Threats to US Congress Reps Triple Since Health Care Bill Passed

by Karen Hatter | April 9, 2010 at 05:42 am
360 views | 20 Recommendations | 13 comments

Videos

Rep. Alan Grayson: Death Threat Heard by His 5 Year Old Son

see larger video

sourced by Karen Hatter

Rep. Alan Grayson: Death Threat Heard by His 5 Year Old Son

The passage of the health care reform bill has resulted in a threefold increase in serious threats to members of Congress according to Federal police enforcement officers.

Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance W. Gainer says nearly all of the threats are from opponents of health care reform. The threats range from the merely vulgar to death threats.

The threats, which have led to at least three arrests, have not abated since President Obama signed the measure into law March 23. The Capitol Police have contacted the FBI about such threats even more often since the law was signed, said Lindsay Godwin, an FBI spokeswoman.

On Wednesday authorities accused a man in San Francisco of making dozens of threatening calls to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) home and office.

In response to the threats, Capitol officials have been working to ensure that the 454 Senate offices across the country are secure.

Some of the offices, a quarter of which are in federal buildings, are receiving additional equipment to help with the screening of mail. In other instances, law enforcement officials are recommending new locks and surveillance cameras.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
stejeb

Strange way to react to something meant to help people.

0
Karen Hatter

The entire exercise from start to finish has been strange, Stejeb.

0
Amy Judd

I can't believe these threats, has there ever been anything like this before?

3
Karen Hatter

I can't recall this occurring over health care, Amy.

I think most of us would agree it is the more unhinged among us that would engage in this type of behavior. All of the misleading rhetoric about death panels killing Grandma and Grandpa and the rest of it haven't helped things.

Of course, about fifty years ago, a similarly ugly atmosphere, also charged by feared change and race, saw this type of behavior during efforts to enact civil rights legislation.

Even more dramatic, in 1856, anti slavery advocate Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner was beaten unconscious on the floor of the Senate by a member of the House of Representatives, South Carolina Representative Preston Brooks.

On May 22, 1856, the "world's greatest deliberative body" became a combat zone.  In one of the most dramatic and deeply ominous moments in the Senate's entire history, a member of the House of Representatives entered the Senate chamber and savagely beat a senator into unconsciousness.

The inspiration for this clash came three days earlier when Senator Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts antislavery Republican, addressed the Senate on the explosive issue of whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a slave state or a free state.  In his "Crime Against Kansas" speech, Sumner identified two Democratic senators as the principal culprits in this crime—Stephen Douglas of Illinois and Andrew Butler of South Carolina.  He characterized Douglas to his face as a "noise-some, squat, and nameless animal . . . not a proper model for an American senator."  Andrew Butler, who was not present, received more elaborate treatment. Mocking the South Carolina senator's stance as a man of chivalry, the Massachusetts senator charged him with taking "a mistress . . . who, though ugly to others, is always lovely to him; though polluted in the sight of the world, is chaste in his sight—I mean," added Sumner, "the harlot, Slavery."  

Representative Preston Brooks was Butler's South Carolina kinsman.  If he had believed Sumner to be a gentleman, he might have challenged him to a duel.  Instead, he chose a light cane of the type used to discipline unruly dogs.  Shortly after the Senate had adjourned for the day, Brooks entered the old chamber, where he found Sumner busily attaching his postal frank to copies of his "Crime Against Kansas" speech.

Moving quickly, Brooks slammed his metal-topped cane onto the unsuspecting Sumner's head. As Brooks struck again and again, Sumner rose and lurched blindly about the chamber, futilely attempting to protect himself.  After a very long minute, it ended.

Let's hope that behavior isn't soon repeated.

0
Grace H

I was totally about to mention this. But I doubt and indeed hope in todays society there are those with enough ethics and decorum to prevent such a parallel occurence.

1
t k kidwai

Every where reactionary forces act same way.The health care reform bill was passed by a majority and thus must be accepted even by those who were opposed tooth and nail to this bill.

Neo-cons are out to destroy democratic traditions and institutions,are a serious threat and more dangerous than so-called fundamentalists who have always been used by neo-cons to counter progressive movements,reforms.Threats are like wake-up calls,act now to root out neo-cons.

2
Karen Hatter

Sadly, TKK, the tactics used to attempt to prevent the bill's passage has created a very dangerous atmosphere that is continually stoked, keeping the embers burning.

There are many within American society that cannot distinguish between rhetorical flourish that demands accountability in language that implies violence and actual calls for violent action.

A cessation of nuanced allusion to violence should be avoided by all who truly do not intend their words to be acted upon by some disgruntled, troubled individual.

1
t k kidwai

Karen,thanks.The bill is passed and by virtue of that has become the law.The tactics resorted to by conservatives( mostly members of the Grand Old Jokers' Party)and tea party terrorists to oppose the law is lamentable and does not go well in a democratic society based on supremacy of law ,on one hand,and on other has begotten a dangerous tendency.And this tendency must be nipped in the bud by all means at the disposal of the state.

1
hidflect

I notice that the 2 people arrested for anti-govt threats are both white, fat, old, bald, glass-wearing, ugly nerds. Not exactly a demographic cross section. Let's not let the 2% of the bell curve turn the nation into liberty-cracking scaredy-cats.

2
Rory Cripps

hidflect: Yes! " . . .white, fat, old, bald, glass-wearing, ugly nerds."

Just like me! HA! Unfortunately, for the more "progressively minded" such as yourself, we (the racist/xenophobic/homophobic/unenlightened ignoramuses that we are,  account for substantially more than 2 percent of the bell curve as the bell curve pertains to U.S. demographics. Not to worry though, for we'll all be dead soon and then I'm sure that the world will be a much better place and without a doubt more to your liking.

BTW: If I said, here, 'I notice that the 2 people arrested for anti-govt threats are both black, fat, old, bald, glass-wearing, ugly nerds',  I'd be in a heap of trouble. Not that I'd ever say such a stupid thing, mind you, because I have respect for all peoples.

0
JustMyOpinion

And how many code pinks "threatened" congressman over the past 8 years? Seems Liberals know an awful lot about "threatening" politicians themselves.

3
doc

Unfortunately, with the exception of Hatter, most of you need a history lesson.  The United States of America is not a DEMOCRACY it is a REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC.  In a true democracy we have mob rule.  Thank God we don't have that here.  In a RR persons are elected to represent the majority of their constituents in an assembly, in this case congress.  They are bound by oath to do the bidding of their constituents.  What we have presently, in both parties, is an attempt to hijack the people for personal gain.  The truth will come out in November when, unless the president declares himself a dictator, we have a military coupe or some other disaster, most of congress on both sides of the fence will be looking for a job.  Just because you think your idea is great doesn't mean everyone else will.   Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Why do you think Rome fell?  Special interest groups, bad foreign policy and corrupt senators.

0
t k kidwai

Doc,I don't agree with you without needing history lessons.Aldous Huxley was more than right when he said that'We learn from history that men have never learnt from history'.There is no such form of government which could be called democracy.As a matter of fact society consists of two kind of people:masters,and slaves.In democracy or what you call RR,although both are same,slaves choose masters.And in the entire annals of history masters were never bound by any covenants they entered into with the slaves.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

stejeb
First Flagged at 7:15 AM, Apr 9, 2010 by stejeb
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (20)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from