NP Rank:
U.S. seeks 10,000 additional troops from allies for Afghanistan
The United States of America is trying to persuade its NATO partners to commit 10,000 additional troops for Afghanistan as part of President Obama’s strategy for the region. President Obama previously indicated a quick close to the Afghanistan war. A formal strategy on Afghanistan is expected to emerge by next week. Sources also reported possible addition U.S. troop deployment to the tune of 35,000 in 2010. U.S. has currently about 71,000 troops stationed in Afghanistan.
While U.S. is trying to get allies commitment on 10,000 troops, reports suggest that the allies are willing to provide fewer than half that number. NATO allies are not ready to commit more resources due to the growing unpopularity of the Afghanistan war in their nations as well as concerns around charges of corruption on President Karzai's government.
U.S administration is hoping to get NATO allies to commit forces to supplement the planned 40,000 troop deployment target. This would help reduce the criticism that the Obama administration is facing on troop deployment as well as ease the pressure on already stretched military forces.
Among NATO allies, Britain is already facing internal criticism and seems reluctant to add forces. The British government is facing a opinion poll that suggests that 70% people favor early withdrawal as the nation has already lost 97 soldiers in Afghanistan this year.
Germany and France are also shying away from any further commitments to the war. The support for war is now so low in the two European nations that they can reportedly, barely maintain current troop levels. Among other prominent partners, the Netherlands and Canada have already begun chalking out exit plans.
The only nations who seem committed to add forces are Poland, Italy and Georgia. Georgia is a NATO entry aspirant and is planning to add one company of troops in 2010. While the talks are on some military analysts seem skeptical about the idea of supplementing U.S. forces with small contingents from other nations. They suggest that this sort of an arrangement with mixed forces may not yield the results that a single force may be able to achieve. They believe that the forces of other nations are not as well matched as their U.S. counterparts in skills and ammunitions.
While the allies deliberate, U.S. will unveil its Afghanistan strategy on Tuesday. NATO foreign ministers are scheduled to meet in Brussels on the next Thursday and Friday to discuss Afghanistan though troop commitments are not likely to be discussed in detail before the upcoming so-called Force-generation Conference on Dec. 7, in Brussels.
Crowd Power
-
Mritunjay
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Recommendations (48)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
Amitjha
new delhi, India -
aurealeus
BeanTown, to Florida, United States
-
Blogking
St. Petersburg, Russia -
Rick Taberzika
Florida, United States -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 01:57 on November 26th, 2009
Just like Vietnam and the Eveready Bunny, It keeps going, and going, and........
I'm tired of hearing about the Iraq strategy. I'm tired of hearing of the Afghanistan strategy. I'm tired of hearing about the regional strategy.
What I would like to know is... whatever happend to the Osama Bin Laden strategy?
No wonder there is critiicsm on additional troop deployment.
Time to get Osama, Obama... the reason we're there... or bring the troops home.
at 04:38 on November 26th, 2009
Sounds like Vietnam without the jungle. Stop the War Now!
at 02:30 on November 26th, 2009
Whole US military can't solve this problem. Actually any use of force will make it worse.
at 02:56 on November 26th, 2009
I agree with your comments Mritunjay. If they can somehow reduce Taliban activity and start the rebuilding process that might work. Violence begets violence. Thanks for this story.
at 03:05 on November 26th, 2009
Once again creative journalism, no one really know the facts however NATO may not be able to supplier 10000 possibly 6,000 or 7,000 however UN could supply the required amount. But why so many troops hmmmn oh yes inventive journalism.