is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Santa Claus may soon be the only figure in Canada to impose any hold over children's behaviour. Senate has now passed the anti-spanking bill (S-209) and is looking for the approval of the House before it can be installed as a law.
Bill S-209, which needs House approval to be made into law, proposes to eliminate Section 43 of Canada's Criminal Code, which allows parents, teachers and caregivers to use reasonable force to discipline a child and correct their behaviour.
Liberal Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette first introduced the bill in December 2004, shortly after the Supreme Court denied a challenge to Section 43 and upheld the right of adults to physically discipline children between the ages of two and 12.
Dion's support expected
Hervieux-Payette said she believes she will get the support of Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion in the House, although the ruling Conservatives have voiced concern over the bill. Hervieux-Payette said if the House does not pass her legislation, she will simply keep reintroducing it.
"It is to send a signal, so that people who use violence in a repeated way will no longer feel protected," she said, according to Canwest News Service. "It is not to arrest everyone who gives their child a tap on the arm."
The Senate mulled over the bill for more than three years, as the Canadian Bar Association and the Canadian Council of Criminal Defence Lawyers spoke out against it. In response to concerns, the bill was amended to allow parents and caregivers to use force in very specific situations — such as when a caregiver wants to immediately stop a child who is about to do something dangerous that could cause serious harm.
Routine discipline and using spanking as premeditated punishment wouldn't be allowed.
"No corporal punishment would be allowed, either by an educator, the mother, the father or someone acting for them," Hervieux-Payette said.
A Canadian court has lifted a 12-year-old girl's grounding, overturning her father's punishment for disobeying his orders to stay off the Internet, his lawyer said Wednesday.
The girl had taken her father to Quebec Superior Court after he refused to allow her to go on a school trip for chatting on websites he tried to block, and then posting "inappropriate" pictures of herself online using a friend's computer.
The father's lawyer Kim Beaudoin said the disciplinary measures were for the girl's "own protection" and is appealing the ruling.
pumpernickel
Austin, Texas, United States
D. Hooper
Canada
Jer_GlobeTrotter
Canada
Zedzuada
Canada
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 04:47 on June 21st, 2008
I think this bill is a super idea and I hope it passes. I'm sick to death of parents who hit their children. It's horrible to witness, and is proven to lead to more aggressive behavior in the long run. Also, spanked children are more likely to grow into drug abusers, alcoholics, and criminals. Research shows this, over and over. Violence begets violence. It's incredible how much ignorance exists, still, on this subject. So many adults must be eager to hit little buttocks, they make up the most ridiculous, twisted excuses for it, never based on any facts, just some "anecdotes" that always sound made up.
I have some advice for spankers: stop hitting. Use your head instead. Try communicating with children, who you are supposed to love and not assault. And stop claiming hitting creates well-behaved children. Although they may behave better at first out of fear, in the long term they will behave worse. Even mild spanking has been shown to create worse behavior in the long run. Funny, when they finally made wife beating illegal, they didn't need all this research. It was just seen as a human right to not be hit by others. It's better for people to learn good communication skills, than hit their family members. Stop the violence. Pass the bill and join the other 24 countries that have banned hitting children.
at 11:13 on June 4th, 2009
One question? How much research have you done on this subject? Sounds like you could be speaking from past experience. Not that I disagree with you. But where did you get your facts, would be interested in reading them myself. Thanks