NP Rank:
Smoke and Mirrors: The Role of the TEA Party in American Politics
A desire for smaller government, abolishing taxes, getting government out of U.S. citizen’s lives and a seething, palpable loathing for President Obama, his administration and what they believe are the policies of the Obama administration, are unifying themes among all those affiliated with and identified as supporters of the TEA Party. TEA Party = Taxed Enough Already Party.
Usually, when times get tough in the U.S., the phrase ‘the good old days’ can be heard, uttered with longing, having been dusted off and interjected into society’s discourse, with ‘tough times’ and ‘good old days’ being relative to the speaker, understood by those listeners of like mind.
Folks begin to seek a comfort zone, attempting to re-create, to the best of their abilities and recollections, a time and circumstances when they believe they understood their lives, things made sense to them and when they felt they had the most control.
An assortment of variables but, at the forefront, financial instability, coupled with worries for the future, brought on by financial instability and many times, merely a generalized, undefined fear of the future, motivates segments of society to revise and re-write history to reflect a desired journey back to a newly sanitized past.
By design, the TEA Party is recognized to be loosely aligned local and state units, with its membership and supporters proudly proclaiming its independence, to their way of thinking, due to its lack of traditional organizational structure and functioning.
Forensic political dissection of the origins of the TEA Party has proven links between the TEA Party, the insurance industry and the Republican Party, a bothersome pedigree that is still denied by many within the TEA Party.
• The TEA Party Movement Examined
After gathering momentum during its opposition to health care reform legislation, during the summer of 2009, which, despite orchestrated opposition to the reform, was successfully passed in the spring of 2010, the TEA Party has struggled to find its political stride.
According to a number of polls that have attempted to identify the TEA Party, it is comprised of those identified as Democrats, Independents and Republicans, although most individual supporters or members of the TEA Party identify strongly with the Republican Party.
• Poll: Older, White, Male Republicans = The Tea Party
• GOP Concerns for Extremist Fringe Party Takeover
Republican politicians have courted and aligned themselves with TEA Party elements. Republicans like Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Michelle Bachmann, Sharron Angle, Tom Tancredo, to name a few, are adopting the talking points and issues of the TEA Party.
• TEA Party Convention Opening Speaker Tom Tancredo Laments Lack of Literacy Test
• The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Ended the Use of Literacy Tests
Also within its ranks is the Right Wing, including members of the Militia movement, those desirous of secession from the United States and White nationalists/supremacists. The number one hate site on the internet, Stormfront, determining their affinity with the TEA Party, has actively encouraged their ranks to join the TEA Party movement. Neo Nazis have proclaimed the TEA Party the White revolution that they’ve been waiting for. (sic)
• Opinion: Tea Partiers: White Nationalism on the Move
Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, the Council for Conservative Citizens (CCC), founded by the reconstituted former leadership of the Whites only Citizens’ Councils established in the southern United States in the 50s and 60s, known by many as the ‘white collar Klan’, proudly proclaims its influence within the TEA Party.
• Council of Conservative Citizens' Influence in U.S. Politics and the Religious Right
Those enamored of the TEA Party view it as a viable, developing third party choice to the Democratic and Republican Parties. Although, they may succeed in exerting influence in races and on some issues, due to its origins, the lack of organizational cohesion and its troubling inability to distance itself from racist and fringe elements that are attracted to it, the TEA Party, regardless of its desire to be otherwise, functions as the extreme Right Wing auxiliary arm of the Republican Party, the party most TEA Partiers and supporters say is the party with which they share most ideological identity.
Crowd Power
-
ari
San Francisco, California, United States -
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
TheCameraObscura
Los Angeles, California, United States -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
DarrienW
United States -
qbubbles
Fairfax, Virginia, United States -
cconyersjr
Nyack, New York, United States
Recommendations (29)

Anonymous users (3)
-
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (30)
at 12:34 on July 15th, 2010
United We Stand, Divided We Fall. Thats all this piece is about, division. Their has been absolutely NO evidence to back any assertions of so called racist being within the Tea Party. Just a bunch of maybe and could be's in conjunction with peoples words taken out of context to get an intended outcome by the writer.
Try reading about the NAACP engaging in the same political tactic by them calling the Tea Party a "Threat To "Democracy, Human Rights,Civil Rights" while they call a black man who was beat and stomped by union thugs, because he was a Tea Party Supporter, a "Uncle Tom." You tell me which one is a greater threat to Democracy, Human Rights and Civil Rights; The Tea Party who supports freedom and being all inclusive open to all people regardless of color, or the Ones who support division, name calling and beatings?
at 12:44 on July 15th, 2010
The United States has always been divided, in some form or fashion, by race, class, religion, to name a few easily recognizable distinctions.
At this point in history, in many ways, not since the Civil War has the country been more divided.
JustMyOpinion, if you find the time to read all of the links included in the article, nothing I have written should be dismissed out of hand.
at 05:24 on July 16th, 2010
Perhaps, we're all just more aware.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Alekx (not verified)at 18:02 on July 15th, 2010
This is an absolutely appalling assertion to make of the TEA Party movement. It merely underscores the lack of understand of the message and the people who are delivering. Instead of spreading insidious comments, you should understand that "a government large enough to give you anything is large enough to take everything." I don't know how you sleep at night knowing that you are not only generalizing a group of patriotic and proud Americans, but also slandering and implicating them in some vast conpiracy to shift the nation towards anarchy. Shame.
at 18:17 on July 15th, 2010
Alekx (not verified), due to the lack of structure of those aligning themselves with the TEA Party, as well as those elements that make up its most extreme components, it is imperative some decision for structural cohesion, to weed out and halt non-productive momentum, be exerted to assure the Tea Party is not plunged into total anarchy.
at 19:53 on August 10th, 2010
Sadly, the majority of those "patriotic and proud Americans" do their country a myriad of disservices. The first being a general lack of intellect and understanding of well the economic, political, and social principles of the nation. The second being, a general lack thereof of desire to change the status of said lack of awareness and intellect. The third being, an overall lack of decorum and respect for what America actually represents-- equality, opportunity, open-mindedness, and freedoms. The fourth being rabble rousing as opposed to civil and productive discourse. Frankly, there are too many. I could go on, but what's the point.
Also, when you deem yourself a party you call for generalizations. That is typically the entire point of forming one. So that the common member will be as knowledgable as the theoretical principles of candidates and nominees etc as the most informed. There is no other basis for benefit from a party system.
at 15:56 on August 11th, 2010
Very well said, Grace.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anymoose (not verified)at 18:03 on July 15th, 2010
omitting one use of racism while defining another is racist. all racism is negative social expression and one can not be supported. racism needs to be seen as one thing equally ugly and cheap expression no matter what ethnicity use it. you people need to get together and support each other on issue one before you can even meet on the political.
at 18:19 on July 15th, 2010
Anymoose (not verified), this article is not about racism.
It is about an evolutionary split in the Republican Party that seems to have begun attracting Right Wing extremists of all types, such as secessionists who represent a segment of society that desires to dismantle the country.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anymoose (not verified)at 18:46 on July 15th, 2010
trouble is such "secessionists" as you call them also in black community. republicans not sole owner. and not all republican or white. for every white there is a black acting same way. please excuse simplicity of term. time to stop white black talk and start american talk honestly . as far as i can see many democrats not even honest enough to look beyond populism of obama and critically view government as it really is operating aka bush. but ever thing ok because obama is whitehouse? doesn't make sense to everyone. even when republicans no threat. beating dead horse just makes more enemies and sure enough people will change vote looking for promised change. will not be republican fault but democrat. does this make sense to you? republicans can offer change to. tea party is looking for change promised by obama. a few hijack media coverage and media look for that and only print that. if liberal media can make ridicule tea party then no change necessary. wall street owns whitehouse again not honest citizen no matter what politics.
at 20:39 on July 15th, 2010
And I state again, the article is not about racism or race.
It is about the fracturing of the Republican Party, with its offshoot, the TEA Party, attracting elements that need to be reined in if those desirous of the TEA Party's influence to develop into a force with longevity is to be achieved.
However, as has been noted, racial attitudes, good or bad, factor in nearly all aspects of U.S. life, including the TEA Party.
From a study conducted by the University of Washington:
Source: uwnews.washington.edu
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anymoose (not verified)at 21:14 on July 15th, 2010
than you need to see highlighted portions of post. white this white that commentary. also realize tea party not republican organ. most people by definition from both left center right center. like i said earlier focus on bad acting minority reported in press and miss the point altogether. like focusing on panther party and call all blacks racist?? many black people in tea party also in republican party also in democrat. Christopher Parker, a assistant professor Department of Political Science at the University of Washington is southern black man who has very color bias and write about black vs. white supremacy. to use him to support argument is like republican quoting dick cheney. might as well quote nation of islam since they run new black panther party to back up thinking on this.
at 21:19 on July 16th, 2010
This article isn't about people being racist and acting badly.
This article draws the connections between various organizations and movements that, for the most part, the TEA Party pretends are not within their midst, influencing and, in some instances, possibly co-opting, their planned action.
The influence of the Council of Conservative Citizens within the TEA Party, who declares at its website the belief that America is a European country and that it's people are part of the European people, as well as a general intolerance for everything and everyone non White, is a troublesome reality.
The ugliness that pops up within the TEA Party, with the Party seeking to be a legitimate political force, has within its midst elements promoting racial bias and White supremacy.
Source: thinkprogress.org
If, as stated by anyone seeking to defend the TEA Party, saying they are truly intolerant of racism, those arriving to their events with a game plan and attitudes contrary to what those supporters and members of the TEA Party allege to believe should not feel welcome to be a part of the movement.
It appears the TEA Party chooses not to disavow those elements, specifically on a one on one, case by case basis, often trying to deflect addressing racialist exhibitions within the TEA Party, only addressing and halfheartedly denouncing racial displays in generalized, umbrella terms, for whatever reasons.
It is obvious that those elements do not feel unwelcome among the TEA Party.
at 18:35 on July 15th, 2010
When reactionary and extremely conservatives of any political denomination are almost on the loser's side of the fence,haunted by fear of slipping ground from under their feet come together on a single platform to defeat progressive measures and policies of the government.That happens in every country where reactionary elements have suffered defeats after defeats.
Tea party movement,if at all it is movemnt,consists of lunatic elements of the Democrats and the Grand Old Jokers Party.In my opinion Tea Party is Fused Bulbs Party.
at 19:51 on July 15th, 2010
T k kidwai, I would characterize some of the elements attracted to the TEA Party indeed exhibiting the behaviors of someone backed into a corner.
What makes these developments more dangerous is the articulated remedy for the alleged expressed frustration being voiced, for instance, by Tea Party favorite Nevada Republican Sharron Angle, that being that some solution involving 2nd Amendment rights, the right to bear arms, is indicated as a possible solution.
Trying to back pedal away from her statement does not put the sh*t back in the horse.
at 00:54 on July 16th, 2010
@ Karen,
I would also describe much of what Sharpton has done in his life as "Racist" in nature. His baiting others and calling people racist if he does not agree with them is is the lowest form of communication. I know very little of the tea party folks except what I read in the news. One thing is clear it has grass roots active support by disaffected Americans pissed off at the changes Obama is making in his legislation in congress.
According to a new piece by Charles Krauthammer, "The net effect of 18 months of Obamaism will be to undo much of Reaganism. Both presidencies were highly ideological, grandly ambitious and often underappreciated by their own side." A fascinating read I strongly suggest the effort.
Krauthammer article
at 06:02 on July 16th, 2010
The quote from Mr. Krauthammer would seem to be correct in his comparison of Presidents Reagan and Obama, as they are diametrically opposite in ideologies.
at 17:09 on October 10th, 2010
I sometimes see Obama as the Reagan of the Left.
at 08:41 on July 16th, 2010
Republican Representative from Minnesota, Michele Bachmann:
Source: tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Ross Wolf (not verified)at 17:46 on August 10th, 2010
Americans Talk Revolution, State Secession, Anything To Get Away From Obama Government.Americans’ anger builds daily against Obama and his Czar appointed Government intent on forcing down the throats of Americans a hybrid form of Marxist/Socialism. America already has reached pre-revolution level. Unless Obama’s relentless attacks on the Constitution and Freedom of Americans are abated, it is foreseeable something might happen to set off millions of Patriot Americans. Obama’s leftist supporters should read history to get a historical perspective how fast a population (Americans) might unite to come together against a perceived enemy. If Obama wasn’t concerned about Americans revolting, his administration would not be relentless to pass laws and regulations to cripple bloggers and other alternative media communicating real news that Citizens, grass-roots organizations and others depend on to make informed decisions. Obama and his Neomarxists intend to drown out, shut up the Voice of Patriot Americans. Obama’s support of the DISCLOSE Act confirmed what many Americans believed; that Obama intends to strangle the flow of information and replace it with his leftist propaganda. When communists have attempted or taken over a country, their first step was to control the media and all forms of public communications to control Civilian populations. The Obama administration is using its government power to censor, shut up its critics. Marxist governments have made communism work by murdering civilian populations considered not critical until populations are reduced to a level an unproductive communist government can support; and by cannibalizing assets communists stole from arrested and killed Citizens. Obama supporters state, they want to destroy capitalism, free enterprise: that would delete millions of U.S. jobs, creating millions of non-critical Americans a RED U.S. Government would not want to support. In other countries where members of a political party or ideological extremists attempted or succeeded in forced censorship, took over the means of production, Citizens have revolted, jailing despots for treason. Obama Top CZAR Cass Sunstein prepared in 2008 a paper that proposed spying on Americans, infiltrating groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government. See:www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884Perhaps Obama intends to jail lawful Patriots. Obama gave a speech in May 2010 asking Congress to pass legislation to give the President power, to detain any person in the U.S. that government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future. President Obama wants the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do. Hear Obama’s own words at: www.brasschecktv.com/page/630.htmlLast week Obama proposed that the FBI have the power to obtain without warrants, Citizens’ “electronic communication transactional records” including email addresses they used to send communications. If the FBI’s request for warrant-less Internet surveillance is granted, Americans to avoid federal conspiracy charges and or being set up by provocateur emails, may have to report to police (every email) they receive that might allude to anything illegal. Private information the FBI derives from warrant-less searches of emails and Internet Activity—could potentially be used by a corrupt Obama Government to blackmail, target anyone though government harassment, prosecution or civil asset forfeiture because someone dared disagree with the government. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax, phone call or web activity out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or confiscation of someone’s property.Alarmingly the Obama Government recently employed a vendor to search Internet social networking sites to collect information about Americans that could potentially be used by this government to injure Americans, for example, if you apply for a federal job, your name might be crossed referenced by the Obama Government with comments you made at Websites against Obama; or if you make application at a bank for a loan the Government has control since the financial crisis, could your Internet comment(s) prevent you getting that loan? Obama’s monitoring of the Internet sites can too easily be used by Government to intimidate, coerce Americans from speaking out.If FBI warrant-less Internet Spying is approved, it is problematic the FBI will share its spying with law enforcement, government contractors and private individuals that have security clearances to facilitate the arrest and forfeiture of Americans’ property—-to keep part of the bounty. There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture. Under federal civil asset forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property.
at 18:58 on August 10th, 2010
One person's act of perceived patriotism is another's act of treason, Ross Wolf (not verified).
A duly elected administration wielding power with the aid of duly elected representation, elected and selected by the people of the United States is not a despotic regime, no matter how often the demented among us may state otherwise.
As Public Enemy used to say 'Don't Believe the Hype!' .
at 02:46 on August 15th, 2010
For conclusive response to people who claim Obama government to be despotic:
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/militias-and-despotism-who-fooling-whom
A regime that is actually despotic would not tolerate people who make such claims, and these people would all be dead or in labor camps. That they are not, proves that the Obama government is not despotic or totalitarian or Communist, and people who think that it is are obviously full of crap.
at 11:20 on August 17th, 2010
Ishambat, those who make those claims also offer nearly conclusive proof of their ignorance on the subject when such claims are made.
at 01:52 on October 8th, 2010
Yes, but that ignorance is not apparent to people unless it is shown to be ignorance in their own language. That is why it is important to tell people in language that they know just how much these people are ignorant or lying. Here are some articles to that effect
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/right-wing-tyrants-and-american-values
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/threat-totalitarianism-america
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/republicans-and-unofficial-totalitarianism
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/tea-partys-math-and-clinton-policies
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/what-republican-candidates-are-really-saying
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/christian-right-true-totalitarians-america
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/republican-lies-how-do-they-get-away-it
at 19:24 on October 10th, 2010
I hope you are correct, Ishambat but, it has been my experience that the condition of selective ignorance, with ignorance defined as the state of being ignorant, as in lacking knowledge, is a condition that stubbornly defies gaining knowledge, with those you've addressed being capable of only hearing or understanding within the framework, limited scope and embodiment OF their lack of knowledge.
If the condition is selective, as I fear in many cases it is, theirs is a choice that has been made to their detriment.
Thanks for the links to these articles.
at 05:53 on October 11th, 2010
So basically, they don't know because they don't want to know, and they only hear what they want to hear.
I have years of experience dealing with people of that sort on the Internet, and one thing I've learned to do through all this is to get people in their own paradigms and show them how they are absurd. Use their own beliefs and statements against them. Take their own thinking and stand it on its head. Don't try to argue with them from the left; argue with them according to their own precepts. It can be mentally challenging, but when it works it works very well.
at 00:41 on October 8th, 2010
Here is the way to deal with arguments such as this person's: If Obama administration had in fact been despotic or Communist, then he and his buddies would all be dead or in labor camps. That they are instead free to spread their propaganda, using government-built Internet of all places, shows that the Obama government is neither despotic nor Communist. Whereas his ideological soulmates advocate expressly despotic and totalitarian tactics, such as murder and imprisonment of people for their political convictions.
The TEA party types are the true totalitarians of America. That they claim themselves to be true Americans, and the rest of America to not be true Americans, shows that their intent is nothing less than imposing themselves upon the totality of America and to subjugate everyone who is not them.
The claims of Obama administration as being despotic is a red herring. It is the people who believe such things that are the true totalitarians of America.
at 19:31 on October 10th, 2010
An on point summary of this bizarre, through the looking glass rationale offered by the extreme Right Wing and many adherents/supporters of the extreme Right Wing of the Republican Party, the TEA Party, Ishambat.
at 05:57 on October 11th, 2010
An added argument is that people who want to do something bad like to accuse their opposition of trying to do the same thing. Hitler for example claimed that Jews wanted to do to the Germans what he wanted to do to the Jews. So if these people are accusing Obama of wanting to impose totalitarianism, what it reflects is that they are trying to do just that.
at 06:05 on October 11th, 2010
Thats a bit of a broad statement, isn't it? Just because Hitler said it does not make it a universal truth.