NP Rank:
Truth! What is that?
Truth! What is that?
This election year has been the most exciting I’ve ever experienced. I’ve been glued to the radio, television and my favorite Internet sites. I’ve experienced a wide range of emotions: joy, anger, disgust and fear. I have been surprised and excited. I've been engergized. Most of all, I have been worried. I am still worried. I’m worried about the truth. I’m concerned that there is a complete lack of respect for truth.
In the Internet age we can select any number of facts we desire from a seemingly unlimited catalogue. This is really cool! J I can pick a sound byte from the New York Times, a quote from Fox News or a blog snippet from MSNBC. If I am really ambitious I can add quotes from the Economic Policy Institute or the RAND Corporation. Then I mix it all up just right so that my idea seems valid. It is easy. If I want to - by choice or ignorance - I only have to look at a portion of the truth. I only have to look at the truth that pleases me. And, if I choose to, I can add some strong pejorative language to denounce a person or group that I disprove of and thinks differently than me. When I’m all done, I can frame my piece as an opinion and publish it to the world on NowPublic (NP). (Thank you NP. I sincerely mean that.)
However, much of what I read, hear and see is one side attacking the other side. In all my life, I have never seen such a vast amount of opinions / editorials produced so quickly as I have seen this election year. I see bits and pieces of the truth twisted and being used to push a partisan agenda. I see this from the Conservative, Centrist and Liberal camps. For example, lets look at a few quotes:
LIBERAL BLOG ENTRY
"The disastrous policies [this] the Bush Administration followed contributed heavily toward the economic slowdown, but further fueled economic meltdown. You know — Economists [they] say the economy fluctuates in cycles, from soaring, prosperous times, to stagnate moments, to economic slowdowns. BUT, there is no doubt that the failed Bush policies and horrific policy choices have turned a ‘normal’ economic slowdown into economic collapse. These polices are the same policies that John McCain wishes to carry forward. He simply can’t run from it."
CONSERVATIVE BLOG ENTRY
In addition, the failures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were a result of crooked accountants cooking the books to make their bundled loan packages look like profitable risks to the Wall Street banks. These same officials got away with their crimes by lavishing money on mostly Democratic legislators, including Obama, who was the second highest recipient of Fannie/Freddie money in Congress.
CENTRIST BLOG
The name of the blog is "Clowns to the Left, Jokers to the Right". enough said.
What is the Truth! Who’s right?
- The left blames the right
- The right blames the left
- The Centrist blames both the left and the right.
I think truth is one casualty in this presidential election, but I want to revive the truth. I want the truth and nothing but the truth. So help me God.



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 16:47 on November 2nd, 2008
scotte68@gmail.com, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 18:31 on November 2nd, 2008
scotte68@gmail.com, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 19:26 on November 2nd, 2008
You have to look at their records, not what they promise. Here is a sight I enjoy...
http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer
- Sign In or Join to post comments
metaxinat 21:37 on November 2nd, 2008
Just happened upon this entry and read through it so decided to comment. My view is that THE TRUTH isn't attainable by any one person. It would encompass every single minute detail at any given moment in time from every single angle imaginable. Even then, it is only what can be interpreted given our current technological and rational thought. Once new technology or rationale is developed (as with philosophical movements), "truth" will again be redefined.
As others before me have said (not in comments here), truth can only be seen in degrees. You ultimately have to choose.
at 09:10 on November 3rd, 2008
scotte68@gmail.com, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Scott: Your thoughts are well constructed and your query is most valid. To quote, Charles C. Colton (1780 - 1932). "The greatest friend of truth is Time, her greatest enemy is Prejudice, and her constant companion is Humility."
But even historians have a way of twisting the truth to satisfy the wishes of their masters, or their own inherent prejudices. It is those who hold the power to manipulate EVENTS that produce the results sought that can later be argued over as to the validity of its truth. Yet the event stands! Because your inquiry centers around politics and, therefore, will submit an – Example: Obama’s popularity is undeniable, however, a recent event – “The Economic Crisis” – has acted as the catalyst that has catapulted his approval ratings in the polls higher, a response that will most likely carry him to the White House. Having said that don’t you find the “timing” of the event strange? Why didn’t the event surface after the election? The focus prior to the "economic crisis" centered around US foreign policy in the Iraq/Afghanistan War, which would benefit McCain based solely on his exemplary military service. And what makes Obama more qualified on economic matters that McCain? The truth is a “blame game,” as the ‘Sheeple’ only seek immediate retribution from those in power and/or exempt others from blame. Question: Why is it that Prime Minister Gordon Brown (Exchequer, under Tony Blain) prior to the economic crisis was faced with low rating approvals that would have forced an election. Yet, following the current Economic Crisis his rating and popularity have greatly improved, thereby, guarantying his remaining in his position as Prime Minister? He only needed to point the finger of blame at <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />America to "kill two birds with one stone!"This is a single event and doesn’t entirely answer your inquiry as to the truth, but it should raise your curiosity and provide insights as to “who” created the event that will satisfy the objectives of those who sought the assumed results, so as, to secure their goal – “Power!” The answer lies with the power structure that rests behind Gordon Brown, not him directly.
-END-