is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
The results of two experiments supported the hypothesis that, for sexist men, exposure to sexist humor can promote the behavioral release of prejudice against women. Experiment 1 demonstrated that hostile sexism predicted the amount of money participants were willing to donate to a women's organization after reading sexist jokes but not after reading nonhumorous sexist statements or neutral jokes. Experiment 2 showed that hostile sexism predicted the amount of money participants cut from the budget of a women's organization relative to four other student organizations upon exposure to sexist comedy skits but not neutral comedy skits. A perceived local norm of approval of funding cuts for the women's organization mediated the relationship between hostile sexism and discrimination against the women's organization.
This may well fall into studies conducted by the University of the Bleeding Obvious but I thought it might be important nonetheless. It seems that sexist humour may make sexist behaviour more acceptable (subconsciously or otherwise) to men who are predisposed to such behaviour. And this could well have been what many of us feminists have been saying for years. Sexist jokes, which are not funny anyway, do nothing to help women.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 05:51 on March 28th, 2009
Perhaps it is not the sexist jokes, but the immaturity of those who repeat it.
at 05:52 on March 28th, 2009
I think it's a combination of both - the values expressed in the sexist joke and the values (immature or not) of those repeating it.
Thanks for the recommendation and comment, Barry.
at 06:06 on March 28th, 2009
A joke is a joke, it is when the joker believes what they are saying to be true but just say it in jest, that's when it is no longer funny.
at 06:07 on March 28th, 2009
I think that's the implication of the research, yes.