NP Rank:
Senate passes gay hate-crimes bill
A bill to make violence against gays and lesbians a federal crime cleared the Senate Thursday and is headed to the White House for final approval.
The 68-29 vote was a victory for civil rights groups that have been fighting for years to expand the federal hate-crimes law beyond attacks motivated by bias based on religion, race, national origin or color
I am totally against violence
against gay people but I do
not think criminals should be
punished for why they did something
but should be punished for what they
did. A murdered gay man is just as
dead whether killed by an anti gay bigot
or by another gay man.
Crowd Power
-
DeanZacharias
United States
Recommendations (32)
-
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Mritunjay
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India -
albertacowpoke
Canada
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
jjenet
Ilford, Essex, United Kingdom -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (13)
at 17:14 on October 22nd, 2009
We have a hate crime bill in Canada, which is all inclusive.
at 17:27 on October 22nd, 2009
I understand the idea behind this but I still think all violence should be equal.
I just do not agree with a hate crime law for anyone.
at 18:15 on October 22nd, 2009
A hate crime doesn.t necessarily include violence. A hate crime could be by inciting hate against a certain group or person. It has to be defined within its limits. As an example you could be encouraging people to pick up arms and go after a certain ethnic group.
It is normally very hard to get a guilty conviction on it. It has to be a specific act.
at 20:40 on October 22nd, 2009
This could debase freedom of speech.
If taken to the logical completion it could end most political debate.
at 09:46 on October 23rd, 2009
I think all violence should be equal. Really, How about crimes committed against children as opposed to adults? Same penalty, no exceptions?
at 18:52 on October 22nd, 2009
ACP, encouraging violence is already a crime here.
Frankly, I don't see the need for hate crimes legislation, either. Assault and incitement are crimes, whether I do them because you are different than me politically or sexually or racially.
It makes the assault of a gay man more important than someone assaulting me. What reason could there be for that?
at 19:45 on October 22nd, 2009
Canadian Hate Crime Legislation is broad in its applications and is not just to protect one group. It applies to anyone.
I see your point about the U.S legislation passed today as it is group specific. Assault is assault regardless who it is directed against.
Without seeing the text of the legislation I can't comment on it. In my comments above I was merely pointing out what the Canadian law is. It has been used against people promulgating hate against jews and advocating that the holocaust didnt happen. I.m not a lawyer so I can.t tell you what the specific criteria is to prove that a crime is a hate crime.
at 20:47 on October 22nd, 2009
That was exactly what I was saying.
Assaulting me should require the same penalty assaulting a black, gay, Jewish, hispanic woman.
at 07:14 on October 23rd, 2009
True. He wanted the money.
at 09:46 on October 23rd, 2009
Only with a highly expanded definition of hate can you maintain your position.
Lying with no intent to harm anyone can be useful at times.
at 11:09 on October 23rd, 2009
Back off, Rob.
Hatred is not "denying the truth". To deny the truth, you have to know it first. Most areas of life are gray areas, not black and white.
So, how do you know you know the truth?
What is it that that character says in a French novel? "I don't know why it is but I am the only person I know who is always right!"
Hatred is an emotion, a feeling, the opposite of love and you can "love" out of a denial of the truth as well.
at 12:10 on October 23rd, 2009
Roy C
I agree with you
at 12:16 on October 23rd, 2009
Please keep the comments on topic and not personal on this thread; it's detrimental to the discussion.