NP Rank:
Senator won't deny CIA program was "Cheney Assassination Ring"
Gosh, it's hard to believe Dick Cheney would run an assassination ring through the CIA and not tell Congress, as required by law. Dick Cheney loves America, right? H-h-he wouldn't break the law, would he?
This past March, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell when he told an audience at the University of Minnesota that the Bush Administration was running an “executive assassination ring” which reported directly to former Vice President Dick Cheney.
“It’s an executive assassination ring essentially, and it’s been going on and on and on,” Hersh stated. “Under President Bush’s authority, they’ve been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving. That’s been going on, in the name of all of us.”
After correspondent Contessa Brewer summed up the “Cheney assassination ring” backstory, MSNBC anchor Dylan Ratigan asked Rep. Anna Eshoo, (D-Calif.), “Can you comment at all on Contessa’s report about a possible private army reporting to Dick Cheney being the thing about which you and others were misled?”
“No, I can’t,” Eshoo responded, “it’s highly classified and I can’t discuss it.” Eshoo held firm, and wouldn’t divulge details about the program. She did, however, drop some clues.
“Some of my colleagues have, in many ways, pooh-poohed it and said it wasn’t this and it wasn’t that. I believe that’s a complete mischaracterization of what director Leon Panetta informed the committee.”
“Now, I give him credit for coming up to the Hill the day after he was informed about this program. I also think it’s quite curious that his own people didn’t brief him when he first became director after he was confirmed.”
“But what I can tell you is that people were instructed not to inform the Congress. Now, that’s in direct violation of the law. The National Security Act… When the committee was informed by Director Panetta, everyone was stunned across the board, Republicans and Democrats. As well as we should be in terms of having something absolutely concealed from all members of Congress. The top leadership of the Congress didn’t know. So this is serious.”
Crowd Power
-
TheCameraObscura
Los Angeles, California, United States -
sara star
Halifax, NS, Canada
Recommendations (32)
-
tikun
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
politisite
Columbia, South Carolina, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 15:00 on July 11th, 2009
Seymour Hersh has done some good work exposing inappropriate actions in Military operations. The problem is that his reporting is biased toward facts that only look at the US faults and leave out both sides of a story. His allegations that Cheney had a secret assassination ring is nothing more then an attempt to demonize Cheney. The CIA has had operations going on that targeted high value targets. It sounds good to make Cheney into some demon. Read any ex-cia book and this type of stuff has been going on since WWII.
Good story and good read... so you get my 10 recommendation points. I recommend anyone read, "Charlie Wilsons War" to see that even democrats were heavy into proxy wars and assassinations.
at 10:22 on July 12th, 2009
I appreciate the recommendation points, but I need to address a few of your statements.
Seymour Hersh is not bias against the US, he has reported on atrocities committed by foreign governments as well. When he does report about US atrocities (My Lai massacre, torture at Prison Abu Ghraib, torture at Guantanamo Bay), there is often a knee jerk reaction by those who reject his Pulitzer Prize winning reporting.
No one needs to demonize Dick Cheney, he demonizes himself with justification of torture at Gitmo, invasion of Iraq, lying ("insurgency is in its last throes" 2005) and fearmongering ("we will get hit by terrorists if John Kerry is elected" 2004). If Cheney ordered no assassinations, then why not talk about it?
at 00:03 on July 12th, 2009
Well said Politisite. That just about summons it up for me. Hersh has been notorious in the past for writing about any number of issues that turned out to be bogus. He tends to be extremely biased and often mean spirited. But nevertheless, if this one turns out to be true then let the law of the land deal with it.
Thanks for the article.
at 10:11 on July 12th, 2009
Seymour Hersh won the Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the My Lai massacre, during the Vietnam war, which was called "bogus" by Republicans.
He was also one of the first to report on the torture at Prison Abu several years ago, again, Republicans called it "bogus" until the pictures proved hersh correct.
He also reported on the torture at Guantanamo Bay, again, called "bogus" by the right wing.
at 07:54 on July 13th, 2009
Bogus on how many other issues he reported but were forgotten. I am all for his revealing political and military actions not sanctioned by law.
at 08:04 on July 13th, 2009
The CIA has been taking people out since JFK. And guess who was in charge of the CIA in Dallas on THAT day!! GHW Bush.
at 12:46 on July 13th, 2009
In all fairness all spy agencies "take out" people when they deem appropriate. It is part of the reality in our world. "good or bad".