Supreme Court Denies Further Obama Eligibility Hearings

by Doc Vega | June 13, 2012 at 11:21 am
589 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Supreme Court Denies Further Obama Eligibility Hearings

Supreme Court Denies Further Obama Eligibility Hearings

see larger image

uploaded by Doc Vega

The blind eye to justice that has been practiced by the Supreme Court since President Obama took office has gotten even worse with this latest legal heresy in the Obama eligibility scandal.

The Supreme Court refused without comment to hear an appeal over the legal citizenship of Barack Hussein Obama. As a result the court declared that Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake, and Markham Robinson could not appeal a previous ruling which denied them the standing to challenge the President’s citizen status. You might remember that Alan Keyes ran against Obama in Illinois.

Although the Supreme Court is the only authority that can rule on Constitutional issues, and establish legality based upon that premise, it is the Congress and only the Congress that can decide whether or not a presidential candidate is lawful or ineligible. To date, there has already been a petition given to Congress calling upon them to carry out their duties under the US Constitution and decide that Barack Hussein Obama is actually ineligible to serve as president of the United States of America. It is the Congress that is given the ultimate authority of determining the eligibility of any presidential candidate from any party.

That Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake, and Markham Robinson were denied standing does not mean that the court acknowledged that President Obama is fit to hold office under the interpretation of the natural born citizen clause. But, it does deny the parties who sued Obama from having the right to claim harm as a result of Obama being elected. This also does not establish that Obama is indeed eligible under the US Constitution, it merely states that the individuals trying to bring the law suit before the Supreme Court could not show that they had suffered any harm as a result of Obama’s inauguration as president of the US. However it does not challenge the validity of his right to hold the oval office.

What the Supreme Court fails to address is that each and every American has been harmed by the unconstitutional conduct of President Obama and the fact that he has falsified federal documents in order to conceal that fact. The US government is now operating illegally in plain site of the Congress and public and yet our court system fails to prosecute and uphold the Constitution. This is what is happening to America under the lawlessness of the Obama administration.

Let us be clear on the question of standing, the term used by the Supreme Court to refuse hearing a case. Standing is a procedural ruling that without deciding guilt or criminal cause, is a refusal by the court to schedule a trial. This can be a prejudicial judgment by the court by deciding who they allow the right of due process of law to. In denying standing to Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake, and Markham Robinson, the Supreme Court was refusing to perform its duty in upholding the Constitution while denying the claimants the right to remedy their allegations. This is an intentional dereliction of duty to the point of criminal negligence on part of the Supreme Court Justices who handed down their decision to deny standing. This is the unbelievable road block to justice that has been erected by our court system.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Paul Smith

I could not agree more. SO WHAT THE HELL ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?!?

0
Doc Vega

Paul, I think that the window for conventional options is closing quick when our Dept. of Justice and court system refuse to honor the rule of law. The government has morphed into a huge lawless entity! Contact your senator and congressman and ask what the hell is going on. Option 1.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from