NP Rank:
TEA Party Woman assaulted by Obama Fanatic at Princeton, MN event
This is a introduction to a story I wrote on Examiner.com regarding a woman being assaulted by an Obama Fanatic at a Minnesota TEA Party Event.
Princeton, Minnesota, USA
An infiltrator at the Milaca TEA Party Patriots meeting today struck a women tea partyer. (Victims name withheld by Request - we will only identify her as "T")The Milaca TEA Party Patriots group meets twice a month, once as a business meeting and once as a more social meeting. The agenda for today's social function was watching the film "Shadow Government" and was scheduled to begin at 2pm CST. Just prior to the meeting, an older man began arguing with a female member of the group.
This woman was a 3 time cancer survivor and came directly from her release from the hospital to this tea party event. The man ranted that the tea party group was just anti-government trouble makers. This frail woman put up her hand in defense and to signal "whoa, this too intense". The man struck her defensively raised hand hard enough to cause extreme pain. The victim told the assailant, "You have the right to your opionion, but you do not have the right to hit me". At this point, other members of the group intervened. The man was shown the door.
Milaca TEA Party Patriot Leaders Sue Bican and Mike Puffer indicated they explained to the man that the TEA Party is not anti-government, it is anti-Corrupt Government. They gave the bank bailout and Louisiana purchase for a healthcare vote as examples of corruption that the TEA Party Stands against. Even more than that, the TEA Party Movement is for adhering to the constitution as the Founding Fathers intended. That position alone defines the TEA Party as Pro Representative Republic Government and not as anti-government aka anarchy....
Click here to read more and view more graphics for free here: Examiner.com
Those were my thoughts.
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
CynicalPatriot
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 08:38 on March 28th, 2010
Why is the man alleged to have attacked a Tea Party participant identified as an "Obama fanatic" ?
Nothing in this article or the linked article at the Examiner gives background on the alleged attacker regarding the man declaring his affinity to President Obama.
The Examiner article merely offers several unsubstantiated theories bandied about by unidentified individuals within the assembled crowd.
at 21:39 on March 28th, 2010
I just report what people say, sorry if it is not to your liking.
Accusing the tea party of being "anti-government" would be consistent with something someone would say who was for big government and for big government take over of health care.
But I am not going to waste my time explaining anything to any Democrat. What is the point? Democrat Bill Clinton wanted to argue the meaning of "is" as in whether he was lying or not depending on the interpretation of what :"is" means... And since none of you Democrats ever took him to task for lying (or for that matter, his sexists attitudes regarding women) I can safely deduce that all Democrats do not understand something as fundamental is means would argue the meaning of every word in any explanation I would give.
Ergo, there is no point in trying to explain anything to a group of people so duplicitous that they would let one of their own get away with pergury by arguing the meaning of is. You di not hold your own accountable. And, therefore you reap as you have sown.
Get a dictionary... Figure out what is means. Hold your perjuring, philandering Billy the Clinton accountable and then maybe you will have earned the right to engage in meaningful conversation.
Those were my thoughts.
Don Mashak, Article Author
The Cynical Patriot
at 15:39 on March 28th, 2010
Karen, Tea partiers are being accused of doing all sorts of acts of violence, with no proof, like smashing windows, firing shots and so on, yet that hasn't stop the untrustworthy Main Stream Media from reporting that they are doing these things. Back in 2008, someone took a hammer to a Democratic/Obama HQ building to smash the windows. It was initially blamed on Republicans/right-wingers. After an investigation, it was found that it was a left-winger that did it. You see, left-wingers have a long history of doing things like this to try to get the blame fixed on the other side to try and make them look bad. And the MSM plays along - until the truth comes out. Then they drop the story like a hot potato. The media has even went so far as to say, yep, its Republicans doing this, no doubt about it- and doing so without any proof at all. 1.) A Tea partyer had his finger bitten off by an Obama thug. Documented and substantiated proof of this. A black conservative was assaulted by union thugs at a St. Louis town hall protest and a woman filimg it was attacked. Eyewitness proof of this as well as YouTube video proof of this. Yet the MSM won't report them. Why? Because the MSM are hacks that only report pro-Democrat, pro-Obama, pro-liberal stories. The MSM is not to be trusted - ever. 3 Republicans representative have stepped forward - with tangible evidence (pictures, audio recording ) to show that their office was shot at recently or that they were threatened over the phone. Yet the MSM won't report it. 2.) Just a partial list from 2004-2010 (documented with arrests, videos and so on) show that State Republicans HQ's have been shot at, burglarized, windows smashed, tires slashed in multiple instances, 30 get out the vote vans had their tires slashed - one arrest was the son of a Democrat - Rep. Gwen Moore. Offices have been egged. Kerry supporters destroyed property in NYC, beat a detective unconscious, and threatened attendees at the GOP convention. Obama thugs accosted women in Orlando, Florida in 2008, Obama said "If they bring a knife to a fight, we bring a gun." Youtube video of this. Why would Obama want to fan the flames? Obama also said to his supporters"Get in their faces" when he was running for president. Youtube video of this. Along with what is listed in 2.) there is what is listed in 1.) And much, mch more has happened from 2004-2010 than what is listed here. Left-wingers are violent. BTW, the CBC membners who said that they had racial slurs directed at them have not (to my knowledge) provided any video proof to back up their allegations. In fact, other eyewitnesses have said that no racial slutrs were directed at them. Also, in fact, videos have surfaced that show no racial slurs being dirceted at them. So the evidence leans in favor of the Tea Partyers not directing racial slurs at CBC members. Someone is lying. I wonder who.
at 18:28 on March 28th, 2010
The question remains:
Why is the man alleged to have attacked a Tea Party participant identified as an "Obama fanatic" ?
Nothing in this article or the linked article at the Examiner gives background on the alleged attacker regarding the man declaring his affinity to President Obama.
The Examiner article merely offers several unsubstantiated theories bandied about by unidentified individuals within the assembled crowd.
at 00:03 on March 29th, 2010
I think the real question, Karen, is why you are holding Cynical Patriot to a certain standard when you ignore how the media is following the same standard as he apparently is and did so before him. If the media (NY Times, WaPo, LA Times) says that people are being violent and say (without any proof) that that shows that they are clearly anti-Obama, pro-Republicans, etc, then that means that this guy hitting that lady must be held to the same standard. He therefore is clearly an Obama fanatic. Additionally, if the media (NY Times, WaPo, LA Times, etc) have that standard and they are supposedly the best - the professionals - then surely Cynical Patriot should follow their standard, right? That you would focus on him and not post (along with what you are posting here) that he has as much right to post what he did and how he did it (like the media is reporting what they are and how they reporting it) shows your bias, Karen. But you had your chance. Too late for you to show that you aren't a biased libtard hack. BTW, clearly this was a pro-Tea Party, pro-conservative, pro-McCain, pro-Sarah Palin, pro-Republican kind of guy that hit that lady Tea Partyer. No way that he could be anti-Obama. No way.
at 19:41 on April 26th, 2010
Actually, the real question is, why are Tea Baggers not more popular? We are very peaceful and have made very strong comparisons to our plight against a corrupt government and the jews who were killed during the holocaust. As Sue Bican more appropriately said “If we do nothing, we are no better than the Jews who stood in line for the gas chambers." Now, Karen, we could spend a minute answering your simple question, but that would be stupid. It would actually get something accomplished. I'm proud to be a tea bagger and all the racist, ignorant stereotypes that come with it.So what if the entire world thinks we're nut bags, I prefer to say.. "AHEM! I am tea bagger, thank you very much!"
at 19:44 on April 26th, 2010
Hmm, that clears it up. I totally agree. We patriots face the same plight jews did during the Halocaust.