NP Rank:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Signaled New US-Asia Relation
Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton signaled the new U.S. approaches toward Asia, and in particular, China, in her first major foreign policy speech delivered at the Asia Society in New York, on Feb.13.
NP Readers are welcome to view a full length video of Secretary Clinton's speech and read the full text provided by the State Department here:
"In the Obama Administration, we are also ready to reach beyond ministerial buildings and official meeting halls, as important as those are. We’re ready to engage civil society to strengthen the foundations needed to support good governance, free elections, and a free press, wider educational opportunities, stronger health-care systems, religious tolerance, and human rights.
And we are ready to listen. Actively listening to our partners isn’t just a way of demonstrating respect. It can also be a source of ideas to fuel our common efforts. Too often in the recent past, our government has acted reflexively before considering available facts and evidence, or hearing the perspectives of others. But President Obama and I are committed to a foreign policy that is neither impulsive nor ideological, one that values what others have to say. And when we have differences, which we will, we will discuss them frankly and specify those which limit our capacity to cooperate."
It has been several decades since a United States Secretary of State looks toward and travels to Asia. Traditionally, previous Secretaries of State have gone to Europe to herald their first overseas trips. Mrs. Clinton will begin her four-nation tour over the weekend, which included China, Indonesia, Japan, and South Korea.
Mrs. Clinton drew a clear line of differences between the Bush administration and the Obama administration by recognizing Asia's influences in the world civilization and highlighted the special long-standing relationship between Asia and the United States. America is home to 13+ million Asian Americans whose contributions to the nation and around the world are immeasurable.
"As I’ve said before, America cannot solve the problems of the world alone, and the world cannot solve them without America.
At the same time, given the realities of today’s world, we can no longer approach our foreign policy solely country by country, or simply by carving the world into separate regions. With smart power, we will seek to build partnerships that transcend geographic and political boundaries.
In the months ahead, I will press for stronger bilateral, regional, and global cooperation when I meet with leaders of Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa, just as I will seek more robust engagement in my discussions with Asian leaders in Tokyo, Jakarta, Seoul, and Beijing next week."
Secretary Clinton emphasized United States' continual interests in fostering partnership with Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, and Australia, to name a few.
Mrs. Clinton commended Japan for assuming a leadership role in Asia by working collaboratively with others to address economic problems, explore space, and offer relief to victims of global disasters. She also asserted that South Korea is one of the U.S. most historically staunch allies.
"...everyone who has followed the history of South Korea joins me in admiration for the transition that we have observed from static conditions of the past century to the dynamic state that South Korea finds itself in today. The United States and South Korea are both committed to expanding trade in a manner that benefits both of our countries, and we will work together to that end."
The rest of Secretary Clinton's speech was devoted to the US - China relationship as she discussed a partnership role instead of an economic rival, which was the Bush's approach.
"It is vital to peace and prosperity, not only in the Asia-Pacific region, but worldwide. Our mutual economic engagement with China was evident during the economic growth of the past two decades. It is even clearer now in economic hard times and in the array – excuse me – in the array of global challenges we face, from nuclear security to climate change to pandemic disease and so much else.
"Some believe that China on the rise is by definition an adversary," Mrs. Clinton said at the Asia Society, "To the contrary, we believe the United States and China benefit from, and contribute to, each other’s successes. China has already asserted itself in positive ways as chair of the Six-Party Talks and in its participation in international peacekeeping efforts .”
She added that the U.S. would resume mid-level military-to-military discussions with China. The talks were suspended by Beijing in 2008, after U.S. arms sales to Taiwan.
"It is in our interest to work harder to build on areas of common concern and shared opportunities. Even with our differences, the United States will remain committed to pursuing a positive relationship with China, one that is essential to America's peace, progress and prosperity."
Mrs. Clinton also expressed several U.S. concerns that would need China's active cooperation namely, the Tibetans' right to practice their religion without fear, a thorny issue with China, and climate change. To that end, she plans to visit a US - China joint venture energy-efficient power plant in Beijing.
In her closing remarks, before taking questions from the audience, Mrs. Clinton recalled an ancient Chinese story of warring feudal states.
"An ancient Chinese story tells of warring feudal states, whose soldiers find themselves on a boat together crossing a wide river in a storm. Instead of fighting one another, they work together and survive. Now, from this story comes a Chinese aphorism that says, “When you are in a common boat, you need to cross the river peacefully together.” The wisdom of that aphorism must continue to guide us today.
So I will leave for Asia Sunday with a firm commitment to work very hard with our partners across the Pacific, to strengthen our engagement so that the positive transformations of the past half-century are replicated, mirrored, made stronger and more obvious in this century.
We have such an opportunity that I hope we will seize, but it is not just up to our government to do so. It is also up to Americans across our country, those of you here in the Asia Society, in the private sector, in academia, in labor and the professions, in nongovernmental organizations all.
Let us commit ourselves to providing the kind of outreach and responsiveness, understanding, and commitment that will lead not just to a better understanding, but positive actions to improve the lives of our own people here and those who live in Asia today."
Crowd Power
-
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (73)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
mazevedo
Vancouver, Canada -
harringtola
Town-send, Massachusetts, United States -
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada
-
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
danesller0127
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (12)
at 10:08 on February 14th, 2009
Perhaps this is cynical of me, but I wonder if she went to Asia first because she felt it was the best move politically or because she wanted to draw that clear distinction between the Obama and Bush administrations? Perhaps a little of both...
at 14:10 on February 14th, 2009
Thanks so much Amy for your observations and recommendation.
It's only political in global diplomacy, but certainly not, in terms Clinton's jockeying for attention in the Obama administration. When you parse her speech, you'll notice that she follows President Obama's overall foreign policy direction. In the past, Mrs. Clinton has differed with Mr. Obama on several levels, but not in this speech as the Secretary of State.
The trip to Asia is an important signal to Asia, particularly, China that the US is willing and open to mend some tattered fences, so to speak, from the previous administration's hard stance on some issues. China is a global economic force and no country, including the US can afford to ignore China or leave the visit to that region sometime later during the Obama administration, considered the prickly relationship between the US and China over the years.
China won't hesitate to wield its economic clout to influence and shape political events around the world. People in the West can spew all kinds of talks, but if they'd stop and listen to a plethora of leaders in EU, North America, Africa, and elsewhere, their tones toward China are quite diplomatic and conciliatory.
at 10:12 on February 14th, 2009
I like the way she has taken a familiar Chinese story and related it to the global situation. I like the moral of the story specifically, "When you are in a common boat, you need to cross the river peacefully together.”
I hope everyone who hears is open to listening.
at 12:54 on February 14th, 2009
Thank you so much harringtola for your observation and recommendation. I also hope everyone including Europe and other regions listen, in light of the global economic slow-down. These nations are sovereign countries with their own national interests, just as the United States has its national interests, therefore it's important to conduct foreign policy with a nuanced touch.
at 10:53 on February 14th, 2009
I don't see anything about the Bush administration that indicated that we didn't listen to China. We have listened too much, if you ask me.
We "listen" and they use the death penalty for corruption, are on a campaign to wipe out Tibetan culture, are responsible for 25% of the mercury in the waters of the Northwest, manipulate their currency, steal the rest of the world's intellectual property, and censor the Internet.
And, yes, they helped solve the problem, or, at least, diminish the problem, of North Korea's atomic weapons program.
This is window dressing, this speech, and, as I just indicated, I don't want "listening" to China. I want China to exchange their dollars for rimimbis and then start buying from us as well.
China's manipulation of currency, combined with our idiotic North American Free Trade Act, is what is responsible for rendering non-competitive the Maquilladora region on the Mexican side of the border with the US.
at 06:05 on February 15th, 2009
I agree that the Bush administration listened to China quite well and used China to deal with North Korea as they were already busy with Afganistan, Iraq, and Iran. I would cite this as one of the few things Bush did right durring his terms in office. The Clinton administration dealt well with China as well, and now the Obama administration is set to do likewise.
Do we need an idological war between the USA and China, would that make you satisfied. I am sure we could find many problems with most nations you can think of, but that does not mean that they should be sanctioned instead of "listened" to.
Actually China is exchanging its dollars for US Bonds, issued in Trillions of dollars these days. If not for China, the US government would be the largest sub-prime loan in history and would have to declare bankruptcy. We should all be thankful that George Soros hasn't decided to sink the US economy as he did Southeast Asia in 1997.
If the Chinese government is the devil, America's soul has been bought and paid for many times over. The Obama administration is in no position to posture, nor will any administration be in position to for a very, very long time.
It is a good thing that America cannot get involved with China's internal affairs, it is really not their role. It is the role of the United Nations and NGOs like Amnesty International, not US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
at 10:57 on February 14th, 2009
Thank you roy c for your comments and recommendation.
at 17:10 on February 15th, 2009
To little to late for the US no matter who is running the Show. And Japan is really getting tiered of the US accusations of protectionism because Japan does not buy Ford and GM products yet does buy plenty of Made in Germany, Made in France and Made in China. Maybe should stop complaining and start facing the reality that their products are far out dated and no one want them any longer, for they are to expensive, to out dated and to much trouble.
at 12:50 on February 16th, 2009
Thank you paschen for your recommendation and comments.
My piece is about the Secretary of State outlining the United States foreign policy goals of President Obama. Lucky for America, Japanese leadership is not hostile toward America as your sentiments seem to indicate perhaps, based a slight misread of my piece, since there isn't any mention of Japan's protectionism in the piece.
I believe I wrote that Secretary of State had commended Japan:
Mrs. Clinton commended Japan for assuming a leadership role in Asia by working collaboratively with others to address economic problems, explore space, and offer relief to victims of global disasters.
at 22:50 on February 16th, 2009
If you like to believe so, however I did also read other statements She and other officials have made to that regard. You report only the rosy side of it all not the whole picture as is.
We are at time blinded by our enthusiasm, are we not all?
at 09:16 on February 16th, 2009
Thanks very much! Pythiian! for the news... It's sound good to me... as an Asian, I'm happy for that! :D
at 17:21 on February 17th, 2009
Thank you danesller0127 for your recommendation and comment.