NP Rank:
Turn off oil and start the transformation
All Americans have vested interest in energy production and transforming from fossil fuel dependency to a combination of alternatives. The nations that accomplish the transformation the fastest will be the winners in the long run. Corporations and communities that have vested interest in fossil fuel energy production will be laggards. They will resist and hold off the transformation as long as possible.
Therefore, when you hear some leaders from New Orleans insist on getting back into the offshore oil business, they do so with transparent bias.
Leaders from that region should be pondering 1) how move the population away from the waterfront as it is too low for habitation, 2) how to attract manufacturing industry and entrepreneurs, 3) how to turn the waterfront into an ecological paradise financed by BP.
“Should U.S. Halt Drilling Because Of BP?
By Seth Borenstein, AP Science Writer
Manufacturing.Net - July 13, 2010NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- The first public hearing by a presidential oil spill panel Monday zeroed in on the relationship between BP and the company it hired to drill the now exploded rig.
In an effort to fight a new drilling moratorium, a rival drilling executive and a Louisiana congressman said other oil operators shouldn't be tarred because of one bad apple: BP's Deepwater Horizon rig.
Larry Dickerson, president of a rival drilling company, told commissioners that the April 20 explosion and resulting oil spill were "the result of reckless operating mistakes."
He said errors were likely made in monitoring drilling mud, in decisions on when to use the blowout preventer and about whether BP PLC or its contractor, Transocean Ltd., was in charge of safety.
BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells testified at the start of the two-day hearing about what BP was doing to try to stop the leak. None of the seven commissioners asked him about the causes of the rig explosion, and Wells did not discuss the question of blame.
U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Louisiana, also in arguing to lift the drill ban said: "The vast majority of companies were doing things in a much safer way than BP was doing."
Dickerson, president of Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc., which is the No. 2 deepwater drilling contractor, said on the wells they run, they would stop work immediately if something goes wrong. That's even if a customer, like BP, wants to keep going.
"It appears that somebody may not have adequately monitored what's coming out of the hole," Dickerson said. He said he didn't have first hand knowledge but based his comments on media reports.
In Washington, the Obama administration issued a revised moratorium through Nov. 30 on deep-water offshore drilling Monday to replace the one that was struck down by the courts as heavy-handed.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar made the announcement, arguing that a pause is still needed to ensure that oil and gas companies implement safety measures to reduce risks and are prepared to handle spills.
Commissioner Fran Ulmer, former lieutenant governor of Alaska, said there needs to be "a higher standard of decision making" on drilling rigs about safety.
Dickerson said his company has had to shut down drilling in the name of safety. He said it is important that his operators have a "hands on the brakes" and not have to go back and forth with the customer.
"There's a natural friction between safety and caution and meeting schedules," Dickerson told reporters. "We need to resolve that in favor of safety."”


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 09:16 on July 13th, 2010
oil use is not something just turn off. alternative energy must first compete with in existing market. it must offer more than the idea. it require infrastructure and product to use it. it also require. as long as oil can compete cost/efficiency those who use such products will always choose cheapest. change over will require time and energy we can not expect industry to adopt energy system not yet available or anywhere near viable. mixed solutions will be with us for some time and i believe also that as long as oil available oil will be used in some form or another. part i don't understand, other than money again, is why towns and cities not encouraging houses to adopt solar and wind generation in the suburban developments?? municipal costs to maintain current infrastructure would soon balance out loss of service revenue. i think so. also public will to make change not high as nobody trust information source to many ideologues ranting and not enough reasoned debate. like i said before on related post scientist need to return to nonpolitical stance and give up some jobs maybe to keep integrity of professional provider of unbiased information.be nice if politicians did same :-)
at 10:16 on July 13th, 2010
The process of energy transformation is a part of creating a new economy. Jobs created to produce the new infrastructure and all of the equipment and systems that go along with it are good jobs that lay the foundation for producing products and services for the global market.
The examples you provide are correct.
I believe that many communities in the USA are in the wrong location altogether. They are a happenstance and legacy from which we must escape because they are too costly.
at 11:31 on July 13th, 2010
that and to much arable land under development and big loss to agriculture which needed for green fuel industry and also needed feed growing world population. which is also not pc to talk about in regards to greenhouse gas/pollution.