Sulfuric Acid: The True Face of Islam

by ishambat | July 28, 2012 at 02:57 am
404 views | 5 Recommendations | 7 comments

Photos

Sulfuric Acid: The True Face of Islam

Sulfuric Acid: The True Face of Islam

see larger image

uploaded by ishambat

Attached is the photograph of a woman whose husband threw sulfuric acid on her face - before and after.

The picture says more than I can in words, and I am an experienced writer. Here is a beautiful woman who was completely disfigured, and who as a result of the attack was put into constant horrible pain. She finally took her life this year. The degenerate who did this to her has not been prosecuted.

And she is far from the only one.

The people who do these kinds of things are the same people who claim that the West does not have morals. I have news for them: The West's morals are far better than theirs. Western men do not throw sulfuric acid on women, and those who do face an extended punishment. Instead the West protects people's rights against those who would do such things. This makes the West vastly morally superior to Middle East. And it is time that more people say so outright.

There are people who rally around patriotism, and there are people who rally around Christianity. But not enough people rally around the West's true superiority to Middle East. This means the social covenants that protect free speech, women's rights and other great cultural and social accomplishments that took place in the West starting in 18th century. And it is by rallying around this - the West's true moral superiority - that the West can do the right thing by its achievements and drive out a threat to these great social accomplishments.

It is these accomplishments that are the true greatness of Western countries. The West does not have people throwing sulfuric acid into their wives' faces and getting away with it.  The West does not have 90% of women living in conditions of daily brutality and degradation.  The West does not force teenage girls to marry old men.  The West does not have men demonstrating against anti-rape laws with signs "We want to rape." In the West, women have rights and liberties. And while there are many in the West who are against these social accomplishments, it is in these social accomplishments that is found the moral superiority of Western countries to Islam.

The Middle East used to house the world's greatest civilizations. But now it is among the worst places in the world. Africa is improving; India is improving; Latin America is improving; East Asia is vastly improving. But Middle East - with exception of a few forward-looking countries such as UAE and Qatar - is continuing its slide into stupidity and brutality.

While there was recently a military operation to depose Muammar Qaddafi, he was the least of Middle East's problems. Lybia under Qaddafi was the wealthiest country in Africa, and it was a country in which many people had rights who didn't have rights elsewhere in the region. The real problem with Middle East is and has always been Islamic fundamentalism. And this is as much the case for countries that elect fundamentalists as it the case for countries in which the Islamists run operations without people's approval.

Nobody less than Thomas Jefferson stated that independence is a privilege of a mature mind. The people who throw sulfuric acid into their wives' faces do not deserve freedom or independence, and the countries that tolerate such behavior do not deserve self-governance. When these places then state that they have ethics and that the rest of the world doesn't, what we see is an outrage and an absurdity. These people have the worst ethics of anyone to be found. A gangster, a thief or a drug dealer has better ethics than do they.

I do not say, as do the relativists, that Muslim ethics do not apply outside Middle East. I say that Muslim ethics are wrong absolutely. I say that Islam is evil. And I say that the Middle East would be able to recover its greatness if it were to do away with Islam as such.

Is that a realistic goal? Maybe yes, maybe no; but I can tell you what is realistic. It is prosecuting men who do such things as throwing sulfuric acid into women's faces. It is making this kind of behavior criminal and enforcing laws against it. And on the part of the West, it is demanding that governments in Middle East prosecute such barbarism and making sure that they do.

As markets for exports of Middle Eastern oil and places where they keep their banking accounts, the West has economic and political pull to demand such a thing. No country deserves to sell anything to Western countries until it stamps out this kind of monstrosity. No country deserves recognition as a country until it stamps out this kind of monstrosity. And no country deserves self-government until it eradicates this evil.

To people who constantly mistake kindness for weakness, only power greater than theirs is a language that they accept. The Islamofascists exploit Western liberal thinking to excuse unjustifiable barbarities and abuses, then they laugh all the way to the mosque and think that they are strong and that the Westerners are all weaklings. Things of such nature cannot be dealt with in a nice way. They must be forcibly eradicated. Only meeting the Islamists at their bestial level will bring about the changes that need to take place in the Middle East.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
"thirty-aught-six"

No book can be evil. Not even a book that wholly advocates evil for the sake of evil. The evil lies with in the reader and their willingness to prescribe to such interpretations that excuse evil. As usual your articles are narrowly focused bigotry that attacks a very small minority as if it was representative of the norm. There is a 'universal norm' of approximately five to seven percent of a given population at any one time who behave criminally. Denigrating a complete society as absent of moral and ethical values is beyond the pale of decent, reasoned commentary.

0
ishambat

"No book can be evil."

Try Mein Kampf.

"The evil lies with in the reader and their willingness to prescribe to such interpretations that excuse evil."

What you are doing here is excusing the people who advocate for evil and give all the responsibility to the followers. A conman would be very happy with being absolved of responsibility for his wrongdoing in such a manner. But it is bad for everybody else.

"As usual your articles are narrowly focused bigotry that attacks a very small minority as if it was representative of the norm."

If it is not representative of the norm, then the other people who don't do such things need to take action and stop the people who do.

0
"thirty-aught-six"

Thank you for your reply. A few small corrections are needed though. First, as I said above, no book is evil. Some passages of Mein Kampf illustrated the evil that resided with in an individual. Mein Kampf didn't create Hitler or make him the man he became.

Like wise with the Quran. Sure it holds some "old testament" parable and ideas of social justice but, that in itself does not create the society. It reflects only in part the socio-political history. For every passage you may deem evil there is a passage that offers an alternative. People choose. Those who would use a vulgar interpretation of any work to perpetuate their ill-treatment of others would USE anything they could grasp as justification. Again it is not the book, rather the individual.

"What you are doing here is excusing the people who advocate for evil and give all the responsibility to the followers." I do not excuse those who advocate for evil. I hold them responsible for their actions. I certainly don't allow them the excuse that a book made them do it, as you do. And yes, I do place the responsibility on the followers of evil for accepting that path. That responsibility is theirs and theirs alone. For with out their acceptance of the "ideas" no power over them would exist.

What power does the conman hold? None. Until someone accepts the con by their own reasoning. Generally, believing it gives them some advantage. Purveyors of junk find a market in those thinking they will get something for nothing.

The idea of individual freedoms is built on the foundation of individual responsibility. Let those who speak evil, speak evil. In the free market of ideas/ideology, any evil will gain acceptance or be refuted according to the will of the populace. In regards to religious text vs. religious practice that is as true in Baghdad as it is in Baltimore or Brisbane or Bethlehem. It's no fault of Judaism or Christianity or Islam. The fault lies with the individual. Anyone who follows along the path of evil.

"If it is not representative of the norm, then the other people who don't do such things need to take action and stop the people who do." It is not a matter of if -it does not represent the norm. Not any more than liberalism or conservatism taken to the extreme is a norm. The social norm seeks a balance between extremes. Muslim nations are at a comparative disadvantage in finding that balance because Islam encompasses religious/political/social/ judicial ideology. In that regard Islam has a monopoly in the market place of ideas and that can impinge negatively on social norms. Not all Muslim societies are the same in expression and many today are rejecting extremist attitudes.

BUT. [Big but]. Any expectation that Islamic nations will reflect the extreme views of social progressive liberalism is not the fault of Islam nor Muslims. Responsibility for such a thought resides wholly on those who believe everyone ought to be like them and that their thinking is the only right thinking. Another example of extremism. One, as I pointed out above you harbor, declaring your moral superiority, and by demeaning an entire people as immoral for the cause of a few extremist. What you fail to understand is that such thinking is the baseline for even more "liberal" Islamic State's to reject social compromise and to defend what they want to change about their own governing. Their own willingness to prosecute the extremist element.

In your spiel about the moral superiority of Western society you conveniently leave out the tragedy of the years upon years of religious and social upheaval, the wars, the sacrifice of millions, the darkest periods of our social development to arrive at the idea of the rights and freedoms of the individual. Not as rights bestowed on a public by government, rather they are inalienable rights granted from birth by God which are to be protected by government.

0
matt stefanovich

I see your words and sentences as a result of hot head and angry mind, Ilia... no other explanation !  you throw around words like evil islam, islamofascists, etc.. I am not used to words like that in your texts...   sorry- but you sound like Bush jr.  Bush and hos war and agression oriented policy brought americans to coffins in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, etc...   only way is coexistence. sometimes maybe fight, like there should be one in Mali, Africa, where Al kaida is taking over, but Middle east is not so bad. and by the way think of Auroras shooting. this is a crime against one woman. There it was crime against unknown bystanders. what is worse ?

0
ishambat

Well yes, I am angry that this has happened.

The total number of women to whom this happens in Middle East is far greater than the number of people who died in the movie theater shooting. And the men who do this are not in the middle of a psychotic break.

As I said to "thirty-six," if this is not typical behavior in Middle East then the people who don't do that need to pass and enforce laws against the people who do. Otherwise they get tainted by association.

0
sam_micheal

when i look at that picture above, i cringe in my heart for the woman, her cruel husband, the society that created him, the people who make excuses for him.. we argue here about who is to blame or who should be punished.. we're all responsible for a tragedy like this.. we're all to blame; we all need to ask for forgiveness.. why all of us? because that man who did this is my brother and his wife - my sister.. if we're all not part of the human family, what are we? disconnected aliens? ..so my brother Jesus asks us to forgive him and my brother Siddhartha asks us to find a way to stop the cycle.. my mother asks for balance in all things.. and she also tells me: all good things take time .. in my way of viewing things, probably in his next life, he'll be a plastic surgeon who works on restoring faces of people.. he'll come across a case where a woman was burned intentionally.. and he'll wonder what kind of monster could do such a thing.. we live in a just universe; his karma will 'get him' rest assured.. there is no need for punishment.. he will have to live with the memory - into his next lives.. if he continues on this path, likely he'll be reborn a cockroach running around a hospital.. there his only food will be pieces of skin and charred flesh from burn victims.. as you can see, i don't believe in Hell.. but.. as i describe his rebirth, do we really need one? does this view not make more sense than heaven/hell? and if the core characteristic of God is forgiveness, should we not have infinite chances to make amends?

0
ishambat

While we are on this subject: The man who wrote "Amazing Grace" used to be a slave ship owner. He became a priest and raised an English nobleman who then went on and ended slavery in England and English colonies. 

The idea of karma raises all sorts of issues, including ones such as, "Did everyone who died in World War II have the karma for it? Did everyone who took part in peace and prosperity of 1990s have the karma for it? And why would we see more people with bad karma in 1940s than we do now?"

I do not believe that karma is at work here. What is at work is hideousness in a person that is abetted and in many ways encouraged by fundamentalist Islam. These kinds of things must be dealt with in our lifetime, otherwise a whole bunch of people - good karma or bad karma or no karma - would be born in some horrible fascist order and would wonder why they are alive and what they have done in their past lives to deserve their predicament.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

tikun
First Flagged at 3:05 AM, Jul 28, 2012 by tikun
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (5)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from