NP Rank:
Three Bomb Sniffing Dogs in Philly Fail Bomb Sniffing Test
U.S. Representative Robert Brady of Pennsylvania sent a letter on Tuesday, January 5, 2010, to acting Transportation Security Administration (TSA) administrator Gale Rossides urging him to replace the three dogs who were assigned to inspect cargo at Philadelphia International Airport.
TSA spokesman Greg Soule said the agency could not comment on the status of its dogs. He said, however, that the rigorous nature of yearly certification tests means that some of the nation's 700 TSA-led dog teams deployed in air, marine and mass transportation systems may not pass and must go through a remedial program.
In the meantime, other layers of security are employed, Soule said. TSA-led teams concentrate on cargo screening while law enforcement-led teams handle all areas of the airport and spend part of their time supporting cargo inspection. Built-in redundancy means the dogs' lack of certification will not hurt air cargo screening, Soule said. Brady, however, said the agency should immediately replace the dogs while they are being recertified. Philadelphia International Airport officials said they had not been notified officially that any dog team had been decertified. Edward Turzanski, a senior fellow at the Center on Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, and Homeland Security in the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia, called the situation serious, especially considering that lack of communication between federal and local officials. "These dogs are not ornamental," said Turzanski, also a La Salle University professor. "They are there for a purpose. If the purpose is not being satisfied, that's a serious issue."
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Recommendations (28)
-
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
stejeb
United Kingdom -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
snuffysmith
Washington D.C., D.C., United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 17:14 on January 6th, 2010
This is not good...
at 08:09 on January 8th, 2010
Maybe the Dogs had a cold. I am surprised by this. Most bomb sniffing dogs are excellent at their tasks. I have no problem with using dogs in airports, but I do have problems with drug sniffing dogs around suspect cars etc. Dogs 'indicating' as they call it could be subjective as the officer just has to say, "the dog indicated".
On this issue, I hope that this is isolated and they don't rely just on dogs for our protection.
Thanks for writing this up
at 20:08 on January 9th, 2010
A dog is just one of many tools, that can be used, and nothing is 100%. As a former K9 handler I can say that dogs can be compared to humans in the area of how well they do the job. Yes a dog can have a cold, headache, stuffy nose, or just not feel well. These issues can determine how well the dog detects. It also can be the fault of the handler, the handler has to read the dogs actions and pay attention. A dog may indicate and the handler can miss it. I have found in my experience that most of the time it is the handlers fault when an item is missed.