NP Rank:
Unemployment Benefits Extension Approved by Senate, November 2009
Unemployment benefits extension has been approved by the US Senate unanimously. The benefits are extended by up to 20 more weeks for unemployed Americans. The House is expected to approve the Senate version on Thursday, which will then be signed into law by President Obama.
The measure will increase to 99 weeks, or nearly two years, the maximum length of time that a jobless worker can get benefits in some states.
The urgency came from the latest labor report, which is expected to be show an unemployment rate of at least 10%. At the end of October, more than 600,000 people had run out of their benefits. Democrats have been tracking the number of Americans who lost their unemployment benefits since GOP blocked the bill in the Senate. According to the website, the number has reached nearly 195,000.
Also, more than 600,000 workers had run out of benefits at the end of October, according to the National Employment Law Project, a liberal advocacy group.
The bill will extend the surcharge on tax employers pay to finance unemployment compensation, which has been $14 per worker since 1983.
The bill would extend a 33-year-old surcharge on the tax that employers pay to finance unemployment compensation. First imposed in 1976 as a temporary levy, the surcharge has been $14 a worker since 1983.
Most Recommended Comment
Recommendations (35)

Anonymous user
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (15)
at 02:11 on November 5th, 2009
In France it has been broth down to 6 month and in Japan most get 3 month benefit after that, you better have some thing.
Or face homelessness at the worst.
at 02:55 on November 5th, 2009
This is a big problem. After benefits are gone, what's next? You have to qualify for welfare and that.s a catch 22 as well. I think extending benefits and working on a workable solution to solve unemployment is the way to go.
- reply
oddsox (not verified)at 06:36 on November 5th, 2009
Extending benefits is a band-aid -- just a temporary fix.'Cowpoke is right when he says solving unemployment is the answer.How to do that? Eliminate payroll taxes and fund Social Security, Medicare, unemployment and the rest with a 2% national sales tax. No question it would work -- bring unemployment back down to 5% if not better.But congress doesn't have the stomach to propose a regressive tax.As for Obama, he's promised no tax increases for the under $250k/yr crowd. Something that radical -- too MUCH change for I'm afraid. So, unfortunately, we'll have our 10% unemployment for at least another year, get used to it. ..and in they on-deck circle: INFLATION. Sorry to be so negative, but somebody's gotta tell it like it is.
at 09:52 on November 5th, 2009
Goods and Service Tax (Federal) helped reduce our deficit. It was 7% initially, but then we had a Universal Health Care System to pay for. It has been reduced to 5% since, which may have been a mistake prior to his recession.
- reply
dmarie (not verified)at 09:45 on November 5th, 2009
Thank you is all i can express in this time of need! Thank you so I am not homeless!!!
at 10:13 on November 5th, 2009
oddsox
The value added tax is basically regressive and a flat tax that I am philosophically against because percentage wise it affects the middle and lower income levels disproportionately. However, if a federal VAT would guarantee the unemployment rate would decrease, I would be in favor of it for a limited run, perhaps one year. This kind of tax can encourage reduced spending, but because the profits remain stable at the supplier/manufacturere/retailer level, production could stay stable and increase employment and growth. At least thats the way I understand it.
It's definitely something to think about considering so many people are unemployed and jobs are at the forefront in most conversations.
- reply
sandra dean (not verified)at 11:46 on November 5th, 2009
when will our benefits be in effect? will it be retroactive?
- reply
DEENA SHI (not verified)at 20:36 on November 5th, 2009
My current benefits for my third extension runs out on Jan 9th 2010. Will I qualify for the other 20 weeks as I live in CA?
- reply
GregC78 (not verified)at 10:00 on November 6th, 2009
About the only problem I have with a national sales tax to fund certain programs is the same problem we are having here in Michigan. Tax revenues from sales tax are way down in the past few years and since some program's funding is tied to the tax the funding is just not there. So SS unemployment and medicare could get hurt pretty bad during tough times. i.e. right now
- reply
FreakedOUToverThis (not verified)at 03:23 on November 9th, 2009
Unfortunately the way I read the new legislation is that your benefits must be scheduled to end in December 2009, thus "DEENA SHI," I don't believe you are covered under the new extension, thus your benefits are scheduled to end Jan 9th, 2010. And that is a damn shame b/c you just missed an extra 3 1/2 months of extended benefits. If anybody knows differently then correct me if I am wrong, but I think I am right here b/c that is how I read it. Good Luck, Freakie, a newly founded bar exam failure for the state of MD for Nov.7th., so what do I know, right?
- reply
angela galletto (not verified)at 16:40 on November 15th, 2009
when will the extended unemployment be signed and when will the people who have not received a check since september start getting a check
- reply
Steved (not verified)at 15:26 on November 16th, 2009
Thank god our president is looking out for us Our gov. in NY isn't. Why when so many are unemployed, I work consruction, would our governor stop state reconstruction and put so many out of work. His bandaid for state defisate is to make everyone buy new licience plate at 20 bucks a pop wether their dew or not foolishness
- reply
EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ THIS (not verified)at 08:50 on November 17th, 2009
This law did not one create one 20 weeks extension. It created oneadditional week of eligibility for EUC Tier 2 , 13 weeks of a newprogram called EUC Tier 3, and 6 weeks of a new program called EUC Tier4. That totals 20 weeks.However, the federal rules require that you cannot move from one tierto the next after December 31, 2009. Consequently, those that startreceiving their 13 weeks of EUC Tier 3 on the first payable date, whichis the week ending November 14, 2009, will exhaust their 13 weeks EUCTier 3 after December 31. Consequently, they wont be allowed, byfederal rule, to transition into EUC Tier 4.Congress passed a bill that authorized 20 additional weeks but wrote itin such a way that no one will qualify for the full 20 weeks. Its myunderstanding that Congress is aware of this issue and is consideringnew legislation to extend the December 31 cutoff date, which would solvethis issue. THEY POSTPONED ALL THIS FOR ALMOST 2 MONTHS AND THEY STILL GOT IT WRONG.... WHAT ARE WE PAYING THESE IDIOTS FOR??????
- reply
joshuam12us (not verified)at 07:42 on November 23rd, 2009
I am in michigan and am on tier 1,called uia here and they said I would get the extra week when I get into tier 2 for a total of 14 weeks. After that I do not qualify for tier 3 or 4 because of the dec. 31 cutoff date. They said I qualify for a modified 20 week extension which has a stringent reporting method attached to it where you must submit 3 job searches a week with names and numbers as well. The only thing I am seeing is there is a push for congress to extend the deadline into 2010 for tier 3 and 4,praying that will happen soon.
- reply
snickets (not verified)at 15:51 on November 24th, 2009
I read the bill and I don't see where there is a cut off date. It doesn't say anywhere you have to exhaust your Tier 2 benefits by Dec. 31st or you don't qualify for Tier 3. Can someone clarify this for me?