NP Rank:
Senate Votes For Safer Products
The Senate yesterday approved the most far-reaching changes to the nation's product safety system in a generation, responding to recalls of millions of lead-laced toys that rattled consumers last year.
Lawmakers still have to resolve key differences between the Senate bill and a similar measure that passed the House in December. While the Senate version is considered by consumer advocates to be tougher, both contain provisions that would require retailers and manufacturers to be more vigilant about product safety.
The biggest change is likely to be a better-staffed Consumer Product Safety Commission, with more enforcement power. Both bills would boost funding for the agency, which had a budget of $63 million in fiscal 2007 and just less than 400 employees, fewer than half the number it had in 1980. The Senate bill, which passed by a vote of 79 to 13, would increase the budget to $106 million by 2011. The House's version would increase it to $100 million.
Both bills would provide funds to upgrade the CPSC's antiquated testing facilities. Both bills also would raise the maximum amount of money the CPSC can fine companies that fail to report product hazards immediately. Fines are now capped at $1.8 million. The House bill would raise the cap to $10 million; the Senate to $20 million.
The Senate and House measures would also effectively ban lead in all children's products, not just toys, and require toys to be tested by independent labs.
"I'm glad something is going to change. I just hope future families don't have to go through what we had to go through," said Andrew Hartung of Manalapan, N.J., whose 14-month-old daughter, Abigail, was injured last fall in a Bassettbaby crib that was later recalled.
The bill's sponsor, Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), said, "The vote is a victory for the health and safety of children."



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 02:09 on March 7th, 2008
Dave Keating, I like this story. It's good stuff. Now if only the Chemical Safety Board could get such an increase in thier meager $10 million dollar budget.
During calendar year 2007, the agency received notification of 937 chemical incidents from sources including the National Response Center, media reports, and other federal agencies. Thirty-one out of the 937 reported incidents were serious or even fatal events that were considered “deployable” – or likely warranting the commitment of CSB investigators if available. However, due to personnel and resource limitations, the CSB was able to send investigators to a total of just eight sites.4
Suppose you had 23 airline crashes and investigators couldn't be sent out to investigate to find to cause? Would that be kosher? This is the story that needs to be written about. I see a Pulitzer Prize Award Winner here in investigative journalism in getting to the root of this.