NP Rank:
Taking a fresh look at ex-president Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti
Nothing ever seems what it really is, Saddam Hussein was a leader of a government that brewed with take over bids by rival groups political and religious. A country that was designed by the former great British Empire they planned its borders and designed it as a sovereign state, making it a mixture of religious entities and race. Any leader would have a struggle to keep the peace and needs to keep a very strong hand on the wheel of governance.
Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti (Arabic: صدام حسين عبد المجيد التكريتي Ṣaddām Ḥusayn ʿAbd al-Majīd al-Tikrītī[1]; April 28, 1937[2] – December 30, 2006)[3] was the President of Iraq from July 16, 1979 until April 9, 2003.[4][5]
A leading member of the revolutionary Ba'ath Party, which espoused secular pan-Arabism, economic modernization, and Arab socialism, Saddam played a key role in the 1968 coup that brought the party to long-term power. As vice president under the ailing General Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr, Saddam tightly controlled conflict between the government and the armed forces — at a time when many other groups were considered capable of overthrowing the government — by creating repressive security forces. In the early 1970s, Saddam spearheaded Iraq's nationalization of the Western-owned Iraq Petroleum Company, which had long held a monopoly on the country's oil. Through the 1970s, Saddam cemented his authority over the apparatuses of government as Iraq's economy grew at a rapid pace.[6]
As president, Saddam maintained power during the Iran–Iraq War (1980-1988) and the first Persian Gulf War (1991). During these conflicts, Saddam repressed movements he considered threatening to the stability of Iraq, particularly Shi'a and Kurdish movements seeking to overthrow the government or gain independence, respectively. Whereas some Arabs looked upon him as a hero for his aggressive stance against foreign intervention and for his support for the Palestinians,[7] United States leaders continued to view Saddam with deep suspicion following the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Saddam was deposed by the U.S. and its allies during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Captured by U.S. forces on December 13, 2003, Saddam was brought to trial under the Iraqi interim government set up by U.S.-led forces. On November 5, 2006, he was convicted of charges related to the executions of 148 Iraqi Shi'ites suspected of planning an assassination attempt against him, and was sentenced to death by hanging. Saddam was executed on December 30, 2006.[8]
Looking at the total information Saddam seemingly was doing good things for the population of Iraq in fact my opinion is he was a strong leader that improved infrastructure and education in a bid to modernize Iraq. He stood up against the oil corporations of which in fact eventually lead to his downfall. After 9/11 the puppet of the oil corporations George Bush had a partial excuse to take back what the Western-owned Iraq Petroleum Company had lost in the early 1970's.
Saddam became more of a pain in the neck to the oil corporations when....
2nd August 1990 Iraq shocked the world by actually invading Kuwait city after threatening Kuwait since January 1990 where as some troops had entered Kuwait territory. This being related to an argument over the $14 billion that Iraq borrowed from Kuwait to finance the Iraq Iran war, Iraq had argued that the war had prevented the rise of Persian influence in the Arab World, thus protecting Kuwait asking that the loan be made none and void. The talks broke down, then Iraq had tried repaying its debts by raising the prices of oil through OPECs oil production cuts. Kuwait then prevented a global increase in petroleum prices by increasing its own petroleum production. This was seen by Saddam Hussein as an act of aggression. Other problems arose in reference to oilfield drilling on the boarders of Iraq and Kuwait. Saddam also found many other excuses as reason for the invasion. 6 days after a United Nations coalition force operation ‘Desert Storm’ soon freeded Kuwait of it illegal occupant. UN and the US placed sanctions on Iraq of which caused further problems to the oil rich nation with a bad economy. Soon after Iraq was making plans to supply oil to China by building a oil pipeline from Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan to meet with a Chinese financed pipeline into China. This was to surmount the oil embargo placed on Iraq by the sanctions.
Lets have a look at the good side of Saddam Hussein....
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, as vice chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council, formally the al-Bakr's second-in-command, Saddam built a reputation as a progressive, effective politician.[18] At this time, Saddam moved up the ranks in the new government by aiding attempts to strengthen and unify the Ba'ath party and taking a leading role in addressing the country's major domestic problems and expanding the party's following.
After the Baathists took power in 1968, Saddam focused on attaining stability in a nation riddled with profound tensions. Long before Saddam, Iraq had been split along social, ethnic, religious, and economic fault lines: Sunni versus Shi'ite, Arab versus Kurd, tribal chief versus urban merchant, nomad versus peasant. (Humphreys, 78) Stable rule in a country rife with factionalism required both massive repression and the improvement of living standards. (Humphreys, 78)
Saddam actively fostered the modernization of the Iraqi economy along with the creation of a strong security apparatus to prevent coups within the power structure and insurrections apart from it. Ever concerned with broadening his base of support among the diverse elements of Iraqi society and mobilizing mass support, he closely followed the administration of state welfare and development programs.
At the center of this strategy was Iraq's oil. On June 1, 1972, Saddam oversaw the seizure of international oil interests, which, at the time, dominated the country's oil sector. A year later, world oil prices rose dramatically as a result of the 1973 energy crisis, and skyrocketing revenues enabled Saddam to expand his agenda.
Within just a few years, Iraq was providing social services that were unprecedented among Middle Eastern countries. Saddam established and controlled the "National Campaign for the Eradication of Illiteracy" and the campaign for "Compulsory Free Education in Iraq," and largely under his auspices, the government established universal free schooling up to the highest education levels; hundreds of thousands learned to read in the years following the initiation of the program. The government also supported families of soldiers, granted free hospitalization to everyone, and gave subsidies to farmers. Iraq created one of the most modernized public-health systems in the Middle East, earning Saddam an award from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).[19][20]
To diversify the largely oil-based Iraqi economy, Saddam implemented a national infrastructure campaign that made great progress in building roads, promoting mining, and developing other industries. The campaign revolutionized Iraq's energy industries. Electricity was brought to nearly every city in Iraq, and many outlying areas.
Before the 1970s, most of Iraq's people lived in the countryside, where Saddam himself was born and raised, and roughly two-thirds were peasants. But this number would decrease quickly during the 1970s as the country invested much of its oil profits into industrial expansion.
Nevertheless, Saddam focused on fostering loyalty to the Ba'athist government in the rural areas. After nationalizing foreign oil interests, Saddam supervised the modernization of the countryside, mechanizing agriculture on a large scale, and distributing land to peasant farmers.[11] The Ba'athists established farm cooperatives, in which profits were distributed according to the labors of the individual and the unskilled were trained. The government's commitment to agrarian reform was demonstrated by the doubling of expenditures for agricultural development in 1974-1975. Moreover, agrarian reform in Iraq improved the living standard of the peasantry and increased production, though not to the levels for which Saddam had hoped.
Saddam became personally associated with Ba'athist welfare and economic development programs in the eyes of many Iraqis, widening his appeal both within his traditional base and among new sectors of the population. These programs were part of a combination of "carrot and stick" tactics to enhance support in the working class, the peasantry, and within the party and the government bureaucracy.
Saddam's organizational prowess was credited with Iraq's rapid pace of development in the 1970s; development went forward at such a fevered pitch that two million persons from other Arab countries and even Yugoslavia worked in Iraq to meet the growing demand for labor.
Then.....
Saddam saw himself as a social revolutionary and a modernizer, following the Nasser model. To the consternation of Islamic conservatives, his government gave women added freedoms and offered them high-level government and industry jobs. Saddam also created a Western-style legal system, making Iraq the only country in the Persian Gulf region not ruled according to traditional Islamic law (Sharia). Saddam abolished the Sharia law courts, except for personal injury claims.
Domestic conflict impeded Saddam's modernizing projects. Iraqi society is divided along lines of language, religion and ethnicity; Saddam's government rested on the support of the 20% minority of largely working class, peasant, and lower middle class Sunnis, continuing a pattern that dates back at least to the British colonial authority's reliance on them as administrators.
In my analysis I have just listed the good side of Saddam Hussein the full balance of the leaders past can be found at wikipedia.org . Saddam Hussein was to my mind a strong leader and a nationalist, yes a dictator and he was out to improve and modernize his country. He was an anti-fundamentalist when it came to the Islamic religion and to remain in power he like many other strong leaders of history found it necessary to kill the assassins before they killed him. I do not condone that but looking at other leaders in the middle east and dictators through out history Saddam's blood letting was low. His modernization of Iraq was very commendable.
Certainly the Free Iraq war should be recorded as an invasion and once again many many innocent people including children where maimed and killed on behalf of the oil corporations. President George Bush is the monster.
Crowd Power
-
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
Dave Keating
London, United Kingdom -
latifyahia
I am a citizen of the world, Ireland -
Meelifluous
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
















Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (12)
at 16:29 on August 31st, 2008
Its not just the politicians we can not trust its their damn political media outlets. Thats why citizen journalism is becoming very important. The depth of the problem goes much further than WMD's
at 21:45 on August 31st, 2008
Babel-Fish, I like this story. It's good stuff.
It will be recorded as an invasion and SH may end up having a new statue build in his honour in Iraq soon.
at 22:51 on August 31st, 2008
Paraphrasing on the title of Milan Kundera's book "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" into "The Unbearable Lightness of Writing and Publishing" I would add the Wikipedia entry on Adolph Hitler, see here. Under the paragraph of the "Third Reich", I would find that Hitler did many good things for the German people an boasted the German economy and culture in a magnificent way...and...that in this Adolph Hitler context, the 'miserable' US president Bush is, as you wrote, a monster. Yes this is the "The Unbearable Lightness of Writing and Publishing" in our modern citizen journalism time.
at 23:28 on August 31st, 2008
Thanks for the flag, it could end up that way, sad really
at 23:47 on August 31st, 2008
I have read the AH entry in Wikipedia and I must agree, but he used it for deep indoctrination of the masses, where as Saddam seeming wanted to help rid poverty and he was not into fanaticism but was into a form of nationalism of course he was a peacock and wanted to be come famous for modernizing his country. He was no angel when it came to his enemies and was paranoid of a takeover of power.
Thanks for your comment it gives great interest to debate.
at 00:09 on September 1st, 2008
Please before anyone adds pictures to this article could you back the pictures up with the facts and newspaper story behind them. I have temporary remove some pictures that supposedly showed Kurdish people after being killed by gas one showed a guy holding up severed heads. If you want oppose the article please have the decency to comment with facts and links, then I will reinstate the pictures. That's only fair.
I am not saying Saddam did not kill or had not been a sadistic leader. I did leave a link to where my information had come from and Wikipedia has not left much out of Saddam's history. I am now saying that propaganda has been spread about Saddam and that its now hard to believe what has been said about Saddam is completely true. That's because USA's present political administration has used the media of late especially about Georgia that now makes it hard for me at least to trust what has been said and I feel that many things have been twisted in the name of power and oil.
at 01:40 on September 1st, 2008
Babel-Fish, I like this story. Good balanced background article, I see in this case you have to contol the ID of the images. By the way Germany suffers a lot with Kurdish extremists, blocking highways, some years ago.
at 04:55 on September 2nd, 2008
Babel-Fish, I like this story. It's good stuff.
You think like I do Babel-fish...I agree with you on Saddam. He was battling many things such as still not getting his Iraq back after the Ottoman Empire had control and stole Kuwait from them, for Opium running going into China. The US was responsible for that trade link getting its Opium from Turkey..He was up against Kurds who were opposition forces being driven from Turkey, and having to prevent unwanted Turks trying all of a sudden to acquire Iraq land. Iran was supporting Kurd advances and is another reason Saddam was at war with Iran, that the USA encouraged. The USA sold chemical Weapons and weapons of mass destruction in the same way as they help Germany and Hitler come to power.
From my historical eye I blame the USA for WWII and the Invasion of Iraq. The same elite group were in involved; namely the Bush family members helped finance Hitler to power, as they helped supply WMD to Saddam to fight America's war with Iran. Saddam loss many soldiers fighting for America, and what did he get out of it? Nothing....They would not let him pay off his debts, when he wanted to increase the price to oil, so he decided to take back and reintegrate Kuwait back to Iraq as payment. The US waged War on Saddam in Kuwait, and later removed him from power by hanging him, to do what Saddam wanted to do all along in raising the price of oil. After Saddam was executed they jacked the price of oil so high that it makes Saddams price rise request look like a beggars handout. Talk about slick....and the American people support Republicanism? I am really shocked and awakened to believe Americans would allow this to happen.
Nobody knows this but George Bushs wife Barbara's father owned Oil wells in Kuwait. <--- Mistake here I meant to say George Bush's Grandfather Samuel. I went to Kennebunkport to find out information on the Bush's and I got this from an older retired gentlemen who knew the Bush's well. The American People were never told Bush family had oil wells in Kuwait. I think the war in Kuwait would not have happened.
Furthermore; the Hilter connection was more than a Bush connection as well. Henry Ford was a noted Nazi sypathsizer along with several other well known American Blue Chip Companies....People like to say they are capitalists, instead of Nazi's.....but they fail to accept that they are from the United States doing these acts of evil?
I hope they do restore Saddam's Statue....If anyone is an evil dictator it is selected GW Bush...a complete lunatic.http://www.henry-ford.org/
Rev. Jermano
at 15:04 on September 1st, 2008
thank you solarlife for the flag and for your sensible comment. I remember the blockade but not the reason behind it.
at 16:10 on September 1st, 2008
P { MARGIN: 0px 0px 5px } BODY { MARGIN: 0px }
I agree with most of what you are saying but I can not see any proof that Marvin Pierce was into oil
Source: en.wikipedia.org
What you have said about Marvin is not backed with solid proof and at present seems to misinformation. Can you supply further proof?
USA is not really run by politicians but rich capitalist, I personally am very unhappy about a world run by greedy profit makers and that indoctrination and propaganda is the tools used to fool the peace loving citizens of this world. These guys seem to find it not wrong to back both sides in a war or create wars to line their pockets.
We live in a world where the Media is used to control the hearts and minds of the people a media that can not be trusted because its mostly owned by political entities and the rich cooperates are holding all the strings.
Thank you for the flag and adding to the debate.
at 17:07 on September 1st, 2008
Excuse me it was Samuel P. Bush not Marvin Pierce. http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch27.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Prescott_Bush
Samuel was a business man connected with John D. Rockefeller, who had oil interests in Kuwait.
at 17:57 on September 1st, 2008
George Bushs wife Barbara's father was Marvin Pierce? George Bush's Father, lol
Its okay we all make mistakes that's what makes us human. Yes that was certainly a link and I totally agree.
Thank for sorting out my confusion