NP Rank:
Update: Stock Market Tanking? Don't Blame Regulators!
Stocks, bonds, derivatives, marginal trading, hedge funds.
Personally, I've just about had it!
It is a given that the stock market and investment banking, when mentioned and discussed, causes many people's eyes to glaze over, their faces acquiring a blank, clueless stare.
However, there is one thing everyone assumes about money. In the hands of experts and professionals, if one acts on their advice, miracles are often promised and expected.
The savings and loan scandal and resultant bailout of the 1980s cost American tax payers billions of dollars, with regulation, or lack there of, of the industry playing a role in its collapse.
During this time period, the actions of the so called Keating Five came under scrutiny, with their role in the S&L (Saving and Loan) scandal costing taxpayers over $2,000,000,000.00 (2 billion dollars).
A chronology of events during the S&L crisis, offered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), can be found here.
Let's take a look at the last market item mentioned in the first sentence of this article, hedge funds, by the way, whose investors were bailed out by the Federal Reserve in 1998.
Over two years ago, while watching one of those shows meant to educate its viewers on financial matters, I listened to one of the guests, offering his knowledge on hedge funds.
Beginning by providing a list of caveats, saying the rules governing the hedge fund vary from fund to fund, etc., with almost all requiring millions to get in on one of these funds, he gave a chilling example that if most components in his representation are true, it's no mystery why the economy is where it is, especially if there is/are similarly loose handling of finances practiced on all levels of the economy.
His example used as it's base a number of investors coming together to form the hedge fund, let's say four individuals.
For this example, each investor is required to ante up $4,000,000.00 (4 million dollars). With four investors investing $4,000,000.00 (4 million dollars) each, a total of $16,000,000.00 (16 million dollars) exists in the fund.
As each investor's portfolio is shopped around to be used as collateral for investment, each investor gets to claim the entire pot of investment cash, that is $16,000,000.00 (16 million dollars).
Now, wait a minute. There is only $16,000,000.00 in the fund but, each investor's portfolio is represented as being worth $16,000,000.00.
Let's see. Okay. With each investor's portion of the fund represented by the entire fund, that's 4 times $16,000,000.00 (16 million dollars), that's $64,000,000.00 (64 million dollars).
Now, minus the REAL money in the fund, $16,000,000.00, that means there is $48,000,000.00 (48 million dollars) in imaginary money that's floating out there on paper, without any true value other than on paper on some stock guy's ledger sheet, with that imaginary money being used as a form of collateral for use in buying and selling stocks and bonds, as well as foreign currencies, precious metals, commodities and derivatives and who knows what all else being traded on the market.
I don't need to hear any financier, investment banker gobbledygook attempt to schmooze me and show me how this is a legitimate practice.
From Financialpolicy.org:
There are an estimated 5,800 hedge funds worldwide, most of which are operated out of the U.S. even though they are often registered off-shore to avoid taxation, with $311 billion in capital.
There's something really wrong with this picture and it doesn't take any type of degree to understand this practice is fraudulent.
But wait, it's only fraud if the folks who make the rules say it's fraud, right?
Besides, the mortgage crisis? That's being blamed for this latest crisis? This is being touted by many as the fault of those American citizens seeking America's most common variable in the American Dream, purchasing their own home.
It was not bad decision making on the part of Americans seeking a home, if, after researching all they could, they approach a lender and that lender deceives the potential home owner into a shady deal.
At some point, as a consumer, one must rely on the individual or institution that is recognized to be the so called expert or, in this case, at least more knowledgeable than the prospective homeowner.
So, let's not look at the rules regulating the stock market or banking industry for any responsibility for this 'economic downturn'.
We need not look at the elements of the lending institution that were not transparent, fraudulently representing themselves to unsuspecting home seekers, causing millions to lose all the monies they had, having invested in their chunk of the American Dream.
By all means, blame the average citizen.
UPDATE:
A link to a series of videos, airing September 21, 2008, with guests discussing with pundits a bailout guesstimated at being between $700,000,000,000.00 (700 billion dollars), going into the trillions. (That's a number followed by 12 zeros.)
Democrats and Republicans have voiced reservations and reluctance to sign off on the proposed plan, each party having distinct concerns with the plan.
Those in President Bush's administration, responsible for recommending the bailout, are insisting there is no time, saying those details can be worked out later. However, it is reported they are working to come to terms on an agreement on particulars.
Both candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties, seeking the office of the President of the United States, are calling for an accounting of plans before handing over any bailout money.
Also at NowPublic:
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
ricknight
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
drocpsu
Dover, New Hampshire, United States -
RayBanBro66
Darby, Pennsylvania, United States







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (28)
at 08:43 on September 18th, 2008
Their all a bunch a crooks and they want to blame everyone else? Including the ones who don't play their evil games? Wish I could laugh.
at 08:58 on September 18th, 2008
It is much worse. We went to almost all cash or cds spread out over several banks 2 years ago.
I worked in the banks and insurance companies for years, 1971 to 2003 and there is nothing behind the wizard of oz's curtain. The good bank/bad bank is an old practice. What they claim as assets for the federal reserve and fdic is just a bunch of over-priced junk. An example in 1998 in BofA (nationsbank at the time) they bought about 80 new chairs for over 1000 each for a department that was working on a capital project. They were then carried on the books at 80+k, but you could buy the same chair at SamcClub for 99 bucks retail. But that is not so bad because they could then lend 1.6 million using that asset for the Fed rules and make the 80k back in one year. Someone got a huge kickback and that is how the whole system works. It crosses all party lines and all racial lines. Crookedness is not discriminatory.
at 11:45 on September 18th, 2008
Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.
Great piece!
at 12:25 on September 18th, 2008
Never seen bucks pass so much and so quickly as they have in this administration.
at 14:26 on September 18th, 2008
Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff. Popular wall street explainer, the first time I read the miracle hedge fund system as easy explained.
at 18:18 on September 18th, 2008
My thanks to you all for reading, for your comments and the flags. It is appreciated.
at 19:30 on September 18th, 2008
Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff. I am not a big fan of Mutuals or Hedges or selling short. With a few minutes each week with an Investors Business Daily in hand, I beat the pros every year. MFs have to sell stocks when their is a big sell off and your money gets artificially deflated and sold at the wrong time. Option trading should go away
at 05:24 on September 19th, 2008
The crisis was yesterday !
Today stocks are rallying world wide !!
Everything's fine now, Karen ...
Source: drudgereport.com
at 05:31 on September 19th, 2008
Which color pill was it to go back to sleep and get plugged back into the Matrix?
at 06:00 on September 19th, 2008
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
at 05:36 on September 19th, 2008
The red pill...
at 05:49 on September 19th, 2008
Thanks, Jordan! I don't want to remember any of this!
at 05:52 on September 19th, 2008
Source: imdb.com
at 06:07 on September 19th, 2008
OH MY GOD!!!! I TOOK THE WRONG PILL!!!!
at 06:21 on September 19th, 2008
Source: moviequotes.com
at 15:48 on September 19th, 2008
Thank you, Emilio! I'm much better now. Just needed some sugar!
at 10:09 on September 19th, 2008
Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 16:04 on September 19th, 2008
Karen and Moonwolf, you're clearly out of your element speaking about the market as it borders on hysteria. If I were you, I'd be commenting on the moves that the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have made in the past couple of weeks. Bailing out AIG, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, as well as buying all of the "toxic" debt in financial institution's balance sheets will add hundreds of billions of dollars to the US national debt if not more. While it salvages the world financial system, which came close to shutting down, there were other alternatives. Ordinary US tax payers will be footing the bill for years for mistakes made by Wall Street. Economists are very pessimistic on the state of the US economy for the next 24 months, thanks in large part to those mistakes made by the overpaid and greedy "Masters of the Universe" working in the financial system. So goes the US, so goes the world economy unfortunately.
at 09:43 on September 24th, 2008
I would say you are out of your element as my piece addressed the continuing practice of allowing the investment industry to drain the economy of the U.S. and the world, as the economies are so intertwined, with some form of bail out crafted by the U.S. government, as was the case when the Federal Reserve bought up the hedge funds' debts in 1998, at the expense of U.S. citizens.
The argument that this latest finacial crisis can be laid solely at the feet of the greedy is specious.
The problem in all of this is the industry itself, which has been allowed to self regulate, with many on both sides of the aisle in the U.S., with one party, supported by one of the current major presidential candidates, promoting deregulation of the industry more than the other party, calling for the industry to be allowed to police itself without interference, a scenario ripe with problems, due to the whole 'fox guarding the henhouse' fiasco potential.
So called experts want to nit pick this, that or the other distinction to be made from the S&L bailout, the hedge funds bailout and now this latest stick up of the American people.
The common denominator in all cases? Deregulation of an industry that should never have been allowed to craft ways of making money that, because they were in control of the rules, had most private citizens ran their households in such a manner, they would be rightfully chastised for their wreckless behavior, no doubt with many brought up on and convicted of criminal offenses.
What is it called when one writes a check when there is no money in the bank to cover that check? It is fraud, right?
at 08:56 on September 20th, 2008
Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 19:41 on September 21st, 2008
How about that $2.5 Trillion the Fed kept posturing that it didn't understand where it went, when in fact, it went speedily into it's own coffers. There were so MANY small businesses, good, bad , or whatever that had skipped financing their start-ups and initial runtimes with SBA money...after all you could get "Corporate and Business" Credit Cards/Lines from $50K to $1+Million for as little as 4.9%, INSTANTLY, which beat the SBA track of going through a feduciary proctological exam and 6 months of draconian paperwork to get 9-11% for 5-10 years...at least until the Fed started jacking up rates to more than double-you come in late on your payment once, and NOW, instead of 4.9%, you're paying a "Default Rate" of 29+%, and soon, over the limit, and other penalties. (Somebody was getting "Exuberrant" all right!)
at 02:17 on September 22nd, 2008
Fantastic piece if writing :)
at 15:44 on September 22nd, 2008
We have technology we waste playing with that could link up the "Third World" to the Web. I've identified any number of individuals from Missionaries to Oxfam that are ther, have offices AND Internet Connections-often in some very remote areas, which I have URGED to "take inventory"...I.E. Determine Skills, Arts, Crafts, Materials, etc. from among the people they have access to and with volunteers (I'd be happy to do whatever I could...) to create and host Commerce Pages, plugging them into specially Created and Sponsored "I-Malls" to get what they have and can create out into the Global Marketplace. Nothing beats Poverty and Ennui like Hard Currency rolling in. IT JUST TAKES THE WILL OF THOSE WHO ARE THERE EVERY DAY to encourage this into becoming the Global Phenomena it could ANd should be. Plus, more Small Businesses on a Global Scale would go along way to smoothing the "Roller-Coaster Ride" our Global Economy seems to be trapped on. That's my silly little thoughts about it, anyway. The TRUTH is: There is NO NATION on this planet that is able to supply it's people with everything they need and want. It's time to open our eyes and Globalize!
at 20:54 on September 22nd, 2008
On The View Bill Clinton said, Derivatives push risk further and further away from the original lender."
The dictionary gives the following definitions:
1. (of a financial product) having a value deriving from an underlying variable asset
2. something that is based on another source
3. an arrangement or instrument (such as a future, option, or warrant) whose value derives from and is dependent on the value of an underlying asset
4. a mathematical expression representing the rate of change of a function with respect to an independent variable
That explains why no one knows how much value is in those bad loans.
at 03:43 on September 23rd, 2008
The Greatest Theft in the History of Humankind
10 Things You Should Know About Bush's Trillion Dollar Fleecing Plan
It is an economic coup d'etat in the making. And people are talking about little else. Here's 10 things that have been on our radars ... http://www.alternet.org/workplace/99876/
Now Is the Time To Resist Wall Street's Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein
We must not let the right use this economic crisis to push through their policy wish list.
I wrote The Shock Doctrine in the hopes that it would make us all better prepared for the next big shock. Well, that shock has certainly arrived, along with gloves-off attempts to use it to push through radical pro-corporate policies (which of course will further enrich the very players who created the market crisis in the first place...) http://www.alternet.org/blogs/workplace/99885/
at 14:35 on September 23rd, 2008
Thanks, Everyone, for your input and the flags!
at 13:11 on September 26th, 2008
Oh, I blame the regulators as well!
Source: marginalrevolution.com
at 16:51 on September 26th, 2008
Karen Hatter, I like this story. It's good stuff.