Is The UN Biased Against Israel?

Obvious slant, not that any anti-Israel people will see it as such.

I think the heading of the article should be.."Does Israel give a toss about UN?"

I remember being an enthusiastic student of all things about the UN when I was a child. Then I grew up.

The place is rife with corruption. How do I know? Well, when you teach ESL in Rome and Milan for a number of years and your students are really highly-placed professionals with extensive contacts, stories to tell and the like, then you come to know that the statement, "The UN is corrupt" is true.

Kickback schemes, you name it. There is a lot of projection going on in the UN as elite narcissists compete with restitution of a personal kind for what is perceived as a world slanted in the West's and the US's favor.

In other words, they steal and cry "Thief!" while pointing at the US and other first-world countries.

Freewind, pointing out selective rage on the part of the UN may not change objectively made judgments about Israel's defects, but I have found that whenever selective rage rules the day, there are almost no objective judgments.

What we already see in the Obama administration is a press that had no objection to an inauguration that quadrupled Bush's in terms of expense, and that his promise of "no pork" will probably be meaningless. He has already provided glaring exceptions to his promises about lobbyists, and will float budgets that will cause inflation.

The lack of response by the press allows this to continue unabated.

The UN is a decades-long version of this same phenomenon of the double standard, and the result is less change and more of the same.

So, the attitude does count. And where is your own outrage at Darfur? What no Jews involved? Just Christians being killed by Muslims, something that has gone on for a couple of millennia, and nothing even to write about in the local dying mainstream media of a newspaper.