Sri Lanka: attacks on free media put displaced civilians at risk

by B12N | September 1, 2009 at 01:51 am
165 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

Vigil marking the first anniversary of the detention of Sri Lankan journalist Jayaprakash Sittampalam Tissainayagam, London, March 2008

© Amnesty International

"If you read Sri Lankan newspapers, you still get the government version. Very rarely, you get a critical point of view," said Sunanda Deshapriya.


Attacks on journalists, relentless intimidation, and government-imposed restrictions on reporting threaten freedom of expression in Sri Lanka and jeopardize the safety and dignity of civilians displaced by war.

The Sri Lankan government actively obstructed reporting on the last stages of the recently concluded armed conflict with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE – Tamil Tigers). Civilians were subjected to artillery attacks and both sides were accused of committing war crimes.

The government continues to deny journalists and media workers unrestricted access to hundreds and thousands of displaced people living in camps, hindering reporting on their war experiences and on conditions in the camps themselves.


At the same time, unprecedented levels of violence against media workers engaged in critical reporting has contributed to a climate of fear and self-censorship that has deprived the people of Sri Lanka of their right to information.


Sri Lankan press freedom advocates say that more than 30 people working for Sri Lankan media outlets have been killed since 2004.

Read more...

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Nugawela





Despite the fact that last week an Iraqi judicial committee determined that he should be set free and granted him amnesty, and press freedom groups continue to call for his release, today Associated Press photojournalist Bilal Hussein started his third year in U.S. military detention in Baghdad.

With the bulk of the U.S. military's accusations against the photographer either dismissed or debunked by independent investigators, the military says it reserves the option to "ignore" the amnesty ruling and to keep Hussein in detention as long as they think he's a threat.

When the military turned the photographer's case over to an Iraqi judge and the Iraqi judicial system in December 2007, they said it was up to the Iraqi judicial system to determine Hussein's fate. Now that the Iraqis have done that, and the outcome was other than what the U.S. military hoped for, their decision to continue to hold Hussein while they "review" the amnesty order flies in the face of their own previous words.

Despite press freedom groups and Iraqi judges sayiing Hussein, 36, should be released immediately, the Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer is still in prison in Camp Cropper, a U.S. detention facility near Baghdad's airport.

The military seized and detained Hussein in Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province, two years ago today. They have held him without charging him with any crime under the suspicion that he had worked with Iraqi insurgents.

Another story to work on for B12N. Living in a Western country, he should be ablr to tackle this too. By the way, USA is doing it.

0
B12N

Are you going to say. Hitler killed millions of jews so Sri Lanka can kill tamils. Don't search excuses to justify your own faliure!

0
israeli.agent

Nopes, all needed to say is terrorists killed people, so Sri Lanka killed  terrorists.

Terrorists are not tamils.

Sri Lankan failure is in their inability to kill 'all' terrorists because terrorists run with their tail firmly between their rear legs whenever confronted. Being 'tigers' indeed helped performing such an act.


.Agent.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

senthil5000
First Flagged at 5:45 PM, Sep 2, 2009 by senthil5000

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from