U.S. to Fund Pro-American Publicity in Iraqi Media

by Erik Larson | October 3, 2008 at 04:50 pm
105 views | 2 Recommendations | 1 comment

Defense officials maintained that strict rules are enforced against disseminating false information. "Our enemies have the luxury of not having to tell the truth," Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman told a congressional hearing last month. "We pay an extremely high price if we ever even make a slight error in putting out the facts."

Contractors require security clearances, and proof that their teams possess sufficient linguistic abilities and knowledge of Iraqi culture. The Iraqi government has little input on U.S. operations, although U.S. officials say they have encouraged Iraqis to be more aggressive in molding public support.

The Pentagon is sensitive to criticism that it has sometimes blurred the lines between public-affairs activities and unattributed propaganda. As information operations in Iraq expanded, some senior officers warned that they risked a return to psychological and deception operations discredited during the Vietnam War.

In 2006, the Pentagon's inspector general found that media work that the Lincoln Group did in Iraq was improperly supervised but legal. The contractor had prepared news items considered favorable to the U.S. military and paid to place them in the Iraqi media without attribution. Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told reporters that his initial reaction to the anonymous pay-to-publish program was "Gee, that's not what we ought to be doing."

On Aug. 21, the day before bids on the new contract were closed, the solicitation was reissued to replace repeated references to information and psychological operations with the term "media services."

Senior military officials said that current media placement is done through Iraqi middlemen and that broadcast time is usually paid. But they said they knew of no recent instance of payment to place unattributed newspaper articles. The officials maintained that news items are now a minor part of the operation, which they said is focused on public service promotions and media monitoring.

But a lengthy list of "deliverables" under the new contract proposal includes "print columns, press statements, press releases, response-to-query, speeches and . . . opinion editorials"; radio broadcasts "in excess of 300 news stories" monthly and 150 each on sports and economic themes; and 30- and 60-minute broadcast documentary and entertainment series.


Edelman: "We pay an extremely high price if we ever even make a slight error in putting out the facts."

Yeah, it looks like they learned a lesson from the 2006 exposure of Rumsfeld's "Gee, that's not what we ought to be doing" Lincoln Group psyop; they changed the wording in the propaganda contracts from "information and psychological operations" to "media services". Now, that's getting your facts straight!!!

Telling the truth is not something they've learned to do, though; "[senior military officials] said they knew of no recent instance of payment to place unattributed newspaper articles." BUT "a lengthy list of "deliverables" under the new contract proposal includes "print columns, press statements, press releases, response-to-query, speeches and . . . opinion editorials"; radio broadcasts "in excess of 300 news stories" monthly and 150 each on sports and economic themes; and 30- and 60-minute broadcast documentary and entertainment series." Well, technically, the word "articles" doesn't appear in the quoted list of contract "deliverables"; as GHW Bush's buddy Bill Clinton says, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

"Some inside the military itself have questioned the effectiveness of the defense program. "I'm not a huge fan" of information operations, one military official said, adding that Iraqi opinions -- as for most people -- are formed more by what they experience than by what they read in a newspaper, hear on the radio or see on billboards."


Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Amitjha
Amitjha
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 23:32 on October 3rd, 2008

Erik Larson, I like this story. It's good stuff.

But western media is already wasting too much time on Iraq issue, if they start doing some consteuctive work then that will help them in building positive image.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from