Sri Lanka Tigers rebels deny firing at civilians

by Sanjay Jha | February 11, 2009 at 01:57 am
201 views | 1 Recommendation | 6 comments

Photos

Sri Lanka promises it will not endanger civilians

Sri Lanka promises it will not endanger civilians

see larger image

uploaded by Sri Lanka Army news

The Tamil Tigers on Wednesday denied gunning down civilians streaming out of Sri Lanka's war zone, and the Red Cross said 16 patients had been killed in shelling.

On Tuesday, the military accused the LTTE of killing 19 civilians and wounding 69 more trying to flee. Sri Lanka's government, aid agencies and rights groups say the LTTE has forced Tamils to stay in the war zone, which the rebels deny.

Pro-rebel web site www.TamilNet.com said on Wednesday the rebels blamed Sri Lankan troops for the shooting. The web site quoted C. Ilamparithy, whom it identified as LTTE political chief for the area in question, Puthukudiyiruppu.


Categorically denying reports by the Sri Lankan military officials in Colombo that the Tigers had fired at the fleeing civilians in Vanni, Puthukkudiyiruppu Divisional Political Head of the LTTE, C. Ilamparithy told TamilNet Wednesday that Sri Lanka Army (SLA) commando teams had entered the 'safety zone' in Udaiyaarkaddu and Chuthanthirapuram and had opened fire killing civilians and causing injuries to many in their attempt to forcibly move the civilians into the hands of the SLA. "Sri Lankan military machinery, which has relentlessly killed and maimed thousands of civilians during the past four weeks, is now engaged in a propaganda drive to divert the mounting pressure on the Colombo government by the International Community," Mr. Ilamparithy charged.
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
Tiana

Been desperately wanting a civilian who escaped Vanni to tell the real story.... Well, a distant female relative has confirmed. The SLA took 30 females away with them. Do you wonder why?!!? Rape???!!! Murder!!!???  Why did the war start in the first place??? Just confirms, route cause of the problem will NEVER be sorted. If things carry on the way they do, the end of ltte means the rise of another force, hopefully a non-violent one this time! So f*c*k*** fed up with people defending their monstrous army! 

0
Isuru Thilakaratne

Hey Tiana, I just want to know more about this incident... when and where were the 30 females taken away from? Do they know why they were taken away and has anyone tried to stop the SLA from doing so? finally, has anyone seen or heard from these females since? This is in no way against your statement, neither am I playing it down. If it truly was the SLA, and if these 30 females were escorted away for any other reason than for the women's own good, it definitely needs to be investigated.

1
Tiana

Escape one hell hole and enter another! Welsome to the world of sri lankan tamils...

3
Tiana

Also I must say, I don't believe anything that comes out of either forces' mouths, because at the moment, it's a game of who wins the most sympathy/who gets the most blame on an international level. I must say, I was under the impression that a lot of Tamils supported ltte because of fear of expressing any support for any other movements. However, having watched a Tamil TV channel, I was shocked at the response to one man questioning whether ltte could have carried out these murders. Three others jumped down his throat because they were so offended. Is it so wrong to question something? To doubt ltte? Has nobody else been affected negatively by the ltte? Like I mentioned before, a family member was shot dead in broad daylight leaving my hubby a fatherless boy at 12, by the ltte who later apologised that it was a mistaken identity. The dead cannot be brought back to life by a simple apology. Has no Tamil on this website been affected by the ltte? Because I'm very surprised at the reaction you get if you say something negative about the ltte. People agree with the root cause of why the ltte was formed in the first place (we know all about that, not going into it deep), but are many people blind to many sufferings ltte has caused? I know that  Tamils will never forget the sufferings under the hands of  government forces and can understand the hatred they have for them. But also consider the sufferings ltte has caused. Many people may deny it ever happened, but shooting innocent Sinhalese civilians in a bus one by one, is that the act of heroes? I know it's the older leaders who are to blame. The younger ones are brainwashed and do what the leaders tell them to. I would blame the leaders for the atrocities, the younger ones are made to believe that they are purely fighting for their people. Because, my cousin who died as an ltte was certainly not an evil girl. She was in the days that I knew her, a really sweet and innocent girl, she was brainwashed. She always said that she was fighting for the people. Numerous opportunies to get her out of ltte failed. I know she never would have harmed innocent civilians, just the sla. You've got the bad who are willing to carry out atrocities and you've got the not so bad who would only fight their enemies. I guess many tamils have relatives who died or belong to the ltte and won't hear anything bad said about them. A distinction must be made between the evil and the good. But its important to understand that evil in the form of leaders takes control and causes sufferings. I could say the same about sla. But please respect each others' opinions instead of biting back.

1
Isuru Thilakaratne

Fully agreed...

for your information, I just recommended your post... just trying to show you I'm not a total bastard.

I know where you're coming from. I have friends who are in a similar situation as you. His grandfather was shot by the SLA during a curfew... but his uncle was shot by the LTTE because they thought he was an informant of the SLA, when he wasn't. Now, he doesn't support either. It is evident that crimes have been committed by the SLA in the past. I truly believe that one of the differences now is that they have been taught how important it is to 'behave' as a soldier, eliminating or at least reducing by a large degree how the Sinhalese soldiers treat the Tamils. This post of yours (given that your relative's account is true) puts this into question, which is actually a little disappointing for me.

In the past, the soldiers that did commit crimes... such as killing innocent civilians, raping innocent women could have done what they did for the hatred they had for Tamils/for revenge as well as just pure 'horniness'... and never ever is there a single excuse for it: a crime is a crime. Like I said though, that was a long time ago, and since then, your new post is the first time that I have heard where something like this has happened in the hands of the SLA (and again, given that its true).

I'm eagerly waiting for some news from you about the 30 women that were taken away.

1
Tiana

Thanks for being a little understanding unlike certain other individuals. Nah you're not so bad ;) She had said that 30 females were taken away and that was it. She doesn't know what happened to them, but it certainly puts a doubt in your mind why 30 females were selectively taken away. If she knew any of them, I guess there is a chance of the truth being out considering any of them make it alive. I'm waiting to hear a few more home truths from my cousin's brother in law who suffered injuries, however, he will be taken to camp after the treatment so don't know if there will be any chance of freedom of speech. Will update you on that if I hear anything.

I apologise for my previous comment to you.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 6:40 AM, Apr 14, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (1)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from