NP Rank:
Study confirms FOX News makes you stupid
http://www.readersupportednews.org/off-site-news-section/68-68/4280-study-confirms-that-fox-news-makes-you-stupid
Yet another study has been released that proves that watching Fox News is detrimental to your intelligence. World Public Opinion, a project managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, conducted a survey of American voters that shows that Fox News viewers are significantly more misinformed than consumers of news from other sources. What’s more, the study shows that greater exposure to Fox News increases misinformation.
So the more you watch, the less you know. Or to be precise, the more you think you know that is actually false. This study corroborates a previous PIPA study that focused on the Iraq war with similar results. And there was an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll that demonstrated the break with reality on the part of Fox viewers with regard to health care. The body of evidence that Fox News is nothing but a propaganda machine dedicated to lies is growing by the day.
In eight of the nine questions below, Fox News placed first in the percentage of those who were misinformed (they placed second in the question on TARP). That’s a pretty high batting average for journalistic fraud. Here is a list of what Fox News viewers believe that just aint so:
- 91% believe that the stimulus legislation lost jobs.
- 72% believe that the health reform law will increase the deficit.
- 72% believe that the economy is getting worse.
- 60% believe that climate change is not occurring.
- 49% believe that income taxes have gone up.
- 63% believe that the stimulus legislation did not include any tax cuts.
- 56% believe that Obama initiated the GM/Chrysler bailout.
- 38% believe that most Republicans opposed TARP.
- 63% believe that Obama was not born in the US (or that it is unclear).
The conclusion is inescapable. Fox News is deliberately misinforming their viewers and they are doing it for a reason. Every issue above is one in which the Republican Party had a vested interest. They benefited from the ignorance that Fox News helped to proliferate. The results were apparent in the election last month as voters based their decisions on demonstrably false information fed to them by Fox News.
By the way, the rest of the media was not blameless. CNN and the broadcast network news operations fared only slightly better in many cases. Even MSNBC, which had the best record of accurately informing viewers, has a ways to go before they can brag about it.
The conclusions in this study need to be disseminated as broadly as possible. Fox’s competitors need to report these results and produce ad campaigns featuring them. Newspapers and magazines need to publish the study across the country. This is big news and it is critical that the nation be advised that a major news enterprise is poisoning their minds.
This is not an isolated review of Fox’s performance. It has been corroborated time and time again. The fact that Fox News is so blatantly dishonest, and the effects of that dishonesty have become ingrained in an electorate that has been been purposefully deceived, needs to be made known to every American. Our democracy cannot function if voters are making choices based on lies. We have the evidence that Fox is tilting the scales and we must now make certain that they do not get away with it.

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 04:43 on December 16th, 2010
I am not sure, why it is a major problem in Epping, Australia, but be it. its a mystery, but from a mystery man its appropriate. FOX news is a TV channel and in US everybody has right to have a TV channel, if one wants to. In Slovakia, we have conservative magazines and a small internet TV channel and its o.k., beccause we are a free country. often times I disagree with those conservative magazines or TV channel, because they are much more biased, than Fox news. They say, that for example everybody who opposed the Iraq war is wrong {Kissinger, Baker, Albright, etc..) our conservatives also say, that Stalins regime was worse than Nazi regime, and that Russia is terrible and that Russians have "impossible" mentality. I disagree with these statements, at least partially, but yet I think that these platforms have right to exist, beacuse they are in a democratic framework. Its like Volatires statement : I disagree with you, but I support your right to speak up.. And that is the story of Fox news, we can disagree with it, but since somebody has resources to run this station and it runs professionally, there is not much we can do.
at 05:04 on December 16th, 2010
of course - I meant Voltaires statement....
at 16:47 on December 16th, 2010
Matt, I am not advocating that Fox News be shut down. The article shows that Fox News consistently misinforms the public, as obviously do the conservative papers in Slovakia. One thing that is prized by people of principle in any country is truthfulness of what is communicated, and when what is being communicated is a pack of lies then one has the right to say so.
at 11:04 on December 17th, 2010
Garbage in garbage out -- that goes for viewers and broadcasters.
at 17:11 on December 16th, 2010
Whats the Aussie take on Mr. Murdoch's 'Fox News' mates ? How do you blokes feel about Mr. Murdoch making a quid?
Fox News is definitely commerically driven. It's concern for 'truth' is an abstract. Who's truth and what the public believes. It does well by statistics and revenue flow. What knowledgeable and intelligent people may object to mostly is, Fox News focus on satisfying viewer perception and commerical realities, rather than actual idealism. Capitalist news media at it's finest..lol Right or wrong ?
at 17:33 on December 16th, 2010
Judging by the actual study [which in of itself is questionable] and not ishambats revision. Many Democrats who would never watch Fox political commentary [which is separate entity from the actual news reportage] hold the same opinions, and hold equally misinformed opinions related to Republican interests. We in all honesty can not lay all this partisanship and misinformation on the doorstep of FoxNews. ishambat has proven time and again that he is quite willing to stretch the truth to suit his bias and isn't known for his objective commentary.
at 01:49 on December 17th, 2010
As if there is such a thing as objective commentary.
One thing I can tell you for certain. You'll find much less truth-stretching, and much more insightful analysis, on my board here than you'll find at Fox News.
at 05:31 on December 17th, 2010
One thing I can tell you for certain. You ain't any different than FoxNews. Flip-side side of the same coin. Insightful analysis, OMG. Did you type that with a straight face?
at 05:55 on December 17th, 2010
What Fox news dislikes about president Obama {they would do the same with Bill Clinton} is not the fact that he was a muslim, or that he has dark complexion or his African ancestry or that he was always with rich and succesful people. They dislike his truly cosmopolitan viewpoint and maybe also a way of life. This is as we say here a thorn in their eyes. They appeal to cowboy, midwest rifle owners mentality. here in Slovakia their is still {after 20 years of non communist rule} a distaste or dislike for petit bourgois people or class, for example disliking of succesful actors in politics. I think it stupid and shortsighted. as a political scientist I would be interested if this viewpoint and prejudice grows stronger or weaker in years to come. we shall see..
at 11:10 on December 17th, 2010
Fox isn't really a "news" channel anymore than MSNBC is a "news" channel or Comedy Central.
When I was a child, I watched the Huntley Brinkley New Hour and these guys were serious about their news and the journalism profession. Their competitor was Walter Cronkite, surely a top form journalist.
Many of the people we watch are former sportscasters and athletes who have a gift for popular gab. Sarah Palin fits in well with these people.
I don't buy it.
at 12:18 on December 17th, 2010
The debate about truth in the media, print, t.v., and blogworld, is interesting and worthwhile. I read/watch all of them and take them all with " a grain of salt". Since about 1980 truth has taken a back seat to perception. Objectivity is not valued by those who control access to the many media stages/microphones. We are no longer willing to receive the facts and let the chips fall where they may. Those who are in control of the many bully pullpits must win, at any cost. I'm just glad I was exposed to Huntley and Brinkley and Cronkite back in the day. It helps me find "my truth" which at least considers "the facts".