference that George Zimmerman passed several lie detector tests conudcted by authorities or a vocal stress test. Zimmerman in his interview evn added that the prisoners who knoew of his story actually sympathized with him and showed signs of support as they are well aware of what can happen when being legally framed for an act you are innocent of.
George Zimmerman would never have been brought to trial years ago, but today the court of liberal public opinion eclipses the court of law, and that’s when politics black the sun from shining before our eyes with the clouded misdirection of lies. That is what the Trayvon Martin incident is all about.