US Congress " is moving to right a centuries-old wrong"

by Rhonda J Mangus | February 28, 2009 at 05:52 am
181 views | 4 Recommendations | 2 comments

Videos

DC Mayor Adrian Fenty on Larry King Live talking about the DC Voting Rights Act of 2009

see larger video

sourced by Rhonda J Mangus

DC Mayor Adrian Fenty on Larry King Live talking about the DC Voting Rights Act of 2009

The District of Columbia, commonly referred to as Washington, has no representation in the US House of Congress. However, according to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Congress is now "moving to right a centuries-old wrong,..." .

The United States Congress has supreme authority over Washington, D.C.; residents of the city therefore have less self-governance than residents of the states. The District has a non-voting at-large Congressional delegate, but no senators. D.C. residents could not vote in presidential elections until the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1961.

The US Senate however has approved bill S. 160. S 160 will give the right to a vote in US Congress denied the District of Columbia when it became the nation's capital two centuries ago.

The House is expected to pass the measure with a strong majority next week and President Barack Obama, a co-sponsor when the bill failed to clear the Senate two years ago, has promised to sign it.

The measure is likely to face a court challenge immediately after becoming law; opponents argue that it is unconstitutional because D.C. is not a state and does not qualify for representation.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent, who sponsored the bill with Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, expressed confidence that they could win the legal argument and noted that the bill contained an expedited appeals process to ensure a quick court decision.

The real issue, he said, is that the disenfranchisement of 600,000 residents of the nation's capital "is patently unjust and un-American in a sense of the best principles of this country."

"This is a historic moment," said Ilir Zherka, head of the advocacy group DC Vote. "In 2007 we were gaining tremendous momentum," he said. "The huge difference this year is that we have an advocate in the White House."

Two years ago, with Democrats holding a smaller majority in the Senate and then-President George W. Bush threatening a veto on constitutional grounds, the Senate fell three votes short of overcoming a GOP-led filibuster.

Under the rules of debate Thursday, supporters needed 60 votes to win passage. Six Republicans voted for the measure while two Democrats opposed it.



Article One of the United States Constitution provides for a federal district, distinct from the states, to serve as the permanent national capital. The centers of all three branches of the federal government of the United States are located in the District, as are many of the nation's monuments and museums. Washington, D.C., hosts 174 foreign embassies as well as the headquarters of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization of American States (OAS), the Inter-American Development Bank, and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). The headquarters of other institutions such as trade unions, lobbying groups, and professional associations are also located in the District.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Roy C

This is a difficult question.

The District of Columbia is not part of a state. DC belongs to the federal government. The House and the Senate are for representatives of the states.

I considered this an injustice to the people of Washington even when I was a boy and first learned of it.

To remediate the stituation and be constitutional is difficult. I am not sure that a statute, a law, allowing the citizens of DC to vote is, in fact, constitutional.

I have the feeling that we will have to come up with a constitutional amendment to allow that to happen.

When it does, no senators should be assigned to them, and, at the most, one congressman would be OK with me.

Frankly, I think that the whole idea of the senate is nonsense. Two senators from those little states and two senators from California and the other giants is a violation of the idea of  "one man, one vote".

The small states are over-represented and the large states under-represented.

So, one congressman is OK with me for DC.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Hi, Roy! Sorry for the late response -- thank you for reading and sharing your thoughts on this matter that I can't believe leaves approximately 600,000 people without representation in Congress. I, too, consider this an injustice and think it's time DC residents have a voice.

Thanks for the 'rec' too:)!


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Roy C
First Flagged at 2:16 PM, Feb 28, 2009 by Roy C
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from