is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Under international law (under the impetus of the U.N. resolution)
nations would be able to seek extradition and trial abroad of persons
who make statements critical or offensive anywhere in the world
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/hentoff012809.php3
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States
tikun
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (9)
at 09:06 on January 28th, 2009
This world is going to the dogs. Everyone wants to be the speech police. Soon we will all be living under a fascist world union. G-d forbid.
at 09:16 on January 28th, 2009
How ironic isn't it that the Muslims are the one's that want to limit free speech.
at 16:04 on January 28th, 2009
We shiuld respect others but censorship is not the answer
at 13:52 on January 29th, 2009
Is it racist to criticize islam?
at 13:53 on January 29th, 2009
Can it be vetoed?
at 13:56 on January 29th, 2009
I think that the General Assembly aka the GA passed it so its majority rule. Only the United Nations Security Council has veto power/s.
at 14:18 on January 29th, 2009
Well, we now know BO won't order a veto on this, much to everyone's loss.
at 18:38 on March 12th, 2009
I blame it on left wing Hippies
at 21:42 on March 12th, 2009
Barry,
They were to stoned and unable to move or care. I blame it on the Bill Ayers of this world and some guy way up north. hint...