NP Rank:
Thousands March In 'SlutWalk' Rally
“I’ve been told I’m not supposed to say this, however, women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized.”
A statement made by Toronto Police Const. Michael Sanguinetti when he and another officer from 31 Division conducted a York University safety forum discussion at Osgoode Hall on January 24th. A comment that sparked anger which has spread throughout the population via twitter, Facebook, and numerous other websites, and has led to today's rally.
The "SlutWalk" rally, as it's called, saw thousands of sign waving protestors dressed in stockings, miniskirts, and high heels chanting "Sluts are us!" and "Yes means yes and no means no" as they marched from Queens Park to Toronto Police headquarters.
The protesters called on police to stop blaming the victims of rape and make changes in the way rape cases are handled.
"It isn't what you're wearing that matters, it's that cops, and indeed rapists, will assess you whatever you wear", Toronto Star Columnist Heather Mallick stated.
At the beginning of the march Co-event organizer Sonya Barnett stated, "We are here because we have had enough, enough of being told that we should be ashamed of ourselves, ashamed of our appearance, ashamed of our pleasure, and ashamed of being victimized."
She went on to say, "We're here to call foul on our protective services who instead of making us feel safe make us second guess whether we should call them at all in our time of need."
SlutWalk Co-founder Heather Jarvis said, "After the incident on the York campus we said an apology is not enough. We don’t want lip service we want change."
Among the speakers were Deb Singh of the Toronto Rape Crisis Centre, Michael Kaufman of the White Ribbon Campaign Alyssa Teekah, SWTO York Liaison and Jane Doe.
A feminist, activist, and author of the book 'The Story of Jane Doe', Jane Doe was awarded $220,000 in a civil lawsuit against Toronto Police in July 1998 for failing to warn her about the serial rapist stalking her neighbourhood.
"I was sleeping in my bed when I was raped with the door locked. Rape is about power and violence", Jane Doe stated.
She said, "The police training they are getting now on sexual assault simply is not adequate."
She also challenged Toronto Mayor Rob Ford to bring changes in the way Police handle rape cases.
"We want Mr. Mayor Rob Ford to stand up and demand the Police department reinstitute the work they have done on looking at training" She continued, "We want training for our Police Officers that is led by experts in the field"
A publication ban prevents the use of her real name or photos. She is publicly known only as Jane Doe.
So, back to Michael Sanguinetti's 'suggestion'......
Sure he may have blurted it out rather crudely and it may also have been taken out of context but, the truth of the matter is Const. Sanguinetti has a somewhat valid point, and I say this while believing he doesn’t blame any rape victims.
Sanguinetti, who is now labelled as a woman hater, could have chosen his words more wisely. He could have said, if one dresses in an attractive or alluring manner one might draw the attention of someone less desirable to ones self which may end unfavourably. Anything other than "women should avoid dressing like sluts" would have been better.
One argument to this is there are the cases of babies and the elderly who have been raped. Cases which I'm sure had nothing to do with clothing; it's an added reminder of how sick some can be.
We live in a society which unfortunately includes some very undesirable people and within this society we are sometimes forced to take measures to protect ourselves and our loved ones. Like when we lock our doors or install alarms, or how some folks take self defence classes, or how we as parents make sure our young children make it to and from school safely. And of course how we help them choose the appropriate attire when they reach the delicate teenage years. We all do this in some form or another and we do it in an attempt to avoid future problems.
Is it our fault we may become victims at some point in our lives? Definitely not. Is it bad that we have to take this approach to make sure we and our loved ones are safe? Of course it is. Do we like it? Of course not. But it's an absolute must. If we fail to do so even for a moment it could be devastating.
It would be great if we lived in a world where we didn’t have to worry about locking our doors or installing alarms or the possibility of having a sexual predator lurking about. Sadly this isn’t the case. We do live in such a world so it only makes sense to try and avoid certain situations to the best of out abilities.
It was said to my by one woman, "We have to take responsibility for our own actions and how we act."
According to the Toronto Star, on Feb 17 Sanguinetti wrote an email apology stating that his "comment was poorly thought out and did not reflect the commitment of the Toronto Police Service to the victims of sexual assaults."
Numerous SlutWalk rallies were planned to take place across the country.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Mike Wood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Recommendations (26)
-
sam_micheal
Miami, Florida, United States -
batvette
San Diego, California, United States -
LCoastMom
On a beach, in Sunny, California, -
MROliver
Vancouver, Canada -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (17)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
KendraPG (not verified)at 20:17 on April 3rd, 2011
You misquoted Jane Doe. She spoke about how being asleep in your room with the door locked should be the safest possible place before saying rape is about power. JSYK.Over ninety percent of people who have been sexually assaulted don't report it. And a huge chunk of that reason is the culture that blames them for what happened, for being sluts, for dressing like sluts, for leading their attacker on. Women are TURNED AWAY by the police, told that no charges would be pressed (this was said at the rally by a representative of the Toronto Rape Crisis Centre) for having dressed innapropriately, for having 'asked for it.'Police shouldn't be telling women that we have to dress a certain way to avoid sexual assault (especially since the clothing has NOTHING to do with who gets raped, as rape isn't about sex, it's about power.) for a lot of reasons. One of them is so survivors don't let their assault go unreported for fear of being slutshamed for having worn a skirt.
at 21:01 on April 3rd, 2011
That is how I quoted her.
"I was sleeping in my bed when I was raped with the door locked. Rape is about power and violence", Jane Doe stated.
I have every word she said recorded.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
John Doe (not verified)at 07:36 on April 6th, 2011
Firstly: we are all adults here so I will talk to you like one. Secondly: I agree with mostly everything you said. Yes the Police force should take more/better action towards rape victims. Thirdly (And to the point) to say that the way you dress has nothing to do with how a "Rapist" evaluates you as a target/victim to me doesn't sit right. I'm pretty sure there are more than one "type" of rapist. None any better than the other. Rape is rape how ever u look at it. But to me personally as a male gone through puberty I would never rape a women that was "less appealing" than the "pretty blond" sitting next to her for example. ( Don't get me wrong I would never rape anyone full stop, nor do I judge anyones personality by their looks) My point Being is, that the average (im going to assume "straight") male teenager/adult would be more likely "turned on" by a women dressed in a miniskirt, high-heels, and a "tight" Tea Shirt that shows "cleavage" and ends just above the belly button. Compared to a well presented, more covered, less revealing dressed women. Especially through teenage/puberty years where male hormones are all over the shop. A lot of the time, women dressed as the first lady described, is all that is needed to push these young males over the edge. Is this an excuse? Of course not. But my point is that the way a those of the opposite sex dress can and will play apart in the process of rape. Just my two cents worth....
at 19:58 on April 7th, 2011
So what defines "well presented, more covered, less revealed"?
If you're saying the woman in a 12" long miniskirt gets raped but the one in a 16" long one won't, what happens when one is 16" and the other is 20"? 20" vs 24"? You've got a slippery slope there until they're all wearing burkhas and full face headscarves- then the woman showing ankle gets raped!
The only message which needs to be expressed here is to any men who cannot control their sexual urges: If you rape a woman you're going to go to prison and probably find out what it's like to be on the receiving end by bubba.
and for the rest of us maybe accept that some of the hotter ones are out of your league. they're something for you out there, if it's not good enough improve yourself.
I for one wholeheartedly encourage all women to dress slutty though of course I don't understand why some men think they should be able to rape them. Throw them in jail, maybe I can move a rung up the ladder. LOL.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
john howard (not verified)at 20:41 on April 16th, 2011
"So what defines "well presented, more covered, less revealed"?"well a man can imagine what you look like without having to see a woman in the nude. But when a women dresses in a miniskirt you just making it easier for him imagine what he could do with you. so i guess what " John Doe" was saying by "less revealed", was that covering the sexual organs and any chance to see the womans underwear. you can do this just by wearing normal pants that end just above the knee and shirts that don't start at the middle of the chest. simple?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
fairies6078at 12:28 on April 9th, 2011
I totally agree with you on this. It is our responsibility to protect ourselves by not dressing to attract.In this world today you just dont ever know.
at 07:49 on April 8th, 2011
"rape isn't about sex, it's about power"
why is it we only hear that from women? that's like us trying to explain to you why you are hard to deal with when it's that time of the month. really that's as wrong as it is right but I doubt you understand what goes on inside a virile man when sufficiently aroused. It is as simple as "we just wanna ****".
from your perspective the perception of control and power may be the case, but I think as many times as not a neanderthal sees something he just has to have and goes for it, his hormones overwhelming his civility. that's not power, that's man the animal allowing his primal urges and mother nature's built in mechanism for species survival overcome what man has tried to tame.
let's not kid ourselves, most of the mammals in the animal kingdom practice mating rituals quite remarkably resemble rape- and without getting unnecessarily lewd, I can't remember a single one of dozens of partners in the 30 or so years since "losin it" who I would ever satisfy by being gentle.
the point is humans are walking a fine line here in the 21st century with a species not fully evolved from the beast yet advancing civilizations toward being forbidden to behave as instinct still tells some individuals.
you are correct that clothing may play a minimal role because whether we had a world of naked women or all clad in burkhas, there would be rape. maybe the correct thing would be for all the women who dress sexy to come down on all the frumpy wallflowers out there wearing dirty overalls with birkenstocks, or mumus, have a slumber party and makeover or something- maybe bring back spandex disco jeans and tube tops? and level the playing field.
at 10:36 on April 6th, 2011
According to the Toronto Star, on Feb 17 Sanguinetti wrote an email apology stating that his "comment was poorly thought out and did not reflect the commitment of the Toronto Police Service to the victims of sexual assaults."
An E-mail following a comment made in a public forum is weak and Sanguinetti must know that - the Toronto Police Service should make a public apology.
Horrific that this attitude exists in 2011 - in LE no less!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
fa (not verified)at 05:27 on April 7th, 2011
at 20:07 on April 7th, 2011
Numerous SlutWalk rallies were planned to take place across the country
So do they have any schedules on this or what? I'm thinking about digging up my good suit and heading on down there to "support the cause" with chivalry and charm.
Besides, you know they want it. Look at the way they are dressed!
Just kidding. I do believe we'd have a lot less trouble on this front if women could actually figure out what they want and be able to express this without ambiguity.
Which is like asking a pig to fly, so.....
- Sign In or Join to post comments
CrazyKatLady (not verified)at 05:14 on April 8th, 2011
Let's get back to basics here: Exactly WHY do women want to dress like sluts?
at 07:18 on April 8th, 2011
That's a good point and I can think of several distinct reasons.
One might be practiced by mostly younger, teenage females who are just catching on that they can gain the attention of males and get them to do things and buy things for them if so attired.
The same age group might find them doing so to compete with other females, that "catty" thing (no offense) going on. This may also be possible as they get older, though may not be as likely in the years between.
Sometimes women who have a mate might do so when he takes her out, like to a fancy restaraunt, so other men look at her and remind him she is still desirable. Probably the most honorable instance, after the next which is....
It's that several day period during the month when women, single or otherwise, just gotta have sex like an animal. Which, if men had their choice, we would limit all contact with women to this period only- and certainly never the week or so afterward.
Also you do have women who do this in the workplace or other professional situations to flirt with the boss, male co-workers, whoever is necessary, to get ahead in their career. This does not necessarily entail actually sleeping with anyone, which some women mistake for being morte honorable than actually putting out. Many of us males would consider this worse however for the inherent false advertising- which leads us to the two final catagories.
Strippers and Hookers. I have met a few strippers who swear that because they "never put out" (my ass, a guy pulls up in a Ferrari Enzo with a suitcase of cash or the equivilent in gold Visa cards, and isn't a toad, he's taking one home that evening) that makes them morally superior to any woman practicing the oldest profession.
And infuriated every one by describing the prostitute at least had the integrity of delivering what she advertised to her client. But then I'm from the chauvenistic pig camp that believes nearly all women are in fact prostitutes at some point in their lives with very few exceptions- society has done this, it starts with teenage dating rituals, the prom, a date must be a fancy meal, etc. We can either pay in whatever is the form of currency, (which can be as cheap as pretending to give you love when in our youth we only want sex) or do without.
If anyone can add to this with something I forgot (supermodels?) please do. And I realize the amount of wisdom I've expressed is probably overshadowed by the ignorance. I actually had a woman talk to me without running away one time so I can't be doing too badly. LOL.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Ashley Lewis (not verified)at 00:34 on April 9th, 2011
Considering that often times girls are expected to "dress like sluts" in order to get forward in society, I find the statement that we should watch what we wear a little hypocritical. Girls are expected to be pretty, have all their make up, and their pretty clothes, and as soon as a girl walks out wearing less than that, they're written off by the rest of society. AND THEN the girls who do exactly what society apparently wants get written off for being sluts so they deserved whatever they got? Isn't that a bit backwards? You can't get forward in life unless you dress like a slut, or else no one notices you, but then if you get raped or sexually assaulted it's your own damn fault for making people notice you? Huh?
at 20:42 on April 12th, 2011
A troubling contradiction you bring up, similar to what happens to older women in Hollywood.
They aren't wanted because they no longer have bankable looks- yet when they were younnger they were trivialized because that's all they had.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
John Doe (not verified)at 07:50 on June 3rd, 2011
I understand you perfectly. For me personally i have come to the conclusion of "who cares what others think?". If im to be judged simply on how i look, then they arn't worth getting to know. Rugged I know but, its how it is. Back to the subject though. Now rape is going to happen no matter what. But just like everything, there are always things you can do to help "prevent" it. Not dressing like a "slut" while walking alone at night down a dark alley for an example. If there was a simple, safe way you could do to lessen the chances of getting raped, would you do it? Most would say yes ( i hope). So it comes down to 1 of 2 things. Dont dress like a slut and risk the chance someone will judge you for it. who most likely dresses like slut for the same reason you would and/or is just a pervert in general. Or 2 dont dress like a slut, and live with yourself knowing that you will make it in life not by how you look but because you worked hard for it. The choice is yours. Not a very hard one in my opinion.
at 10:30 on April 11th, 2011
i feel, regardless of our sex or orientation, we must stand behind women and their causes in these situations .. decades after high school, when i had such high hopes about our social evolution, after watching the turmoil of the 60s when so much 'progress' was supposedly made, i'm disappointed about the actual progress we've made in the feminist cause, women's rights,.. evident by the fact we're still having this kind of discussion or requiring public actions as the ladies photoed above had to perform. it seems like every generation is required to prove themselves or at least take a stand to declare what's important to them. this tells me we belong to a kind of social immaturity which seems never to grow up, never to wizen, never to mature in a lasting sense,.. and it saddens me deeply .. i know sexuality, sensuality, dress, customs,.. are both intensely private/public issues (both at the same time just like religion) that we carry with us at all times - there is never an escape from our own sexuality (for ex). how we express ourselves and our needs varies for a single person over their life and for all individuals in a population .. so we can never agree about sexuality and how to express it. (we're lucky if we can find a small group with similar attitudes about sex that we can belong to.) "rape a helpless child" is never a socially endorsed value but some individuals have been able to rationalize it - allowing their need for domination to overcome the child's need for freedom and autonomy .. as stated in other documents, i was raped as a teen by a friend of mine .. as stated above, it had nothing to do with clothing but actually - the insecurity and needs of the attacker only .. i have argued the roots of arrogance is insecurity, hatred - self-loathing,.. and all negativity is actually based on fear. the rapist is fundamentally afraid people will discover how weak they see themselves. so they rape; they dominate others. this fear / weakness is more of a social sickness than anything else .. we train boys to believe what is 'sexy', 'beautiful', 'powerful', 'admirable',.. when all of these things could be replaced by: sick, twisted, perverted, weak, disgusting,.. to me, a girl "wearing dirty overalls" is Extremely sexy because i have retrained my consciousness to perceive 'sexy' as something different than what is conventionally imbued. but you must start young. from my personal experiences, you must start before adolescence. if you wait for boys to get beyond puberty, it likely becomes exponentially more difficult to replace conventional twisted imagery (about what is sexy) with something more meaningful .. here's a good example of what i find sexy .. in the movie Castaway, there's a girl wearing dirty overalls near the end of the film. why is she sexy to me? because she's an artist, a creator, necessarily Not a follower, a dreamer, a leader (in her own creative way),.. And you tell me, what better definition of God is there? i have argued elsewhere 'God as Woman' so when women speak, we need to listen .. men still hold the power in this world, most police are men, most attorneys are men, most of our legal system is men,.. when are we going to wake up and realize God is Woman? when will we Listen to Woman?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Lazy Reader (not verified)at 21:11 on April 16th, 2011
@sam_michael.Not even gonna bother reading what you wrote. Learn to write properly; Capital letters, full stops and paragraph structure will do wonders.@all others"sluts are us". I think that ends the debate.