NP Rank:
Three Ministers to Write Articles for Sunday Papers as Miliband Fuse Lit - "Vote of Confidence" Passed
Senior Cabinet Ministers have passed a "Public Vote of Confidence" in Gordon Brown to lead the Labour Party into the next election. In an attempt to defuse the fuse lit by David Miliband's - by-now infamous - article in Tuesday's GUARDIAN it has been revealed that three ministers are set to write articles for tomorrow's papers (Sunday).
In the meantime, the meaning of David Miliband's recent actions and words - or lack thereof - is being minutely scrutinised by leading newspaper commentators, the following from the IRISH TIMES is typical:
Events showed that Downing Street had miscalculated - for retreat came there none. True, Miliband spent a long time dancing on the head of a pin, insisting his challenge was actually to Conservative leader David Cameron. But the nearest he got to a loyalty pledge was when he declared: "Can Gordon lead us into the next election and win? Yes, I'm absolutely confident about that." Note that failure to say the leader elected unopposed just over a year ago "would" or "should" do so. And why - "Can Gordon ...?" - admit to any doubt at all amid a media frenzy predicting an autumn coup? On occasion Miliband appeared frustrated by the persistent questioning. After all, he protested (mildly), he had consistently said he would not stand against Brown last time and nobody had believed him. Few would believe him now, especially in the light of his reply to the simple question - "would the Labour Party be mad to ditch the prime minister before the general election?" As "a loyal member", the foreign secretary could only say "the Labour Party never does mad things." It was hardly beyond the Oxford-educated son of a Marxist intellectual to work out that the "loyal" answer required was that Labour would indeed be mad to do so. Nor did it require the fine legal skills of serial rebel MP Bob Marshall-Andrews to grasp that Miliband understood the "code" in setting out his stall by way of an article "saying one thing and meaning another".



Comments (0)