Terror Masters, Dope Dealers, and Foreign Aid Scammers

by René | November 22, 2009 at 12:16 pm
152 views | 10 Recommendations | 3 comments

Why the US continues to ignore Pakistan's creation of, control of, and farce of a war on the Taliban, I fail to understand. And why do we continue to fund them?

Baron Bodissey on the Gates of Vienna writes: 

Several years ago, while researching the extensive and confusing data on radical Islam in Pakistan, I read a number of articles by B. Raman and other experts on Indian national security. The wealth of information they presented about Pakistan’s devious maneuvers made me realize that Pakistan is one of the three epicenters of the Great Jihad, with the other two being Iran and Saudi Arabia.

In the heat of events during the fall of 2001 — when President Bush lauded Pervez Musharraf’s Pakistan as a “friend of the United States” — it was easy to forget that the Taliban had been the creation of Pakistan’s security services, and were their preferred means of controlling Afghanistan.
No evidence has appeared that Pak and its leaders have given up on controlling Afghanistan.

The Baron refers to an deep analysis of the situation by Pundita, including this remark:

If my analysis of the allover situation is correct, it would indicate the U.S. needs a different plan than the stepped-up counterinsurgency operation the ISAF report recommends, or at least a greatly altered plan.

It would also indicate that General McChrystal needs to yell at the top of his lungs, in public if necessary, about a holdover Cold War-era relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan that's getting many U.S. troops killed and injured for no good reason. And wasting billions of U.S. dollars.

Pundita also comments on a previously little known op called Operation Evil Airlift.

As the Baron suggests, you might need a really stiff drink before reading this, especially if you have friends or loved ones in Afghanistan.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
Hugh Askew

"It would also indicate that General McChrystal needs to yell at the top of his lungs, in public if necessary, about a holdover Cold War-era relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan that's getting many U.S. troops killed and injured for no good reason. And wasting billions of U.S. dollars."

Oh, wow. Is he ever correct!

0
YankeeJim

McChrystal has a direct line to the President. Blow the lid off there. No need to go public directly. Let intermediaries do that.

0
René

direct line? you mean like two cans and a string?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Hugh Askew
First Flagged at 2:13 PM, Nov 22, 2009 by Hugh Askew

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (10)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from