NP Rank:
Supreme Court, Pakistan: Sharif Brothers can contest elections
Supreme Court of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on Tuesday lifted a ban on Sharif Brothers which means that now they are eligible to contest elections and hold office. Sharif Brothers, Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif, were previously disqualified by the Lahore High Court to contest elections, a move that sparked mass protests in the country and resulted in huge changes in the country's political scenario including the reinstatement of Chief Justice of Pakistan.
Supreme Court of Pakistan on Tuesday lifted a ban on opposition leader and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif holding office and contesting elections, his lawyer said.‘The judgement is that the order... disqualifying Shahbaz Sharif and Nawaz Sharif has been set aside,’ said Ashtar Ausaf, a lawyer for the brothers.
The Supreme Court verdict was given by a five-member bench headed by Justice Tassadaq Hussain Jilani.
The Supreme Court said the Lahore High Court (LHC) decision in the case of Sharif brothers was inconsistent, adding that Nawaz Sharif's 1999 presidential pardon requires deeper inquiry to determine whether the pardon was conditional.
A February 25 decision of the LHC to disqualify Sharif and his brother Shahbaz — chief minister of Punjab province — from contesting elections and holding office sparked mass protests in March.
The government appealed against the ban and agreed to reinstate Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, bowing to a key demand from Sharif, leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-N party.
‘The previous verdict was not accepted by people. Today's verdict has been accepted by the majority of the nation,’ Sharif told a press conference.
‘States and countries prosper on the basis of justice and fair play. We want the rule of law and I salute the Pakistani nation as they secured the independence of the judiciary through their own struggle.’
Noisy supporters gathered outside the Islamabad courtroom, carrying posters of Sharif, who has become Pakistan's most popular politician as President Asif Ali Zardari's approval rating plummets.
Zardari's Pakistan People's Party won elections in February last year months after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, but his popularity declined.
The government's March 16 promise to put Iftikhar Chaudhry back in office saw Sharif call off a mass protest march on the capital and raised hopes of ending the debilitating political crisis in the country.
The Supreme Court had on March 31 suspended the ban on Shahbaz Sharif, but that decision had to clear a final legal hurdle on Tuesday.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Nauman Umair Khan
Pakistan
Recommendations (19)

Anonymous user
-
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
amyjudd
Vancouver, Canada -
israeli.agent
India -
Hiranya Malwatta
Moratuwa, Western, Sri Lanka -
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (9)
at 11:17 on May 26th, 2009
So,what is the political fallout from this decision? More freedom for Pakistani people or less?
at 11:48 on May 26th, 2009
Don't know, Rene. I basically hate politics, just reported because people all over the country lauded this decision...
:)
One thing I do know is that freedom isn't bound to leaders or political scenarios, it comes from within. Example? You guys! And your United States of America! You guys enjoy freedom because you know what freedom is, you guys recognize the fact that how your ancestors fought for it, why they fought for it... Sadly, it's not the case here, in Pakistan half of the population is almost incognizant of freedom... People working under feudalistic lords don't even know whose ruling the country right know... You guys are helping us a lot, I personally thank you... But, your country should hold my country's leadership accountable for all those funds... plus they should be utilised in a positive manner... How's that?
at 12:29 on May 26th, 2009
It's hard to understand what freedom means if you have never experienced it. Most people think that democracy is the answer, not so. Our country has a solid base in our constitution, and is legally a Constitutional Republic. with rights of minorities guaranteed by the Constitution and the amendments including the Bill of Rights. wiki on Constitution.
Although there are mentions of God and reliance on God, the emphasis is on 'Freedom of religion' and separation of religions from the state. In other words, religion will not determine or rule the state.
at 12:47 on May 26th, 2009
Agree!
at 12:44 on May 26th, 2009
From a "feel good" chain mail.
When asked if they know what love is, a three year old girl replied like this.
"Love is a girl and boy leaning on and smelling each other, smiling all the time”
I think only freedom can make innocent kids give such an answer.
.Agent.
at 12:54 on May 26th, 2009
:)
at 23:40 on May 26th, 2009
I want freedom from religion, lol
The problem everywhere its a global one and that is that voters only have two options and that is to vote for the lesser corrupt contestant. our freedom is always limited to the freedom our elite leaders allow. That's the reality and I include a country that termed it self the land of the free at a time when the original inhabitants lost their freedom and those that declared lived in a land that had slaves.
The freedom of US citizens is being whittled away by its elite.
Be careful what you wish for.
at 04:46 on May 27th, 2009
"Be careful what you wish for. "
For , you may get it..!
.Agent.
at 06:12 on May 27th, 2009
:)