In search for the truth, a global meltdown theory

It's the China plan Bob. Lower prices are better for an economy...even if there is a lot of unemployed....because people can afford them. .. Lot's of jobs at high inflationary costs to the people is more trouble which causes people to lie...and fudge the books for more and more....scams and heists of peoples money.until a banana costs $1000 dollars....

China is not going around the world causing wars, and wanton conditions. It has always been a country that works within. Some call it protectionism, but I don't...it is management at its ideal. Countries should use this opportunity to build their own infrastructure and create jobs. You have always heard the saying the grass is always greener on the otherside of the fence. So that is NAFTA for you....... The problem with NAFTA is that only countries with high populations and low wages benefit, because they can flood the markets to the countries with the highest currency values, and make their money.. The countries with the high currency values are unable to trade in the undeveloped of lesser valued countries because the people have no money to buy the high price value on their goods....So who loses? Yup! The USA and Britain, and Japan.....the high currency countries.

The best the West can do is devalue their ideals so production costs are similar to China's means to pay for such goods....this is the shock that is taking place now. Truely material things need to be at a low cost...and this means Oil prices as well. Things are then stabilized and then maintained for longevity....and trust is assured.....The other way is greed upon greed upon greed....and causes much instability and shocks.....the rich get so rich...they have no idea where to put the money except into Ponzi Schemes......

I think this will come out OK....with this common sense of reason.

Rev. Jermano

 The west will gradually chip away by gradually increasing tax on imported goods that can be manufactured at home and give tax incentives to manufacturers that start producing new competitive items also the value of not having to stock pile imports that items can be supplied at home direct from the conveyor belt, governments will start to advertise the value of home grown good. The be a patriotic buy goods manufactured at home, they are better quality. 

China has already preempted the problem and been for sometime now concentrated more on selling there own products to their own citizen and also looking at markets in Asia. It knows its has to slow down its growth in the global market and concentrate more nearer home.

America has started by blocking out sourcing it knows its got to bring manufacturing at home, and this new manufacturing base has got to be eco friendly and new eco energy is a top priority.

I actual think this shifting could of only been done under a social democratic administration as that type of administration would not cower down to right wing capitalistic interference by the multi-national corporates that will be more interested in their own profits and futures than patriotism to any set nation.

Things have to change and a capitalistic administration would be under too much pressure to do so.

I am now looking at something that a canadian handicapped citizen journalist "Donna  Doreen" quoted the other day on her column on another news community.

"It almost seems as pre-planned on a global scale(simultaneous) as 9/11 was in NY." 

I am beginning to think what we are seeing now has been pre-planed and now part of the global chess game. It's almost like look we handing over this to you as we could not be seen to be swaying to the center line and hurt our capitalist supporters and sponsors. So we let the problem get worst even pretended it was not important and did not really matter too much. Obama its now your baby promise not to hurt our puppet masters to much and when we take back the seat of power we will leave most of the status quo alone.

Donna Doreen a Canadian citizen journalist sparked of the inspiration behind this article and made stand back and view the global picture. .  

Here is some more of my thoughts honed through debate else where...  . 

The global chess game is not a new game, its the game the elite have been playing since the roman empire laid down the rules and politics was honed into a hotbed of corruption, lies, half truth and snake oil. The wheels of administration are greases with the money from the rich merchant, businesses and landowner its become more sophisticated as more global players have sat at the chess board the big winners get bloody noses the powerful block and are held in some form of Mexican stand off till the next dirty trick is played. It was called the big game by the British and they where experts in scull thuggery.

When US took over the power mill, it became a game of cat and mouse during the cold war. Its the same game just different players its about money power and control.

9/11 changed the game to hunt the terrorist and hide the global moves behind the war on terror smoke screen i am not saying that USA was behind the terror it self but 9/11 gave an opening for US to block uncontrolled oil and gas supply to China. Of course nothing is done that does not have a big dollar label stamp of approval.

But the question must of been itchy about the 3.5 trillion dollars owed to China with a ever increasing unsecured credit and loan problem at home. At a guess 9 trillion or so including US security promises for credit related debts in overseas banks.

A republican administration could not move to center line politics (social democratic) but of course the democrat's would find that simple. The beauty is the money owed to China was mostly US securities in banks all around the globe at a guess. The other guess is many nations have had to buy up the US securities by buying the banks and it helps them in the field of big brother. lol

It was planned.. had to be its too off pat!

What can we world citizen do...? (Question from Donna)

What ever we do, the chess game can not be stopped as it would need every world citizen to be away the game is being played and as the players are from differing nations with differing views and differing methods of indoctrinating their citizens. By stopping one player we could let a player win and place the power in the wrong hands and who's hands could we trust anyway?

We would need a world government but would that work at present United Nations does not follow the original plans its just another place for nations to argue and where one party levers the real power.

One religion and one political system is the answer but that's never going to happen without force an a war to end all wars. I would not want to wish to be fulfilled and all we can do is watch, warn and wait for the next move and hope our sons and daughter or their children are not sent to war as the cannon fodder for a set of fresh chess moves to benefit our nations elite but the reasons laced with lies and false patriotism.

Bob the winner is the ending to the Military machine...There is no way the clash of armies is going to procure a winner.....the outcome is total annihilation....no winner.   

Interesting concept to say the least Babel, thanks for an interesting read. Course a World government led by the UN would be more like Checkers than Chess intellectually speaking.