Supreme Court, States can demand photo ID before Voting

by Albert Milliron | April 28, 2008 at 01:51 pm
982 views | 26 Recommendations | 7 comments

Photos

Supreme Court, States can demand photo ID before Voting

Supreme Court, States can demand photo ID before Voting

see larger image

uploaded by Albert Milliron

Supreme Court: States can demand photo ID before Voting

Todays Supreme Court Decision has been a polarizing issue between Republicans, who believe that a photo identification is a basic document used in most financial transactions in America today,  will ultimatly reduce voter fraud, and Democrats, who believe that the poor and old members of the electorate will not be able to vote  thus disenfranchising voters who are typically Democrat.

Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reed and Spreaker Pelosi came out in opposition to the High Courts decision.

"The Court's decision today places obstacles to the fundamental rights of American citizens - especially the poor, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities - to participate in the electoral process," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said. "Requiring American citizens pay for underlying documents needed for an identification card and travel to distant motor vehicle locations for processing hinders - and diminishes - their right to vote."

Hillary Clinton is against this decision as well. She has introduced the Count Every Vote Act which allows for same-day registration and allows voters who don't have ID to vote.  She says that requiring ID is oppressive

Read the Descison here

The Lead Opinion writen by Justice Stevens,  The Dissenting Opinion written by Justice Breyer

Writing the court's lead opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens said the risk of voter fraud is ``real'' and that fraud ``could affect the outcome of a close election.'' States, he said, have a ``valid interest in protecting the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.''

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer dissented. Writing for himself and Ginsburg, Souter said the law ``imposes an unreasonable and irrelevant burden on voters who are poor and old.''

Here is what the Associated Press is Reporting

WASHINGTON (AP) - States can require voters to produce photo identification, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, upholding a Republican-inspired law that Democrats say will keep some poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots.

Twenty-five states require some form of ID, and the court's 6-3 decision rejecting a challenge to Indiana's strict voter ID law could encourage others to adopt their own measures. Oklahoma legislators said the decision should help them get a version approved.

The ruling means the ID requirement will be in effect for next week's presidential primary in Indiana, where a significant number of new voters are expected to turn out for the Democratic contest between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

The results could say something about the effect of the law, either because a large number of voters will lack identification and be forced to cast provisional ballots or because the number turns out to be small.

Supporters of the law say it's all about preventing fraud.

States who request Photo Identification to Vote, States who require ID (non Photo) to vote

 

Table 1:  State Requirements for Voter Identification

States That Request Photo ID
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Indiana
Louisiana
Michigan
South Dakota

States that Require ID (photo not required)
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Kentucky
Missouri
Montana
New Mexico
North Dakota
Ohio
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia
Washington

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
4
theunderminer

Is it really a big deal to have to get photo ID in order to vote?

3
Albert Milliron

I think the main complaint is about older folks who don't have documents have trouble getting a photo id.  My understanding is that there is provisions to help the poor and old to obtain documents free or at a reduced cost.  Some elderly were born at home and don't have birth documents but again there is provisions to help them.  This is where the family members or faith based  and community services can help.

BigT
BigT
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:21 on April 28th, 2008

This is going to be a big story for the next couple of days and then whenever there is an election. To me, this just makes sense - states should be able to make their own laws about voting.

3
Albert Milliron

 

Thanks for the GS big-T.  The response has been quick from leading Democrats.  Sen Reid said today, "this isn't over"  referring to this.  It was the democrats who brought this suit.  They asked the Supreme Court to make a ruling on this issue.  It was a 6-3 decision meaning that some of the Liberal judges sided with the conservative Judges.  In fact the leading opinion came from a usual liberal.  What lost this case was they lawyers did not bring any evidence that anyone was disenfranchised by the law.  You need to present evidence that there is a victim. 

Rachel Nixon
Rachel Nixon
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:43 on April 28th, 2008

politisite, I like this story. I think so long as provisions are made for the poor and elderly to gain easy access to these documents, the measure will help prevent fraud.

In any case, the US has stringent measures in place in identifying those who wish to cross its borders, so it seems reasonable to apply the same standards to its own citizens, in my opinion.

fwinstead
fwinstead
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:32 on April 28th, 2008

politisite, people need to know their voting rights and restrictions.

3
Albert Milliron

Unfourtunatly for Americans it all depends on where your live.  So the best place to check is with your States board of elections.  I have voted in five states during my lifetime, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and South Carolina.  All were differant.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

BigT
First Flagged at 3:21 PM, Apr 28, 2008 by BigT
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (26)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from