NP Rank:
U.S. Citizens Right to Vote under attack by States
Many states have always been on a path to trample the citizens’ right to vote as they attempt to discourage certain people from voting or attempt to manipulate the outcome by various scheduling and procedural means. For that reason, citizens and the Federal Government must be vigilant of State’s behavior.
“The United States Constitution, in Article VI, section 3, stipulates that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." The Constitution, however, leaves the determination of voting qualifications to the individual states. Over time, the federal role in elections has increased through amendments to the Constitution and enacted legislation, such as the Voting Rights Act of 1965.[1] At least four of the fifteen post-Civil War constitutional amendments were ratified specifically to extend voting rights to different groups of citizens. These extensions state that voting rights cannot be denied or abridged based on the following:
§ Birth - "All persons born or naturalized" "are citizens" of the US and the US State where they reside (14th Amendment, 1868)
§ "Race, color, or previous condition of servitude" - (15th Amendment, 1870)
§ "On account of sex" - (19th Amendment, 1920)
§ In Washington, DC, presidential elections after 164 year suspension by US Congress (23rd Amendment, 1961)
§ (For federal elections) "By reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax" - (24th Amendment, 1964)
(For state elections) Taxes - (Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966))
§ "Who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age" (26th Amendment, 1971).
In addition, the 17th Amendment provided for the direct election of United States Senators.
The "right to vote" is explicitly stated in the US Constitution in the above referenced amendments but only in reference to the fact that the franchise cannot be denied or abridged based solely on the aforementioned qualifications.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the_United_States
Watch out.
“Asking voters for proof of citizenship isn’t outlandish
Politics Examiner
Rushing to pass laws before an election is suspicious
I beg to differ with Eugene Robinson about voter qualification and registration. He wrote that “The most popular means of discouraging those young and minority voters — who, coincidentally, tend to vote for Democrats — is legislation requiring citizens to show government-issued photo identification before they are allowed to cast a ballot.”
Being a citizen of the USA is a legal requirement for voting. Asking for identification should be a fair and straightforward requirement with easy compliance. Use a passport and that is done. Use a passport to register and driver’s license to confirm state and local residence and 1) the combination is valid, and 2) if states want to issue a voter ID as an alternative, that should be OK too. These are easy for satisfying standards for compliance.
You don’t have to broach the subject of a National ID card, though that would be a nice alternative too.
The motivation of states to press for voter ID is suspicious and in many cases politically motivated as Eugene suggests, however, the best way to parry away that ill-motivated behavior is to solve the problem as I have suggested. Then, make it easy for people to comply.
“A GOP witch hunt for the zombie voter
By Eugene Robinson, Published: April 30
Republicans are waging the most concerted campaign to prevent or discourage citizens from exercising their legitimate voting rights since the Jim Crow days of poll taxes and literacy tests.
Four years ago, Democrats expanded American democracy by registering millions of new voters — mostly young people and minorities — and persuading them to show up at the polls. Apparently, the GOP is determined not to let any such thing happen again.
According to the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, which keeps track of changes in voting laws, 22 statutes and two executive actions aimed at restricting the franchise have been approved in 17 states since the beginning of 2011. By the center’s count, an additional 74 such bills are pending.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...ory.html?hpid=z2”



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)at 12:15 on May 1st, 2012
Those damn evil Republicans out to stop the legal American citizen from voting. Wonder how they ever expect to get elected doin' that? LOL. Silly progs ....all up'n arms about their own purely fabricated lie to exploit the stupid..... again!
at 13:32 on May 1st, 2012
I would give to you .5 points for that.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)at 14:26 on May 1st, 2012
It's nothing but pure hyperbole and outright b.s. to make the assertion that Republicans want to discourage voting among the young or minorities. The GOP has program[s] especially to bring in that voting demographic. ie: the Young Republicans and the Black Republicans. Put on the old thinking cap!! If the progs are so traumatized by the idea of using ID to separate the legal American citizen voter from the illegal immigrant/migrant voter it may well have to do with where they are working hardest to garner the votes for Obama. Perhaps, instead of publishing this tripe, the WP ought to do an expose on the prog effort to bring in the illegal voter to bunker the Obama campaign like they did to get the illegal worker into unions and paying dues to them while blaming illegal immigration on the small to medium business. The hypocrisy of the American Progressive is nauseating to say the least. And please don't take this as any defense of Republicans. They're in among the ranks of the American progressive too. I suspect Mitt Romney is their man for the White House. Mitt in my opinion is definitely RINO.
at 02:33 on May 2nd, 2012
Another .5.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)at 06:27 on May 2nd, 2012
Finally a full digit. All my years here commenting vindicated.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Randor707 (not verified)at 23:51 on May 5th, 2012
30-06, sorry to burst your bubble but the biggest hypocrites in the country are the GOP and Tea Party. For example, on voter ID, numerous investigations have all shown that voter fraud is virtually non-existent in the U.S., yet the rad-con hypocrites use it as a straw-man issue to peddle their own partisan political agenda -- to suppress the vote. Estimates are that 5 million voters will be dis-enfranchised by these ALEC- sponsor voter ID laws. Wake up, dude! Your idea that all these illegal immigrants are gonna vote for Obama is a huge crock. As with most ALEC initiatives, these voter ID laws are an underhanded attempt to hijack our democratic system of elections. Wake up, dude, the world is passing you by. It may not be to late to recognize the reality in front of your face.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
707 in flames (not verified)at 13:49 on May 6th, 2012
"The claim that there is no voter fraud in the U.S. is patently ridiculous, given our rich and unfortunate history of it. As the U.S. Supreme Court said when it upheld Indiana's photo-ID law in 2008, "Flagrant examples of such fraud . . . have been documented throughout this Nation's history by respected historians and journalists." The liberal groups that fought Indiana's law didn't have much luck with liberal justice John Paul Stevens, who wrote the 6-3 decision. Before being named to the Supreme Court, Justice Stevens practiced law in Chicago, a hotbed of electoral malfeasance."