NP Rank:
UN rights chief calls for investigation in Sri Lanka
This call from UN Human Rights Chief, Navi Pillay has repeatedly called for investigation into war crimes committed by both sides. However, the highly politicized UN Human Rights Council voted in favor (27 in favor, 12 against and 8 abstain) of Sri Lankan government's self congratulatory motion. This action of the HRC was criticized by Human Right Watch as follows.
The Human Rights Council did not even express its concern for the hundreds of thousands of people facing indefinite detention in government camps. The council ignored urgent needs and wasted an important chance to promote human rights.
Following are recent statements from Ms. Navi Pillai regarding the investigation of war crimes in Sri Lanka:
"A comprehensive process of accountability for human rights violations committed by all sides should be carried out," the High Commissioner for Human Rights said.
"I believe that accountability is a prerequisite for the attainment of justice and reconciliation for all Sri Lankans and, thus, a foundation for lasting peace," she told the Human Rights Council.
The top U.N. human-rights official, Navi Pillay, says civilians suffer the most in all armed conflicts. She says the neglect of basic human rights, as well as discriminatory practices, often are at the root of armed conflict. And, that is why, she says, it is crucial to uphold the human rights of the victims.
She says it is important to get to the truth, to have independent human-rights monitors and the media present in situations of conflict. But, she notes independent observers were not able to access either the conflict zone or the camps for displaced people in northern Sri Lanka.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
sivakaran
Toronto, Canada
Recommendations (38)
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
senthil5000
st Louis, United States
-
B12N
London, United Kingdom -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Tamiya
Voth, Texas, United States -
A. Tran
New York, New York, United States -
Suranee
Ratnapura, Sri Lanka





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 14:55 on June 4th, 2009
A letter by a Sri Lankan tamil who lives in Australia but still feel about his brethrens suffering from the war back in Sri Lanka.
Should be read by anyone who loves peace.
Source: dbsjeyaraj.com
.Agent.
at 16:40 on June 4th, 2009
Obviously sri lanka will not allow any war crime investigation.. it could not even allow independent medias anywhere near the war zone.. now since this came up there will not be anymore guided tour also .. its very unlikely those 20,000 lives that are taken away in days come to justice ..anyway they are only tamils and with no voice to raise..
at 21:37 on June 4th, 2009
It may need world pressure, there is no need for propaganda to get that factor. UN needs to threaten an embargo if an international investigation and freedom of press is not allowed.
I think its highly likely the government will have to bow to the international cry and ensure also Tamil's equal rights as citizens of Sri Lanka. Other wise this problem will not go away.
at 22:04 on June 4th, 2009
An embargo sounds like a good idea Babel-Fish, but with the UN playing double games, I hardly think they would be capable of even suggesting that.
at 23:33 on June 4th, 2009
No need to propaganda to get the factor. Sounds like a good idea too. The vicious propaganda storm and the demonstrations by the eelam seekers abroad to save the terrorists in the last laps of the war could achieve only one thing. It just strengthened the resolve of the Sri Lankan Government to end the terrorists as soon as possible.
When was the last time did we see enforcing UN / World sanctions achieved the desired result? Korea? Burma/Myamnar? Lybia? Cuba?
My research shows that there are two kinds of vested interests are trying to arm-twist to Sri Lankan government by spreading propaganda and by not giving them a chance.
1. Eels (A small minority of Tamil Diaspora) who wants to see their Utopian dream land "Ee'l'am at whhatever cost. We already saw that cost.
2. A couple of Christian religious groups who wants to catch the fish in the muddied water to compensate their loss of ranks in Europe and else where. They too wanted the war to continue. Now it pains them that war is stopped now, but they are not able to make use of this situation.
.Agent.